Skip to content

MR-Compare: A Mixed-Reality Framework for Spatially Grounded Visual Comparison of 3D Gaussian Splatting and Mesh Reconstructions with the Physical Environment

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.20325 · 0 citations · 71 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work introduces MR-Compare, a mixed reality framework for spatially grounded visual comparison between 3D Gaussian splatting and mesh reconstructions with live video see-through (VST), and proposes an anisotropy filter, a zero-shot module that leverages Gaussian anisotropies to improve 3DGS registration in MR-Compare.

Abstract

We introduce MR-Compare, a mixed reality framework for spatially grounded visual comparison between 3D Gaussian splatting and mesh reconstructions with live video see-through (VST). Implemented on a PC-tethered Meta Quest~3, it combines a two-stage registration pipeline with a 3D Slider for cross-media comparison. We evaluated five representative desktop and mobile reconstruction workflows through a real-world benchmark with an exploratory user study ($n=30$) in two static indoor rooms. MR-Compare achieved centimetre-level translation error across all workflows. The two desktop 3DGS workflows showed the strongest overall pattern, with 3DGS-MCMC yielding the lowest registration error and strongest VST-referenced visual consistency. Room-session measures indicated high perceived usability and low workload. We further propose an anisotropy filter, a zero-shot module that leverages Gaussian anisotropies to improve 3DGS registration in MR-Compare. A controlled Replica threshold sweep shows that moderate pruning can improve robustness and reduce residual errors. These results establish system-level feasibility in the tested setting rather than task-level effectiveness or standalone deployment. The project is available at https://github.com/changruizhu96/MR-Compare.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Practical Evaluation of Standard 3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-World Scene Reconstruction

Across datasets, major structures were generally reproduced well, whereas sparse foliage, low-contrast repetitive textures, fine surface details, and distant background objects required ROI-level verification, whereas sparse foliage, low-contrast repetitive textures, fine surface details, and distant background objects...

Tomohiro Mizoguchi · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

VS-Splat: Voxel-Selective feed-forward Gaussian Splatting for end-to-end 3D object reconstruction from sparse-views

Feed-forward Gaussian splatting models have demonstrated remarkable effectiveness in reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) objects from a few two-dimensional (2D) images, even if they are unseen. As existing methods typically predict Gaussian primitives uniformly across the 3D space, most primitives are placed in non-o...

Yunsu Jeong, Hyuk Heo, Youngsang Kwak et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

VoxelTTO: Voxel-Aligned Feed-Forward 3D Gaussian Splatting with Test-Time Optimization

Recent feed-forward 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) methods typically regress pixel-aligned Gaussian primitives, often causing excessive overlap and artifacts, while inaccuracies in predicted camera poses can lead to misalignment in novel-view synthesis (NVS). We present VoxelTTO, a feed-forward framework for reconstructi...

Yibin Zhao, Yihan Pan, Yang-Wen Li et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

APG-GS: Adaptive Point-consistent Geometry for Interactive 3D Gaussian Splatting.

Recent advances in 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) have enabled high-resolution real-time rendering; however, the unstructured nature of 3DGS complicates dynamic deformation. Without inherent topology, 3DGS often suffers from structural tearing and visual artifacts during manipulation. We present APG-GS, a framework enabl...

S. Kwon, Heewon Kye · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.