2024· International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology· Vol 5, pp. 211-223· 1 citation
TL;DR
The key parts and overall layout of JupyterOps are described, including a drastic decrease in deployment time, better model reproducibility, and increased cross-functional collaboration between data engineers, scientists, and DevOps teams are outlined.
Abstract
In the present day's data-centric corporations, the necessity for data science workflows that are scalable, cooperative & more replicable has reached an all-time high. Although traditional Jupyter notebooks are great for searching & testing, they are not enough for team-based work, which needs version control, automation & orchestration on the enterprise level. A strong framework called JupyterOps completely redefines the collaboration of data science teams by applying DevOps concepts directly to the notebook lifecycle. JupyterOps not only incorporates versioning via Git but also executes notebook automation through CI/CD pipelines, orchestrates workflows using Kubeflow or Airflow, and ensures scalability by employing a cloud-native containerization approach, thus bridging the gap between experimentation and production. The system allows seamless transitions from research to deployment, thus enabling teams to keep a record of changes, reproduce results, schedule executions, and scale compute on demand. This article describes the key parts and overall layout of JupyterOps, besides giving hands-on direction for enterprises on the way they can install it in their ML workflows. Several important pieces of information are outlined, such as a drastic decrease in deployment time, better model reproducibility, and increased cross-functional collaboration between data engineers, scientists, and DevOps teams.
This work presents Avatar, an actor-based architecture comprising an orchestrator, an executor, and a provenance monitor, and observes that Avatar's rule mode reproduces native execution, with a single unchanged core running all three.
Suman Raj, H. Nguyen, Haochen Pan et al.· 0 citations
The integration combines DAGonStar’s orchestration capabilities with CAPIO’s efficient data handling to better support workflows operating on continuous or large-scale datasets and improves the responsiveness and flexibility of scientific workflows.
Simone Perrotta, G. de Vita, Gennaro Mellone et al.· 0 citations
The results suggest that integrating persistent execution with session-level provenance can improve the reliability of AI-assisted scientific workflows, and recommend that integrating persistent execution with session-level provenance can improve the reliability of AI-assisted scientific workflows.
Gong-Bo Zhang, Hao Li, Yu Wang et al.· 0 citations
This paper proposes an architecture for a Python-native orchestration platform that borrows the operational role of a traditional RPA "control tower" while adopting the engineering practices of modern workflow-orchestration systems such as Temporal and Prefect, and is presented in four layers — presentation, orchestrat...
Aryanjeet Singh, S. Rathod, Pradnya Suryawanshi· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
This demo presents SAGE as a pipeline-native runtime system and demonstrates it through an OPC-facing control plane and includes a compact distributed comparison against a LangChain RPC baseline over a shared 15-workload RAG suite, where SAGE nearly doubles full-RAG throughput under matched 8-node settings.
Jun Liu, Shu-Hao Zhang· Workshop Proceedings of the...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.