Skip to content
#software testing Open access

kadubon/collective-capability-runtime: CCR 1.8.0: verified reuse and verification-aware growth allocation

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

CCR 1.8.0 adds an explicit verified_growth_v1 policy while preserving the legacy v1 optimizer, signatures, admission, approval and lease boundaries. Replayable service/cost accounting, delayed reuse, immutable assets, receiver transfer qualification, and lifecycle invalidation/revalidation. Exact bounded dependency-bundle planning, independently checked reservations, verifier-service investment, conservative shared quotas and frozen restricted comparisons. Pinned, evidence-only CAIT/VEK/ALT interchange and packaged offline scenarios using ephemeral keys and real task/workcell transitions. Install with python -m pip install 'collective-capability-runtime[optimizer]==1.8.0', then run ccr optimizer growth-example --json. Distributed dependencies remain optional; Python 3.10+ support is retained. The supported initial checkpoint is empty evidence. Finite forecasts are not observations, asset count is not capital, and joint capacity and causal/statistical improvement remain unresolved. The reoptimized permitted reuse alternative matches the candidate in the packaged null comparison. No companion repository or production provider is modified or contacted. Validation and exact build/public-index receipts: https://github.com/kadubon/collective-capability-runtime/blob/main/docs/verified-growth-validation.md . Distribution assets and SHA256SUMS must match the same Trusted Publishing build; public-index verification is a separate post-publication state. No external empirical collective-intelligence acceleration experiment was performed for this release. The implementation supports evidence-bound coordination, bounded planning, qualified reuse, and reproducible software-level testing. It does not establish causal endogenous capability reproduction, AGI/ASI, indefinite growth, or correctness outside the declared evidence and model boundaries.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Review Mar 2008

Agile methods in European embedded software development organisations: a survey on the actual use and usefulness of Extreme Programming and Scrum

The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.

O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson · 238 citations · ⚡9
#computer vision Open access Jul 2017

What happens when software developers are (un)happy

Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 236 citations · ⚡13
#computer vision Open access Oct 2004

Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development

The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.

P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al. · 225 citations · ⚡18

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Nov 5, 2026

Formally verifying agent-written full-stack web apps with PDD Kit

AI agents can generate code at a scale that’s hard for humans to review line-by-line. PDD Kit helps ensure the code is doing what the developer intended by creating formal specifications and testing against them. It converts developer intent into a Verus specification, proves AI-generated code meets it for every input, and uses tests where proofs aren't practical. Developers review intent, not every line. The post Formally verifying agent-written full-stack web apps with PDD Kit appeared first o…

GPT-Lab Nov 3, 2026

Sovereignty Is the Option to Leave

Is your company’s AI sovereign? A practical guide for CIOs on AI vendor lock-in, EU Data Act switching, cloud sovereignty, and testing your exit plan before you need it. The post Sovereignty Is the Option to Leave appeared first on GPT-Lab.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 30, 2026

From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence

Evaluating Microsoft Copilot at enterprise scale requires test data that captures the full complexity of real organizations, yet real enterprise data contains sensitive information that cannot be used for evaluation under any circumstances. The post From synthetic enterprise data evaluations to real Microsoft Copilot AI confidence appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.