Sep 2026· Immunotherapy· pp.
1-7
· 0 citations· 15 references
Medicine
TL;DR
It is argued that the major limitations of CAR-T therapy in solid tumors arise from a complex interplay between biological barriers and engineering constraints, and future advances will likely depend less on improving gene delivery and more on establishing mechanisms that support CAR-T infiltration, expansion, and persistence within tumors.
Abstract
The emergence of in vivo CAR-T technologies has generated considerable excitement as a means of simplifying cellular immunotherapy. However, whether current in vivo CAR-T platforms are truly positioned to succeed in solid tumors remains unclear. We argue that the major limitations of CAR-T therapy in solid tumors arise from a complex interplay between biological barriers and engineering constraints. Although in vivo CAR-T platforms may simplify manufacturing, the delivery strategy itself directly influences which T-cell populations are engineered, the level and duration of CAR expression, cellular phenotype, persistence, and safety. Therefore, in vivo CAR-T therapies do not eliminate the biological barriers that restrict ex vivo CAR-T therapy, including poor trafficking, stromal exclusion, antigen heterogeneity, T-cell dysfunction, and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Consequently, in vivo CAR-T therapies inherit nearly all of the challenges that have restricted ex vivo CAR-T therapy while simultaneously introducing additional limitations related to CAR-T generation, persistence, and controllability. The encouraging results observed in hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases may therefore not predict success in solid tumors. Future advances will likely depend less on improving gene delivery and more on establishing mechanisms that support CAR-T infiltration, expansion, and persistence within tumors.
The mechanisms, current clinical landscape, and major challenges of in vivo CAR-T cell therapy are summarized and existing optimization strategies applicable to this therapy are systematically outlined.
Yi-Kun Li, Feng-Ling Wang, Jia-Qian Li et al.· Biochemical Pharmacology· 0 citations
If in-vivo CAR-T therapy approaches continue to mature, they may offer a more scalable, cost-effective, and accessible alternative to traditional ex vivo CAR-T therapy, though this remains a projected rather than demonstrated benefit.
Lia Bhatia· American Journal of Student...· 0 citations
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment of several hematological malignancies, but its broader application remains constrained by the complexity, cost, and time required for conventional ex vivo manufacturing. In vivo CAR T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising next-generation str...
The main delivery platforms under clinical investigation are described, focusing on lentiviral vectors and lipid nanoparticles, and their differences in terms of mechanisms of action, associated risks, and optimization strategies are discussed.
François Vilcot, Carole-Anne Brugère, Jaime Fuentealba et al.· Bulletin du Cancer· 0 citations
This review provides an overview of the key physiological barriers encountered in in vivo CAR-T cell engineering, alongside the corresponding principles of engineered design and outlines the evolving trends in the chemical composition of delivery materials.
Shu-Yi Wu, Yi-Ming Shen, Xue-Hui Tong et al.· Critical reviews in oncology...· 0 citations
This review highlights key engineering strategies enabling in vivo CAR T-cell generation, summarizes emerging clinical research and development, and discusses future opportunities for expanding in vivo CAR T-cell therapies as scalable immunotherapy platforms.
Janani Gopalakrishnan, Bhagyashri Rathod, Sachin Puri· International Immunopharmaco...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.