Copy-number variants (CNVs) are major contributors to human disease. In Alzheimer disease (AD), APP duplications cause autosomal-dominant forms, but the role of CNVs in non-monogenic AD remains poorly characterized. We analyzed rare CNVs (frequency <1%) from 22,319 exomes (4,150 early-onset AD [EOAD, ≤65 years], 8,519 late-onset AD [LOAD], 9,650 unaffected control subjects) using harmonized calling and quality control. After identifying 17 individuals with a pathogenic CNV, we performed exome-wide and gene-set burden analyses. EOAD-affected individuals showed increased burdens of rare CNVs affecting coding genes, particularly deletions in AD-related genes. Integrated loss-of-function (LoF) analysis gathering short truncating variants with deletions showed that ABCA1 (odds ratio [OR] = 5.77 [95% confidence interval 2.25; 17.06], p = 0.0002) and ABCA7 deletions contribute to this deletion burden (OR = 2.29 [1.44; 3.65], p = 0.0006), while CTSB LoF alleles appear as candidates (OR = 5.03 [1.50; 20.71], p = 0.0089). We then performed exome-wide gene-level dosage analysis and highlighted 18 genes across five loci with a false discovery rate of <10%, including the 22q11.21 central region, where deletions were restricted to EOAD (including one de novo event) and duplications were enriched in control individuals, with intermediate frequencies in LOAD. We narrowed this locus to the SCARF2-KLHL22-MED15 region after integrating short truncating variants. Replication in 33,977 affected individuals and 362,322 control subjects confirmed association for 22q11.21 dosage with exome-wide significance (ORSCARF2 = 0.34 [0.21; 0.53]; mega-p value = 5.52 × 10-7). SCARF2 overexpression significantly increased amyloid-β uptake, congruent with duplication-associated decreased AD risk. We conclude that rare coding CNVs in a proportion of AD-associated genes and 22q11.21 deletions, including some found in DiGeorge syndrome, increase AD risk. Conversely, we identify 22q11.21 duplication as a strong AD-risk-decreasing factor.
O. Quenez, Catherine Schramm, K. Cassinari et al.· American Journal of Human Ge...· 0 citations
Importance
Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used in research and clinical settings to determine the etiology of cognitive decline and eligibility for amyloid-targeting therapies. To assist with amyloid PET evaluation and to guide clinical decision-making, images can be quantified in a standardized unit called Centiloid, the interpretation of which can vary according to the method and threshold used.
Objective
To collect Centiloid values from available studies and determine robust positivity cutoffs using data-driven methods and correspondence with visual reads.
Data Sources
PubMed search (October 2024) identified studies with Centiloid values. Corresponding authors were invited to share individual participant data. Additional data were obtained through access-controlled repositories and conference outreach (July 2024-July 2025).
Study Selection
Studies were included if they provided Centiloids, radiotracer, age, and sex.
Data Extraction and Synthesis
Each study was analyzed using a unified statistical pipeline; study estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) were fitted to Centiloid values for each study. In studies with a bimodal distribution (per integrated completed likelihood), single cutoffs for positivity were set as mean plus 2 SDs of the lower gaussian component. Using GMMs, a double-cutoff approach defined a lower certainty range using a 90% posterior probability cutoff for assignment to the low (amyloid-negative) vs high (amyloid-positive) component. An alternative Centiloid cutoff was derived from maximizing the correspondence (Cohen κ) with the binary visual reads when available.
Results
This meta-analysis included cross-sectional amyloid PET scans acquired with 5 radiotracers from 49 227 participants across 53 studies from 15 countries (mean age, 71 years; 54% female, 62% cognitively impaired). The data-driven GMM approach identified a bimodal distribution in 51 studies (n = 48 786), resulting in a single cutoff for positivity of 18 Centiloids (95% CI,16-19; I2 = 97%). The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I2 = 95%). In analyses of correspondence with binary (positive or negative) visual reads of amyloid PET scans (n = 35 045; 36 studies), Centiloids were highly predictive of visual positivity (Cohen κ, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89; I2 = 96%) with a cutoff of 27 Centiloids (95% CI, 24-30; I2 = 80%).
Conclusions and Relevance
In this individual participant data meta-analysis, positivity cutoffs converged around 18 Centiloids (data-driven) and 27 Centiloids (visual reads). Findings from a double-cutoff analysis suggest that scans in the 11 to 26 Centiloid range should be interpreted with caution depending on the context of use.
Ganna Blazhenets, David N Soleimani-Meigooni, Konstantinos Chiotis et al.· Journal of the American Medi...· 2 citations
These findings highlight the complementary roles of CSF and plasma tau biomarkers in tracking disease progression: CSF biomarkers capture early pathological changes, whereas plasma biomarkers more effectively reflect disease progression within symptomatic stages.
J. Arranz, J. Lantero-Rodríguez, Luisa Sophie Braun-Wohlfahrt et al.· EBioMedicine· 1 citation