Skip to content

Author

C. Moallemi

4 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Preprint Jul 2026

Volatility in Prediction Markets: A Structural Approach

Forward-looking volatility forecasts are central inputs to derivatives pricing, market making, risk management, and volatility-linked trading strategies, with ARCH and GARCH models serving as the canonical workhorses. Such models are natural in standard asset markets, where prices are positive-valued stochastic processes and volatility is typically inferred from return dynamics. Prediction markets have a different structure: prices are bounded probabilities, payoffs are binary, and contracts resolve at known deadlines. We develop and estimate a volatility model tailored to binary prediction markets. The model combines two economic mechanisms: a Wright-Fisher deadline-resolution component, capturing how remaining binary uncertainty is forced to resolve over time, and a Glosten-Milgrom order-flow component, capturing volatility from informed trading as reflected in spreads and volume. Using a large panel of Kalshi contracts, we show that these structural variables carry substantial forecasting power. Plain ARCH/GARCH benchmarks are dominated by structural specifications; combining the structural model with residual GARCH dynamics gives the best overall forecasts. The model also provides an interpretable measurement framework: volatility is highest near fifty-fifty prices, rises near resolution, and varies across categories with the timing and discreteness of information arrival. Economics contracts are closer to smooth deadline-resolution dynamics, while sports contracts exhibit more event-concentrated, jump-like behavior. Across major categories, category-specific fitting does not systematically improve out-of-sample performance, suggesting that the structural specification transfers beyond the pooled headline result.

Weiye Xi, C. Moallemi, Mallesh M. Pai et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Quantifying Sub-Optimality in Routing for Automated Market Makers

We provide a large-scale empirical audit of DEX routing using 2.98 million WETH-USDC swaps on Ethereum. Comparing realized routes with optimized benchmarks, we measure an average shortfall of 2.02 bps per trade or \$24 million. To attribute losses, we introduce three reproducible optimal benchmarks: a Support-Constrained Optimum (SCO) that evaluates split quality conditional on the pools actually used; a Full-Venue Optimum (FVO) that considers all available pools to quantify the value of broader pool access; and a Gas-Aware FVO (G-FVO) that augments FVO with gas costs to capture the trade-off between additional pool usage and gas expenditure. Computing these benchmarks at scale is enabled by a bisection-based algorithm for optimal routing across multiple pools for the same token pair. Two regularities emerge. First, information timeliness is crucial: moving from execution-time state to one-block lagged state optimization significantly raises mean shortfall and additional delays further degrade performance, albeit with diminishing increments; evaluated on the same stale snapshots, realized routes lie closer to optimal, indicating timing-mismatch as a key component. Second, inefficiency is heterogeneous and heavy-tailed: small trades suffer higher percentage losses, while a few extreme outliers dominate the aggregate dollar shortfalls. Finally, we demonstrate that sandwiching attacks drive a significant fraction of routing sub-optimality. Our benchmark protocol and algorithm offer a rigorous, reproducible basis for evaluating and improving information-timely, gas-aware routing.

Weiye Xi, C. Moallemi · 3 citations · ⚡1
Preprint Jul 2026

Uniform-Loss Automated Market Making for Prediction Markets

The framework of loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) is used to study how the total worst-case loss to the subsidizer is distributed across price states or over time and extended to dynamic liquidity management, showing that liquidity levels can be adjusted over time to implement a prescribed target expected cumulative loss schedule.

C. Moallemi, D. Robinson, Brian Z. Zhu · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

OS-Pruner: Pruning Chains-of-Thought of Reasoning Models via Optimal Stopping

OS-Pruner is a lightweight plug-in framework that formulates chain-of-thought pruning as an optimal stopping problem that achieves 20-60\% reduction in generation length with minimal accuracy sacrifice on diverse reasoning benchmarks and base models.

Mohammed Ehab, Aymane El Gadarri, Vivek F. Farias et al. · 0 citations