The framework of loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) is used to study how the total worst-case loss to the subsidizer is distributed across price states or over time and extended to dynamic liquidity management, showing that liquidity levels can be adjusted over time to implement a prescribed target expected cumulative loss schedule.
Abstract
Automated market makers (AMMs) for prediction markets descend from market scoring rules, where a mechanism operator subsidizes a market to aggregate beliefs about uncertain events. The existing literature has focused on bounding the total worst-case loss to the subsidizer, but has not addressed how that loss is distributed across price states or over time. We use the framework of loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) to study this distribution and introduce \textit{uniform AMMs}, defined by the property that instantaneous LVR is proportional to pool value and independent of the current token price. In a static setting, we show that for a broad class of \textit{win-martingales} -- processes that converge to 0 or 1 at a fixed resolution time -- there exists a pricing function that achieves uniform LVR under that process, and conversely, that any sufficiently regular pricing function induces a win-martingale under which it is uniform. We then extend the framework to dynamic liquidity management, showing that liquidity levels can be adjusted over time to implement a prescribed target expected cumulative loss schedule. This theory is illustrated with canonical examples of win-martingales and pricing functions. Our results can inform AMM designers and liquidity providers on how the inevitable cost of subsidizing price discovery can be shaped and controlled across both price and time.
Automated market makers (AMMs) are typically interpreted and evaluated as decentralized exchanges. Herein, we take the perspective envisioned by Balancer that an AMM can also be viewed as a portfolio technology that programmatically enforces an economic mandate. In particular, we follow the geometric mean market maker (G3M) invariant employed by that protocol in order to enforce a target-weighted portfolio. We introduce a multi-asset fee structure to the G3M under which competitive arbitrage implements a band-rebalancing strategy with mis-weighting bounded ex ante, allowing compliance with the mandate to be verified directly from the pool's observable holdings. We then compare simulated G3M portfolios against the realized performance of VBIAX, EQL, and EDOW on annualized returns and tracking error against the portfolio mandate. Across these historical case studies, and using arbitrage-only order flow, the G3M is found to outperform the incumbent funds in both metrics for certain fee ranges.
Zachary Feinstein, I. Florescu, Sean O'Leary· 0 citations
Prediction markets are attracting growing attention as trading volumes rise and their practical relevance increases. To ensure efficient price discovery, liquidity provision becomes ever more important. Due to the binary settlement structure in prediction markets, optimal market making leads to an optimization problem that is fundamentally different from the ones studied in classical settings. In this paper, we develop a stochastic control framework for prediction markets in which the market price is modeled as a conditional probability of the outcome that is generated by a transformed latent belief diffusion. A market maker selects bid and ask quotes to maximize expected terminal wealth while controlling both mark-to-market inventory risk and the settlement risk of remaining positions at resolution. We derive the associated Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman equation and characterize the unique optimal bid and ask quotes. By transforming the equation to the latent belief space and using a fixed-point argument, we prove existence and uniqueness of a classical solution and verify the resulting optimal quoting strategy. In addition, we provide a numerical analysis, which reveals how optimal liquidity provision in prediction markets depends on inventory, market beliefs, time to resolution, and risk aversion. Further, we demonstrate that the optimal quoting strategy substantially improves downside protection while preserving most of its expected profit relative to a myopic benchmark that maximizes the instantaneous expected mark-to-market profit.
Prediction markets aggregate dispersed beliefs into prices that act as probabilistic forecasts of uncertain events. Classical theory establishes a clean equivalence between forecasting accuracy and trading profit, but only for the specific automated market maker (AMM) design. However, the largest exchanges today are based on central limit order books in which informed forecasters routinely lose money while uninformed strategies can profit on simple heuristics. We resolve this discrepancy by establishing a formal equivalence between predictive accuracy and profitability. For any strictly proper scoring rule $S$, we exhibit a"proper"betting strategy that depends only on the forecaster's prediction $\mathbf{p}$ and the market price $\mathbf{q}$, and earns positive expected profit whenever $\mathbf{p}$ outperforms $\mathbf{q}$ under $S$ and the market has sufficient liquidity. Moreover, this proper betting is essentially the only strategy with such robust profitability guarantee. The proof rests on a decomposition of expected profit that strictly generalizes the classical AMM guarantee and also explains how strategies can profit without an accuracy edge. Empirically, across thousands of forecasts by AI models, proper betting is the only strategy that reliably converts accuracy into profit, and we further identify systematic forecasting personas and show how the optimal proper strategy varies across them. A month-long live deployment on Kalshi achieves $+80.33\%$ return on investment with a Sharpe ratio of $3.35$.
The Reverse Kelly Automated Market Maker (rkAMM) is introduced, the core engine of the proposed lending framework for decentralized credit and provides the foundational financial engineering required to bridge the 2 trillion global supply chain finance gap using permissionless blockchain infrastructure.
Sai Srikanth Madugula, Peplluis Esteva de la Rosa, Daya Shankar· 0 citations
We present a language-model forecasting system for merger arbitrage, a specialized high-stakes financial setting in which the task is to predict the outcome of announced M\&A deals. Unlike prior work on judgmental forecasting with LLMs, which has focused on broad mixed-topic benchmarks and short context such as news snippets, we study a setting that requires long-context reasoning over hundreds of pages of technical documents. Our system combines expert-guided context engineering with finetuning on hindsight-guided reasoning traces derived from historical deals. Given an announced deal, it outputs a probability distribution over three mutually exclusive outcomes: closing at announced terms, a higher bid, or deal termination. On an out-of-sample set of more than 400 large deals spanning 42 countries, our finetuned system achieves the best performance of any method we evaluate, reducing class-balanced Brier score to 0.151. This is 24\% below calibrated market-implied probabilities, 19\% below XGBoost, and 25-42\% below frontier language models. These results, together with ablation studies, show that LLM-based forecasting can succeed in specialized, long-context financial workflows, with hindsight-based supervision and expert-designed context playing a critical role.
Hinal Jajal, Michał Mucha, C. Sweat et al.· 0 citations
Structured retail products are unsecured bonds subject to the default risk of the issuer. We analyze the price‐setting policy of issuers with respect to this default risk. Using a long‐term data set of discount certificates in the German market, we apply a time series IVX‐approach to find that (i) quoted prices do depend on issuer default risk, but (ii) this dependency is under‐proportional. Hence, retail investors are only partially compensated for bearing issuer default risk. A long‐term analysis covering the global financial crisis, the European debt crisis, and the succeeding calm period, as well as supporting evidence from the coronavirus crisis, provides patterns consistent with a fading attention hypothesis: When default risk has left the focus of retail investors, they are no longer compensated for it, even if it becomes substantial, as in the early months of the coronavirus crisis.
R. Baule, Falk Jensen· Journal of futures markets· 0 citations