C. Sticherling

Undetected Heart Failure in Cardiology: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Outcome.

Prophylactic implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Abstract Introduction Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death worldwide, of which coronary artery disease is the most common form. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a serious complication following acute myocardial infarction (MI), accounting for the highest percentage of all deaths in this population. Currently implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) provide an acceptable method of primary prevention of SCD. However, the current literature is heterogeneous with regard to studies evaluating the benefits of ICDs for the primary prevention of SCD after MI, particularly relating to the timing of ICD implantation, risk stratification of patients for ICD implant selection and reporting non-rhythmic deaths after ICD implantation. Methods and analysis A meta-analysis will be performed to estimate the pooled effect size of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the relationship between prophylactic transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) implantation and other medical therapies for primary prevention of SCD after MI. A comprehensive literature search and review will be performed using electronic medical databases including Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE (Ovid Platform), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, ProQuest (Health and Medicine) and CINAHL (EBSCO) from January 1980 to June 2025. The literature search will be limited to peer-reviewed original studies carried out in human subjects and published in English. Type of study design will be limited to RCTs. The systematic review and meta-analysis will be developed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2024 edition) and conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 guidelines. Data analysis will be performed according to a structured and predetermined analysis plan. The primary outcome of the study will be all-cause-mortality, for which Hazard Ratios (HRs) will be reported as a measure of effect with 95% CI. Based on data availability, subgroup analysis will be carried out. The effect sizes will be reported based on a random effects model. Expected study outcomes and dissemination This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate and provide primary evidence for the effectiveness of prophylactic implantation of TV-ICDs on all-cause mortality in patients who experienced MI, aiming for primary prevention of SCD after MI. The primary prevention of SCD after MI is an important goal to reduce community incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, improving patient survival rates and their quality of life after MI. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests currently have a survival rate of less than 10% and could result in long-lasting neurological damage in those who survive. PROSPERO registration CRD42023456995.

Mortality reduction with implanted defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden death after Myocardial Infarction: temporal trends in the PROFID study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM Randomized trials conducted in the early 2000s established the survival benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after myocardial infarction. However, management of myocardial infarction and heart failure has substantially evolved since that time. We investigated whether the estimated association between primary prevention ICD implantation in post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced LVEF and mortality reduction has changed over time. METHODS We analyzed individual participant data from 32,214 patients with LVEF ≤35% after myocardial infarction included in the PROFID pooled cohort, comprising 7,477 patients carrying a primary prevention ICD (ICD patients) and 24,737 patients without an ICD (non-ICD patients). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Propensity scores were estimated using multivariable logistic regression including age, sex, LVEF, renal function, and diabetes, and overlap weighting was applied to balance treatment groups. Time period-specific analyses were performed across three prespecified time periods defined by inclusion year: 1995-2004, 2005-2014, and 2015-2020. Weighted cumulative mortality curves were generated for each time period. Temporal changes in the estimated association between ICD implantation and mortality reduction were assessed using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS A total of 12,097 deaths occurred during a mean follow-up of 43.7 months. The estimated association between ICD implantation and mortality changed significantly across time (P for interaction <0.001). In weighted time period-specific analyses, the estimated mortality reduction associated with ICD implantation progressively decreased over more recent periods. The hazard ratio for ICD versus non-ICD patients was 0.54 (95% CI 0.47-0.62; P<0.001) in 1995-2004, 0.67 (95% CI 0.62-0.72; P<0.001) in 2005-2014, and 0.89 (95% CI 0.73-1.07; P=0.221) in 2015-2020, with negligible separation of the weighted cumulative mortality curves in the most recent time period. CONCLUSIONS In this analysis including a large cohort of post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced LVEF, the estimated mortality reduction associated with primary prevention ICD implantation progressively decreased over time.