Mortality reduction with implanted defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden death after Myocardial Infarction: temporal trends in the PROFID study.
In this analysis including a large cohort of post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced LVEF, the estimated mortality reduction associated with primary prevention ICD implantation progressively decreased over time.
Abstract
Background
AND
Aim
Randomized trials conducted in the early 2000s established the survival benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after myocardial infarction. However, management of myocardial infarction and heart failure has substantially evolved since that time. We investigated whether the estimated association between primary prevention ICD implantation in post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced LVEF and mortality reduction has changed over time.
Methods
We analyzed individual participant data from 32,214 patients with LVEF ≤35% after myocardial infarction included in the PROFID pooled cohort, comprising 7,477 patients carrying a primary prevention ICD (ICD patients) and 24,737 patients without an ICD (non-ICD patients). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Propensity scores were estimated using multivariable logistic regression including age, sex, LVEF, renal function, and diabetes, and overlap weighting was applied to balance treatment groups. Time period-specific analyses were performed across three prespecified time periods defined by inclusion year: 1995-2004, 2005-2014, and 2015-2020. Weighted cumulative mortality curves were generated for each time period. Temporal changes in the estimated association between ICD implantation and mortality reduction were assessed using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model.
Results
A total of 12,097 deaths occurred during a mean follow-up of 43.7 months. The estimated association between ICD implantation and mortality changed significantly across time (P for interaction <0.001). In weighted time period-specific analyses, the estimated mortality reduction associated with ICD implantation progressively decreased over more recent periods. The hazard ratio for ICD versus non-ICD patients was 0.54 (95% CI 0.47-0.62; P<0.001) in 1995-2004, 0.67 (95% CI 0.62-0.72; P<0.001) in 2005-2014, and 0.89 (95% CI 0.73-1.07; P=0.221) in 2015-2020, with negligible separation of the weighted cumulative mortality curves in the most recent time period.
Conclusions
In this analysis including a large cohort of post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced LVEF, the estimated mortality reduction associated with primary prevention ICD implantation progressively decreased over time.
This is the first meta-analysis reviewing post-MI patients with LVEF 36-50 with a clinically relevant unmet need for patients who carry a substantial burden of SCD despite being outside current ICD eligibility criteria.
E. Lau, Ahmed Abotabekh, Xin-Ting Liu et al.· Heart· 0 citations
A systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate and provide primary evidence for the effectiveness of prophylactic implantation of TV-ICDs on all-cause mortality in patients who experienced MI, aiming for primary prevention of SCD after MI.
A. Amarasekera, Anoja W. Gunaratne, J. Kovoor et al.· BMJ Open· 0 citations
Chagas cardiomyopathy was associated with lower composite risk and the wide confidence interval and small population at risk in the late period mean that absence of a detectable difference should not be read as evidence of equivalent risk.
J. P. Guzmán, Pedro Díaz Uberti, Camila Rosello et al.· Frontiers in Cardiovascular...· 0 citations
Among CTO patients with LVEF with LVEF, VA and mortality were frequent, particularly with OMT, supporting prospective studies to confirm benefit and refine patient selection for revascularization strategies.
Ahmad Jabri, Laith Alhuneafat, Omar Obeidat et al.· Future Cardiology· 0 citations
A cumulative electrical risk score from the standard electrocardiogram was independently associated with appropriate ICD therapy and may add risk information beyond LVEF and warrant prospective, multicenter validation.
Muhammed Rıdvan Ersoysal, Rauf Avcı, Fatih Han Kumtaş et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
The incidence of sudden cardiac arrest recurrence following defibrillator implantation is high across all patient groups, regardless of aetiology, and sustained ventricular tachycardia as the indication for device implantation predicts a higher incidence.
Mara Adjic, F. Adjic, Nikolina Konstantinovic et al.· Medicinski pregled· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.