Skip to content

Author

D. van de Ven

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

Mitigation implications of remaining carbon budget allocation rules for Mediterranean countries

The Mediterranean Basin is a climate change hotspot, experiencing accelerated warming and strong environmental vulnerability. Mediterranean Sea surface temperatures have increased by approximately 1.5 °C over the past four decades, underscoring the urgency of coordinated mitigation efforts. In this context, this study examines how alternative allocation criteria for distributing the remaining carbon budget compatible with the Paris Agreement (well below 2 °C) affect emission pathways among the 21 signatory countries of the Barcelona Convention. Using a mitigation pathway derived from the Global Change Analysis Model, the analysis evaluates emissions trajectories from 2030—anchored in current Nationally Determined Contributions—through 2100. Five allocation principles are assessed: Grandfathering, Per Capita, Per Capita Convergence, Equal Cumulative Per Capita, and Ability to Pay, each reflecting different trade-offs between equity and feasibility. Results indicate that, irrespective of the allocation rule, rapid and sustained decarbonisation is unavoidable. At current emission levels, the regional carbon budget would be exhausted by 2035, requiring average annual reductions of approximately 6% between 2030 and 2050 to meet global targets. While population-based criteria yield the largest regional budget and are more equitable, they imply more disruptive transitions. In contrast, emissions-based approaches are more feasible but risk reinforcing existing inequalities. These findings highlight significant implications for fossil fuel-dependent economies and stress the importance of regional cooperation. The Barcelona Convention emerges as a key platform to facilitate equitable burden-sharing and coordinated climate action in the Mediterranean region.

Marίa Victoria Román, Emmie Vicedo-Choques, Arkaitz Usubiaga‐Liaño et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

An across and within country analysis of who bears the costs of EU decarbonisation

Addressing climate change with the necessary urgency will only be successful if climate policies are perceived as socially fair and equitable by the majority of the population. However, as recognised in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), energy and climate modelling still struggles to bring together detailed economic and inequality impacts of climate policies. To help reduce this gap, we link GCAM-Europe, a geographical expansion of a well-established integrated assessment model, with MEDUSA, a tool for high-resolution distributional analysis. Our analysis explores how different implementations of the European Union (EU)‘s climate policy portfolio affect various consumer groups across and within Member States. It finds that a general EU-wide carbon price, while cost-efficient, has regressive impacts, disproportionately burdening low-income Member States and households. In contrast, policies based on national plans (NECPs) are less regressive. Gender and the urban-rural dimension also play an important role, with man-headed and rural households being the most affected.

E. Alonso-Epelde, X. García-Muros, Jon Sampedro et al. · 0 citations