LLM-based retrievers have become a fundamental component of modern information retrieval systems. The paradigm of"rewrite-then-retriev"introduces explicit reasoning before retrieval. In addition, implicit-reasoning retrievers such as GIRCSE and LaSER improve efficiency by replacing explicit reasoning with soft tokens. Although these methods demonstrated competitive performance on reasoning-intensive retrieval benchmarks, they struggle to address the mismatch between the objectives of retrieval and generation. In this work, we propose SHIFT ($\textbf{S}$elf-reconstruction $\textbf{H}$arnesses $\textbf{I}$mplicit $\textbf{F}$ine-grained $\textbf{T}$hinking for Retrieval), a retrieval training framework based on LLMs. Firstly, we transfer LLMs into reasoning-efficient retrievers with residual projection and task-oriented bidirectional attention aggregation in the latent space. Secondly, we alleviate the mismatch between contrastive learning and implicit reasoning using fine-grained next-token-prediction-based reconstruction. Extensive experiments on reasoning-intensive retrieval benchmarks show that SHIFT consistently outperforms other widely used retrievers. We also carried out a detailed analysis to illustrate how our method works.
Yuxiao Luo, Da Li, Mingjie Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Large Vision Language Models have integrated reasoning capabilities, elevating cognitive performance to new levels. However, existing evaluations either focus solely on perception or rely on specific domains such as maths or coding. Evaluation for reasoning capabilities that align with an open-world environment is still required, especially one that considers perception and reasoning jointly. To bridge this gap, we propose to evaluate LVLMs by exploiting visual illusions as a diagnostic tool. Visual illusions are phenomena in which the human visual system misinterprets objective signals, resulting in an understanding that deviates from reality. We constructed Illusion-Reasoning, a benchmark of illusion images collected from the real world, incorporating diverse annotated question-answer pairs. Based on Illusion-Reasoning, we show that the reasoning capabilities of a wide range of LVLMs are not as advanced as claimed. Our work provides new insights into LVLMs and offers future directions for optimisation. Our project is publicly available at https://github.com/zhaoliangjie55/EMNLP2026_Illusion.
Liang Zhao, Jiaqing Lyu, Kexin Tang et al.· 0 citations