This work constructed Illusion-Reasoning, a benchmark of illusion images collected from the real world, incorporating diverse annotated question-answer pairs, and shows that the reasoning capabilities of a wide range of LVLMs are not as advanced as claimed.
Abstract
Large Vision Language Models have integrated reasoning capabilities, elevating cognitive performance to new levels. However, existing evaluations either focus solely on perception or rely on specific domains such as maths or coding. Evaluation for reasoning capabilities that align with an open-world environment is still required, especially one that considers perception and reasoning jointly. To bridge this gap, we propose to evaluate LVLMs by exploiting visual illusions as a diagnostic tool. Visual illusions are phenomena in which the human visual system misinterprets objective signals, resulting in an understanding that deviates from reality. We constructed Illusion-Reasoning, a benchmark of illusion images collected from the real world, incorporating diverse annotated question-answer pairs. Based on Illusion-Reasoning, we show that the reasoning capabilities of a wide range of LVLMs are not as advanced as claimed. Our work provides new insights into LVLMs and offers future directions for optimisation. Our project is publicly available at https://github.com/zhaoliangjie55/EMNLP2026_Illusion.
This paper develops a comprehensive where-what-how taxonomy that characterizes where situational illusions occur, what targets they take, and how they arise, and introduces MSIBench, a benchmark designed to assess the discrimination, understanding, and reasoning capabilities of MLLMs under situational illusions.
Zhi-Ming Yang, Zhuoxi Xiong, Dong-Lin Zhou et al.· 0 citations
LookBack, a training-free LVLM response scoring method that augments token likelihood with visual lookback score, a lightweight measure of how strongly each response token refers to image tokens, consistently improves Best-of-$N$ selection over existing baselines with negligible additional overhead.
Beomsik Cho, Jin-Ha Kim, Dongseok Lee et al.· 0 citations
VSI is not a universal best abstention signal; it is a sample-intrinsic indicator of vision-ignoring failure, best used as a conditional ensemble component.
For the coarse attributes the authors study, MLLMs encode the visual evidence but cannot reliably control their reliance on it, indicating that for the coarse attributes they study, MLLMs cannot reliably control their reliance on it.
Jiaang Li, Chengzu Li, Zhaochong An et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
ChartProbe is introduced, a diagnostic framework whose probes are generated directly from the code that renders each chart, so every gold answer is exact by construction, needs no human annotation, and attributes each failure to a single skill.
Evaluating representative proprietary and open-source multimodal models, it is found that visual reasoning is strongly model- and environment-dependent, with no single setting consistently dominating across tasks.