Skip to content

Author

Diganto Ghosh

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access 2025

Programmatic Governance using Policy-as-Code and ML for Dynamic Compliance Enforcement

In the intricate world of laws and regulations we have today, companies require more than just non-flexible guidelines to be on the right side of the law. They require systems that are not only adaptable but that also change with them in real time. This document investigates a futuristic programmatic governance way of handling compliance issues by combining Policy-as-Code (PaC) and Machine Learning (ML). The core of the idea is in the impairments of manual policy enforcement and rigid compliance checks that are always behind in changes of business operations or regulations. Organizations turn policies into executable code so as they can automate enforcement in distributed environments, thus achieving both uniformity and accountability as a result. Moreover, when combined with ML, these machines become capable of learning from previous compliance behavior, anticipating future violations, and even suggesting the necessary preventive measures. The approach proposed in this study consists of the following steps: writing the policy with a declarative language such as Open Policy Agent (OPA), linking the policy to an event-driven architecture, and allowing ML models to receive and analyze the data in real-time, be they anomaly or risk cases. The main feature of this work is the presentation of an architecture where cloud-native is integrated with dynamic policy engines and ML classifiers, enabling organizations to respond to compliance drifts as they happennot after. The architecture demonstrated in a multi-cloud case shows how it identified access control violations and went ahead to change settings automatically without requiring the involvement of a human. The findings, thus, indicate faster response time, shrinkage of compliance gaps, and notable cost savings as compared to the traditional governance models. This is, in fact, a very strong argument for using a live, learning compliance infrastructure that can not only adjust itself to changes but can actually benefit from them instead of perishing, as in the case of checklists.

Sivadeep Katangoori, Diganto Ghosh · 0 citations