2025· International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies· Vol 6, pp. 158-167· 0 citations
TL;DR
This document investigates a futuristic programmatic governance way of handling compliance issues by combining Policy-as-Code (PaC) and Machine Learning (ML), indicating faster response time, shrinkage of compliance gaps, and notable cost savings as compared to the traditional governance models.
Abstract
In the intricate world of laws and regulations we have today, companies require more than just non-flexible guidelines to be on the right side of the law. They require systems that are not only adaptable but that also change with them in real time. This document investigates a futuristic programmatic governance way of handling compliance issues by combining Policy-as-Code (PaC) and Machine Learning (ML). The core of the idea is in the impairments of manual policy enforcement and rigid compliance checks that are always behind in changes of business operations or regulations. Organizations turn policies into executable code so as they can automate enforcement in distributed environments, thus achieving both uniformity and accountability as a result. Moreover, when combined with ML, these machines become capable of learning from previous compliance behavior, anticipating future violations, and even suggesting the necessary preventive measures. The approach proposed in this study consists of the following steps: writing the policy with a declarative language such as Open Policy Agent (OPA), linking the policy to an event-driven architecture, and allowing ML models to receive and analyze the data in real-time, be they anomaly or risk cases. The main feature of this work is the presentation of an architecture where cloud-native is integrated with dynamic policy engines and ML classifiers, enabling organizations to respond to compliance drifts as they happennot after. The architecture demonstrated in a multi-cloud case shows how it identified access control violations and went ahead to change settings automatically without requiring the involvement of a human. The findings, thus, indicate faster response time, shrinkage of compliance gaps, and notable cost savings as compared to the traditional governance models. This is, in fact, a very strong argument for using a live, learning compliance infrastructure that can not only adjust itself to changes but can actually benefit from them instead of perishing, as in the case of checklists.
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) compliance has shifted from voluntary best practice to enforceable legal obligation across major global jurisdictions. Frameworks such as the European Union's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), the United...
Experiments demonstrate that Code-as-Auditor delivers more accurate and evidence-backed evaluations, enabling automated compliance regulation checking grounded in explicit regulatory criteria and improves the logical consistency of the generated code and the traceability of outcomes.
Jisoo Kim, Taeyoon Kwack, Jin-Woo Jang et al.· 1 citation
A methodology to systematically analyze and dissect existing approaches to define and enforce policy found in the wild is proposed to define and enforce policy found in the wild in GenAI applications.
This work proposes ARIA as a finance-specific reference architecture and falsifiable research agenda for agent-population governance and organizes six capabilities across normative-accountability, execution-control, and assurance-learning planes: policy specification, population-level observed-versus-expected behavior...
José Manuel de la Chica Rodríguez, Juan Manuel Vera D'Iaz, Pablo Delgado Romero· 0 citations
This paper covers what actually happens when financial institutions deploy AI in their GRC functions, and examines the difference between an AI system that catches financial crime and one that floods investigators with noise.
Abhishek Kakkar, Sonal Kapoor· International Journal of Mod...· 0 citations
Governance-as-Code (GaC), a framework of 43 machine-checkable acceptance criteria across six compliance modules that run in a CI/CD pipeline and emit Article-indexed audit evidence, is delivered and the actual Rego policy code is shown, showing the actual Rego policy code rather than merely describing it.
Rudrendu Kumar Paul, S. Nandy· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.