Skip to content

Author

Hannah E. Goldstein

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Jul 2026

Thalamic neuromodulation for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: a case series evaluating deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation.

OBJECTIVE Children with generalized or multifocal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) without a clearly localizable and safely resectable seizure focus present a significant clinical challenge, as traditional resective interventions are often not viable. Emerging evidence supports the use of neuromodulation-particularly deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS)-for generalized and multifocal epilepsy in adults. However, safety and efficacy data for thalamic neuromodulation in pediatric populations remain limited. This single-institution case series describes, to our knowledge, the largest pediatric cohort treated with thalamic DBS or RNS for generalized or multifocal DRE, providing descriptive data on safety and seizure burden. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients with DRE who underwent thalamic neuromodulation using RNS or DBS at Seattle Children's Hospital between January 2020 and July 2025 with at least 6 months of follow-up. Clinical, surgical, and seizure outcome data were collected, including seizure frequency and complications. Seizure outcomes were stratified into categorical frequency bins, and a trend analysis was performed to evaluate postoperative shifts in seizure burden. RESULTS Twenty-six patients (mean age 14.5, range 6-20 years) underwent thalamic neuromodulation with DBS (n = 12) or RNS (n = 14). The centromedian nucleus was the target in 24 cases; 1 patient each underwent targeting of the anterior nucleus and pulvinar nucleus. At the last follow-up (median 30.2 months), 65.4% of patients met the responder criteria (≥ 50% seizure reduction), with a higher response in the DBS group (83.3%) compared with the RNS group (50.0%). The median seizure reduction was 75.7% for DBS and 37.5% for RNS. A significant downward shift in seizure frequency was observed postoperatively across the entire cohort (p = 0.031), including among patients with the highest baseline seizure burden. No intraoperative complications occurred. Two patients (7.7%) required device explantation, 1 due to infection and 1 due to behavioral side effects, and 1 patient discontinued therapy without explantation. No instances of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy or hardware malfunction were observed. CONCLUSIONS Thalamic neuromodulation using DBS and RNS was safe and well tolerated in pediatric patients with DRE, including multifocal and generalized seizure onsets. Meaningful seizure reduction was observed across a range of epilepsy phenotypes, with a trend toward greater benefit in the DBS group. These findings support thalamic neuromodulation as a promising treatment option in children with nonlesional DRE and highlight the need for prospective multicenter studies with extended follow-up.

Dominic Nistal, Benjamin D. Edmonds, Adriel Barrios-Anderson et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Comparative multicenter evaluation of thalamic neuromodulation for treatment-resistant epilepsy in children.

OBJECTIVE Use of neuromodulation strategies targeting thalamic nuclei, including deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), for treatment of pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is increasing, despite limited evidence for efficacy and safety. We present the initial results from the Comparative Multicenter Evaluation of Thalamic Neuromodulation for Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy in Children consortium, which was created to study thalamic modulation in children with DRE. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of children who underwent thalamic DBS or RNS for DRE between January 2015 and December 2024 across 12 centers. Primary outcomes were percent seizure reduction, Engel class, and responder rates (>50% seizure reduction) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included antiseizure medications and surgical complications. Differences were quantified using ordinal logistic regression, generalized estimating equations with center clustering, and mixed-effects models. Stratified analyses were performed by thalamic target (centromedian vs. anterior nucleus) and epilepsy diagnosis (Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, generalized, focal, and multifocal). RESULTS Among the 221 included patients (111 DBS, 110 RNS) included, DBS and RNS achieved comparable Engel scores and 12-month responder rates, but different temporal trajectories were observed. There was a significant device × time interaction (odds ratio = 1.10/month, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.20, p = .04), with RNS response rates increasing from 26.9% at 3 months to 55.6% at 12 months (paired p < .001) but with DBS response rates reaching 41.7% at 3 months and remaining comparatively stable over time. DBS achieved significantly higher 12-month seizure freedom (9.5% vs. 1.2%, p = .03). Neither thalamic target selection nor diagnosis predicted seizure outcome. Safety profiles were equivalent. SIGNIFICANCE This multicenter analysis provides pediatric-specific data to inform surgical indications, device selection, and preoperative counseling. DBS and RNS were effective for treatment of pediatric DRE, with equivalent 12-month seizure outcomes but different temporal trajectories. DBS provided earlier seizure control and higher rates of overall seizure freedom.

S. Tenhoeve, N. Warsi, Allison M Ludwick et al. · 0 citations