Skip to content
Open access

Comparative multicenter evaluation of thalamic neuromodulation for treatment-resistant epilepsy in children.

Jul 2026 · Epilepsia · 0 citations · 39 references
Medicine

TL;DR

DBS and RNS were effective for treatment of pediatric DRE, with equivalent 12-month seizure outcomes but different temporal trajectories.

Abstract

Objective

Use of neuromodulation strategies targeting thalamic nuclei, including deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), for treatment of pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is increasing, despite limited evidence for efficacy and safety. We present the initial results from the Comparative Multicenter Evaluation of Thalamic Neuromodulation for Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy in Children consortium, which was created to study thalamic modulation in children with DRE.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of children who underwent thalamic DBS or RNS for DRE between January 2015 and December 2024 across 12 centers. Primary outcomes were percent seizure reduction, Engel class, and responder rates (>50% seizure reduction) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included antiseizure medications and surgical complications. Differences were quantified using ordinal logistic regression, generalized estimating equations with center clustering, and mixed-effects models. Stratified analyses were performed by thalamic target (centromedian vs. anterior nucleus) and epilepsy diagnosis (Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, generalized, focal, and multifocal).

Results

Among the 221 included patients (111 DBS, 110 RNS) included, DBS and RNS achieved comparable Engel scores and 12-month responder rates, but different temporal trajectories were observed. There was a significant device × time interaction (odds ratio = 1.10/month, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-1.20, p = .04), with RNS response rates increasing from 26.9% at 3 months to 55.6% at 12 months (paired p < .001) but with DBS response rates reaching 41.7% at 3 months and remaining comparatively stable over time. DBS achieved significantly higher 12-month seizure freedom (9.5% vs. 1.2%, p = .03). Neither thalamic target selection nor diagnosis predicted seizure outcome. Safety profiles were equivalent.

Significance

This multicenter analysis provides pediatric-specific data to inform surgical indications, device selection, and preoperative counseling. DBS and RNS were effective for treatment of pediatric DRE, with equivalent 12-month seizure outcomes but different temporal trajectories. DBS provided earlier seizure control and higher rates of overall seizure freedom.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Jul 2026

Thalamic neuromodulation for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: a case series evaluating deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation.

Thalamic neuromodulation using DBS and RNS was safe and well tolerated in pediatric patients with DRE, including multifocal and generalized seizure onsets, with a trend toward greater benefit in the DBS group.

Dominic Nistal, Benjamin D. Edmonds, Adriel Barrios-Anderson et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Responsive Neurostimulation Therapy Outcomes in Two Small Bilateral Thalamic and Corticothalamic Subgroups of Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy—A Single-Center Experience

Although bilateral thalamic targets were selected at the authors' center more often, both bilateral thalamic and corticothalamic RNS approaches provided seizure frequency reduction, and the majority of patients, including non-responders, reported seizure severity alleviation.

Ramya Krothapally, Ghazala Perven, D. Veerapaneni et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

A comprehensive review of deep brain stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy

DBS represents an important therapeutic option for DRE, expanding the scope of neuromodulation beyond traditional surgical approaches and further studies are required to refine patient selection, improve targeting strategies, and optimize stimulation paradigms.

Ryota Sasaki, Masako Kinoshita, Abbas F. Sadikot et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Long-term neuropsychiatric outcomes after neuromodulation in epilepsy patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neuromodulation for drug-resistant epilepsy is associated with modest improvements in depression and quality of life without meaningful cognitive deterioration over follow-up durations of 6 months to 14 years.

Margil Ranpariya, Gurleen Kaur, H. Shallwani et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Pulvinar and anterior nucleus of the thalamus dual-network neuromodulation for complex epilepsies.

Combined four-lead ANT/PUL DBS appears safe and effective for patients with drug-resistant posterior quadrant and temporal lobe epilepsies and dual-network neuromodulation may provide greater flexibility to individually optimize neuromodulation for complex seizure networks.

Gloria Ortiz-Guerrero, Asra Tanwir, Ashar Farooqi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Invasive network neuromodulation for insular epilepsy: A three-center retrospective study.

This study expands the limited literature on insular neuromodulation by demonstrating effectiveness of RNS and CSS, suggesting potential benefit from combined thalamocortical targeting, and defining parasagittal trajectories as a surgical approach for optimal lead proximity.

Raunak Singh, N. Gregg, K. Starnes et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.