The second Multilingual Conversational Speech Language Model (MLC-SLM) Challenge evaluates two tasks over complete, unsegmented multilingual conversations: speaker diarization and recognition (Task 1) and conversational speech understanding (Task 2). Neither task provides oracle utterance boundaries or speaker labels at evaluation, and Task 2 provides no question-answer training set. For Task 1, we fine-tune VibeVoice-ASR-7B with random leading-silence cropping, consistent timestamp correction, and an exponential moving average (EMA) training strategy. For Task 2, we construct synthetic question-answer pairs through multimodal candidate generation, silent-audio filtering, and distribution-matched augmentation, and fine-tune Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct for tagged direct answering. On the Task 1 evaluation set, cropping reduces tcpMER from 18.30% to 17.27%, and EMA further reduces it to 16.73%. On the Task 2 evaluation set, jointly applying distribution-matched augmentation and tagged direct answering raises accuracy from 83.0% to 86.0%.
Kexin Shi, Renhe Sun, Yuge Huang et al.· 0 citations
DCASE~2026 Task~5 introduces Audio-Dependent Question Answering (ADQA), which tests whether large audio-language models answer from the audio rather than from textual priors. An Audio-Dependency Filtering (ADF) pipeline combines silent-audio probing, per-option perplexity, a large language model (LLM) commonsense check, and human review to remove items solvable from text alone. The 3000 items that pass form the ADQA-Bench evaluation set, spanning music, speech, and environmental audio. The inaugural edition draws 14 teams and 36 submissions across two tracks defined by total parameter count (up to 100B and under 10B). A Chung-Ang University ensemble of MOSS-Audio-8B-Thinking and Qwen3-Omni-30B reaches the top overall accuracy at \pct{58.33}, and a MOSS-only configuration from the same team leads the sub-10B track at \pct{57.30}. Across the 30 submissions with a comparable development score, evaluation accuracy falls by 11.91 percentage points (pp) on average (median 10.91\,pp) on the hidden evaluation split, which is designed to be harder than the development split. The most common building blocks are: the MOSS-Audio-8B-Thinking backbone (13 of 36 submissions), Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning on AudioMCQ-StrongAC, and preference or reinforcement-learning objectives -- Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) in five teams, Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (GDPO) in two. At test time, prompt engineering is near-universal, and majority or choice-permutation voting is common. Every system misses the same set of 233 evaluation items.
Haolin He, Renhe Sun, Zheqi Dai et al.· 0 citations
