DCASE~2026 Task~5 introduces Audio-Dependent Question Answering (ADQA), which tests whether large audio-language models answer from the audio rather than from textual priors. An Audio-Dependency Filtering (ADF) pipeline combines silent-audio probing, per-option perplexity, a large language model (LLM) commonsense check, and human review to remove items solvable from text alone. The 3000 items that pass form the ADQA-Bench evaluation set, spanning music, speech, and environmental audio. The inaugural edition draws 14 teams and 36 submissions across two tracks defined by total parameter count (up to 100B and under 10B). A Chung-Ang University ensemble of MOSS-Audio-8B-Thinking and Qwen3-Omni-30B reaches the top overall accuracy at \pct{58.33}, and a MOSS-only configuration from the same team leads the sub-10B track at \pct{57.30}. Across the 30 submissions with a comparable development score, evaluation accuracy falls by 11.91 percentage points (pp) on average (median 10.91\,pp) on the hidden evaluation split, which is designed to be harder than the development split. The most common building blocks are: the MOSS-Audio-8B-Thinking backbone (13 of 36 submissions), Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning on AudioMCQ-StrongAC, and preference or reinforcement-learning objectives -- Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) in five teams, Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (GDPO) in two. At test time, prompt engineering is near-universal, and majority or choice-permutation voting is common. Every system misses the same set of 233 evaluation items.
Audio-Dependent Question Answering (ADQA) requires Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) to answer questions whose correct answers depend on the given audio content. Successful ADQA requires accurate audio perception, identification of question-relevant evidence, and cross-modal reasoning. Using the official ADQA dataset of DCASE 2026 Task 5, we investigate reasoning-oriented post-training with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) and inference-time LoRA rescaling for both Qwen2.5-Omni and MOSS-Audio-8B-Thinking. We introduce a structured Chain-of-Thought (CoT) framework that decomposes the reasoning process into question analysis, question type, audio evidence, and reasoning. We then analyze how task-specific LoRA adaptation affects the two backbones and further explore inference-time rescaling of trained LoRA adapters. Experiments on the development set reveal markedly backbone-dependent behavior: post-training improves the Qwen-based systems but substantially degrades MOSS-Audio under our supervised fine-tuning configuration. Moderate LoRA rescaling further improves the best Qwen system's top-1 accuracy from 58.93% to 61.05% and partially restores the performance of the fine-tuned MOSS-Audio models, while the best MOSS-Audio system achieves 67.70% top-1 accuracy. Our submitted systems ranked third overall and second among lightweight systems under 10B parameters in the challenge.
Long-video question answering (QA) forces multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to work within a tight frame budget, so the choice of frames largely decides whether a question can be answered at all. The standard recipe scores every frame against the question with a pretrained image–text matching (ITM) model and keeps the top scorers. A fundamental mismatch underlies this recipe: ITM models are trained on short, concrete visual descriptions, while QA questions are interrogative and often involve abstract terms. Scored against the question alone, the ITM yields a near-random signal whenever the question is not a direct image–text match, such as one asking for the temporal order of scenes. In our LongVideoBench diagnostic analysis, the score collapses even on benchmark-provided answer-relevant frames, with more than half falling into a near-zero region —not because the encoder is faulty, but because it behaves exactly as it was trained to. We argue that this format mismatch should be absorbed at the two ends of the pipeline while the encoder itself stays frozen. On the input side, a type-conditioned routed pipeline reformulates each question into a single ITM-aligned description by selectively applying grounding, decomposition, and constrained synthesis. The ITM therefore receives exactly one description per frame, preserving the per-frame matching cost of a standard single-query baseline. On the output side, because the score distribution remains polarized and answer frames are scattered in time, we replace top- $K$ selection with a parameter-free Rosin threshold followed by a temporal maximal-marginal-relevance (MMR) step that uses frame positions alone. Across three benchmarks (LongVideoBench, Video-MME, MLVU) and and four backbones (Qwen2-VL, Qwen2.5-VL, LLaVA-OneVision, LLaVA-Video), the resulting training-free pipeline, RECAST, consistently outperforms recent frame-selection baselines without modifying the ITM encoder.
S. Han, Thang Vu, Junyeong Kim· IEEE Access· 0 citations
FinMMEval 2026 Task 1 evaluates multilingual financial multiple-choice question answering in English, Chinese, Arabic, and Hindi. The task tests whether systems can select the correct answer to finance questions involving domain terminology, numerical interpretation, and conceptual financial reasoning across languages and scripts. The final-test set contains 800 questions, with 200 questions per language; gold answers were withheld during submission, and each language was ranked independently by accuracy. The final leaderboards contain 13 English, 11 Chinese, 11 Arabic, and 10 Hindi ranked submissions. Top accuracies range from 92.0% in Hindi to 97.5% in English and Arabic, with the same leading teams appearing near the top across all four languages. The documented systems used retrieval augmentation, direct answer-option scoring, language-specific prompting, selective self-consistency, confidence checks, and LLM-based review stages.
Zhuohan Xie, Yuyang Dai, R. Elbadry et al.· 1 citation
FinMMEval 2026 Task 2 evaluates short-answer financial question answering over multilingual evidence. Each final-test item pairs an English question with financial statements and news in English, Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, and Greek. Participating systems submit one concise answer per item in JSONL format. The final-test set contains 256 items, split evenly between easy and expert tiers; each tier contains four question templates instantiated over 32 company-report groups. Gold answers were withheld during submission, and systems were ranked by macro-averaged item-level ROUGE-1 F1 against organizer-held reference answers. The final leaderboard includes 12 ranked submissions. The strongest systems are closely clustered, with the top four separated by less than one percentage point in ROUGE-1 F1. The submitted system papers document retrieval-augmented generation, cross-lingual evidence handling, structured prompting, answer compression, and validation strategies.
Zhuohan Xie, Xueqing Peng, Georgi N. Georgiev et al.· 1 citation
Multilingual evaluations report accuracy at a single output-token cap, but languages need different numbers of tokens to express the same content, so the cap is a hidden experimental variable. We test whether the native-vs-translate gap on MGSM (German, Thai, Swahili) is a token-budget artifact for Qwen3-8B and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct under four prompting strategies. The measured gap swings by up to 57 points across budgets, length normalization moves it by up to 38.9 points where the cap binds, and at tight caps normalization can reverse which strategy scores higher. We prospectively froze the sweep's three Qwen peaks and its near-zero value at 1024 and evaluated them on 540,000 independently hard-capped decodes: a second frozen family of six Holm-corrected tests rejects every null. The frozen test at $B^*=1024$ still fails to reject because native accuracy has already saturated there; above saturation, the residual difference is a strategy-performance gap, not an identified reasoning deficit. The same truncation channel prices a cost-ordered adaptation ladder: a cross-fitted Thai vocabulary extension closes 0.0 points of the gap at the frozen budget and 4.9 points where 19% of traces still truncate. A third frozen family varies only the announced budget at a fixed enforced cap; announcing 128 rather than 2048 tokens moves Thai native accuracy by 5.1 points, so accuracy is not a function of the enforced cap alone. A correct-emission timing identity computed from one long-cap run matches the three pre-specified MGSM peaks to 0.65 points and, in an exploratory Qwen-only analysis of three further benchmarks, tracks held-out items to 0.92 points, locating the peak exactly in five of seven cells. Treat the output cap as an independent variable and report accuracy across the budget regime, not at a single budget.
Audio clustering is a fundamental task for organizing rapidly growing speech collections, supporting applications such as conversational analysis and speech-driven discovery. However, existing methods rely on fixed acoustic similarity metrics or ASR-based text pipelines, limiting their ability to reorganize the same audio collection under different user-specified perspectives, especially when clustering depends on both linguistic and paralinguistic cues. We introduce audio multi-perspective clustering, where a model directly partitions speech recordings according to a natural-language perspective while inferring both the number of clusters and their assignments. To study this setting, we construct AudioLens-Bench, a benchmark spanning multiple application domains and evaluating both in-perspective and cross-perspective generalization. We further propose AudioLens-R1, an end-to-end large audio-language model trained with reasoning distillation and preference optimization. Experiments show that AudioLens-R1 consistently outperforms all baselines, improving overall ARI by 12.99 points and V-measure by 11.62 points. These results demonstrate the promise of native audio-language models for flexible, perspective-conditioned structure discovery over speech collections.
Wenjun Huang, Qiao-Song Chu, Tiger Shao et al.· 0 citations