Language-queried audio source separation (LASS) aims to extract target sources from audio mixtures according to natural language descriptions, offering a flexible and scalable interface for audio source separation. However, most existing LASS methods rely on discriminative, mask-based models, which estimate masks from the input mixture. These methods often over-suppress target sounds or fail to fully separate them, especially when multiple sound events strongly overlap in complex acoustic scenes. In this work, we propose FlowSep2, a text-conditioned flow-matching generative model for LASS. Instead of directly predicting a separation mask, FlowSep2 learns to generate the target source representation from Gaussian noise in a latent space, conditioned on both the mixture representation and the text query. Specifically, we employ rectified flow matching with a Diffusion Transformer backbone. We further incorporate Self-Flow, a self-supervised flow-matching paradigm, into our LASS framework. By encouraging semantically structured latent representations under the generative objective, Self-Flow improves the model's ability to separate target sources according to text queries. Experiments on multiple LASS benchmarks show that FlowSep2 achieves state-of-the-art performance and demonstrates enhanced sound separation results in challenging scenarios with overlapping sound events.
Yiitan Yuan, Xubo Liu, Haohe Liu et al.· 0 citations
DCASE~2026 Task~5 introduces Audio-Dependent Question Answering (ADQA), which tests whether large audio-language models answer from the audio rather than from textual priors. An Audio-Dependency Filtering (ADF) pipeline combines silent-audio probing, per-option perplexity, a large language model (LLM) commonsense check, and human review to remove items solvable from text alone. The 3000 items that pass form the ADQA-Bench evaluation set, spanning music, speech, and environmental audio. The inaugural edition draws 14 teams and 36 submissions across two tracks defined by total parameter count (up to 100B and under 10B). A Chung-Ang University ensemble of MOSS-Audio-8B-Thinking and Qwen3-Omni-30B reaches the top overall accuracy at \pct{58.33}, and a MOSS-only configuration from the same team leads the sub-10B track at \pct{57.30}. Across the 30 submissions with a comparable development score, evaluation accuracy falls by 11.91 percentage points (pp) on average (median 10.91\,pp) on the hidden evaluation split, which is designed to be harder than the development split. The most common building blocks are: the MOSS-Audio-8B-Thinking backbone (13 of 36 submissions), Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning on AudioMCQ-StrongAC, and preference or reinforcement-learning objectives -- Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) in five teams, Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (GDPO) in two. At test time, prompt engineering is near-universal, and majority or choice-permutation voting is common. Every system misses the same set of 233 evaluation items.
Haolin He, Renhe Sun, Zheqi Dai et al.· 0 citations
