Skip to content

Author

Khai-Hoan Nguyen-Dang

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Preprint Jul 2026

Counterexamples of Friedlander--Iwaniec dual sums conjecture

Let $a(n)$ and $b(n)$ be arithmetic sequences, and $$A(s)=\sum_{n\ge1}a(n)n^{-s}, \qquad B(s)=\sum_{n\ge1}b(n)n^{-s},$$ be the two Dirichlet series related by a certain functional equation. Let $m$ be the \emph{analytic degree} of the functional equation. For $x>0$ and a positive integer $N$, Friedlander and Iwaniec (2005) define the sharply truncated nonlinear dual sum $$\mathcal B_{\ell,D}(x,N) := \sum_{\substack{n\in\mathbb N\\ n\le N}} b(n)n^{-\beta_m} \cos\left( 2\pi m\left(\frac{nx}{D}\right)^{1/m} +\frac{\pi\ell}{4} \right),$$ where $D\ge1$ is the conductor, $\beta_m:=\frac{m+1}{2m}$, and $\ell=m-3-2k$ is determined by the archimedean weight $k$ of the functional equation. Their Conjecture 1 predicts that, for every $\varepsilon>0$, $$\mathcal B_{\ell,D}(x,N) \ll_{\varepsilon,\boldsymbol\kappa} (DNx)^\varepsilon,$$ uniformly in the variables $x$ and $N$, with the degree, conductor, and archimedean datum fixed. We give counterexamples to this prediction with $$A(s)=B(s)=\zeta(s)^m,\; m\geq 4$$ where $$\zeta(s):=\sum_{n\ge1}n^{-s} \qquad(\operatorname{Re}s>1)$$ is the Riemann zeta function.

Khai-Hoan Nguyen-Dang · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Impossibility of a nontrivial Brunn--Minkowski inequality for higher Dirichlet eigenvalue

Let $\lambda_j(K)$ be the $j$th Dirichlet eigenvalue of a convex body $K$. It is well known that $\lambda_1$ satisfies a Brunn--Minkowski inequality: $K \mapsto \lambda_1(K)^{-1/2}$ is concave on the family of convex bodies. We show that no analogous statement holds for higher eigenvalues. More precisely, for any $j \geq 2$ and $N \geq 2$, if $K \mapsto (f \circ \lambda_j)(K)$ is concave on the family of convex bodies in $\mathbb{R}^N$ for some function $f: (0, \infty) \to \mathbb{R}$, then $f$ must be constant.

Tr'i Minh Le, Khai-Hoan Nguyen-Dang · 0 citations