44 papers indexed here
Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.
The rapid adoption of Generative AI (GenAI) in the software development life cycle (SDLC) increases computational demand, which can raise the carbon footprint of development activities. At the same time, organizations are increasingly embedding governance mechanisms into GenAI-assisted development to support trust, transparency, and accountability. However, these governance mechanisms introduce additional computational workloads, including repeated inference, regeneration cycles, and expanded validation pipelines, increasing energy use and the carbon footprint of GenAI-assisted development. This paper proposes Carbon-Aware Governance Gates (CAGG), an architectural extension that embeds carbon budgets, energy provenance, and sustainability-aware validation orchestration into human-AI governance layers. CAGG comprises three components: (i) an Energy and Carbon Provenance Ledger, (ii) a Carbon Budget Manager, and (iii) a Green Validation Orchestrator, operationalized through governance policies and reusable design patterns.
Abstract. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from industrial activities remain one of the greatest contributors to global climate change. Hollow fiber membranes (HFMs) have emerged as a promising technology for post-combustion CO2 separation owing to their high surface-area-to-volume ratio and scalability. This work focuses on the fabrication of HFMs with an emphasis on gas separation, particularly CO2, using the non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) spinning process for HFMs fabrication. The process allows specific control over dope and bore fluid selection, and flowrates, enabling the formation of asymmetric structures with desirable porosity, mechanical strength and suitable morphology for gas separation. The fabrication of polyethersulfone (PES)-based HFMs via NIPS, with 3 wt% polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a pore-forming additive, served as a foundational and basic study framework to provide an overview of the general hollow fibre membrane fabrication process. Preliminary assessments demonstrated the suitability of the fabricated membranes for gas separation applications as per requirements of membrane-based carbon capture technologies. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), gas permeability tests, and tensile testing all revealed improvements in morphology, porosity, and mechanical strength, implying that this method for fabricating hollow fibre membranes has significant potential for tuning hollow fibre membranes for gas separation applications. Finally, the potential of HFM-based systems for energy-efficient CO2 capture is highlighted to be explored further.
In this paper, we present a novel approach to improving software quality and efficiency through a Large Language Model (LLM)-based model designed to review code and identify potential issues. Our proposed LLM-based AI agent model is trained on large code repositories. This training includes code reviews, bug reports, and documentation of best practices. It aims to detect code smells, identify potential bugs, provide suggestions for improvement, and optimize the code. Unlike traditional static code analysis tools, our LLM-based AI agent has the ability to predict future potential risks in the code. This supports a dual goal of improving code quality and enhancing developer education by encouraging a deeper understanding of best practices and efficient coding techniques. Furthermore, we explore the model's effectiveness in suggesting improvements that significantly reduce post-release bugs and enhance code review processes, as evidenced by an analysis of developer sentiment toward LLM feedback. For future work, we aim to assess the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-generated documentation updates in comparison to manual methods. This will involve an empirical study focusing on manually conducted code reviews to identify code smells and bugs, alongside an evaluation of best practice documentation, augmented by insights from developer discussions and code reviews. Our goal is to not only refine the accuracy of our LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.
Large language models are redefining software engineering by implementing AI-powered techniques throughout the whole software development process, including requirement gathering, software architecture, code generation, testing, and deployment. However, it is still difficult to develop a cohesive platform that consistently produces the best outcomes across all stages. The objective of this study is to develop a unified platform that utilizes multiple artificial intelligence agents to automate the process of transforming user requirements into well-organized deliverables. These deliverables include user stories, prioritization, and UML sequence diagrams, along with the modular approach to APIs, unit tests, and end-to-end tests. Additionally, the platform will organize tasks, perform security and compliance, and suggest design patterns and improvements for non-functional requirements. We allow users to control and manage each phase according to their preferences. In addition, the platform provides security and compliance checks following European standards and proposes design optimizations. We use multiple models, such as GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama3 to enable to generation of modular code as per user choice. The research also highlights the limitations and future research discussions to overall improve the software development life cycle. The source code for our uniform platform is hosted on GitHub, enabling additional experimentation and supporting both research and practical uses. \end
Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely used in Software Engineering (SE) for various tasks, including generating code, designing and documenting software, adding code comments, reviewing code, and writing test scripts. However, creating test scripts or automating test cases demands test suite documentation that comprehensively covers functional requirements. Such documentation must enable thorough testing within a constrained scope and timeframe, particularly as requirements and user demands evolve. This article centers on generating user requirements as epics and high-level user stories and crafting test case scenarios based on these stories. It introduces a web-based software tool that employs an LLM-based agent and prompt engineering to automate the generation of test case scenarios against user requirements.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing Software Engineering (SE) by introducing innovative methods for tasks such as collecting requirements, designing software, generating code, and creating test cases, among others. This article focuses on requirements engineering, typically seen as the initial phase of software development that involves multiple system stakeholders. Despite its key role, the challenge of identifying requirements and satisfying all stakeholders within time and budget constraints remains significant. To address the challenges in requirements engineering, this study introduces a web-based software tool utilizing AI agents and prompt engineering to automate task prioritization and apply diverse prioritization techniques, aimed at enhancing project management within the agile framework. This approach seeks to transform the prioritization of agile requirements, tackling the substantial challenge of meeting stakeholder needs within set time and budget limits. Furthermore, the source code of our developed prototype is available on GitHub, allowing for further experimentation and prioritization of requirements, facilitating research and practical application.
Systematic literature review (SLR) is foundational to evidence-based research, enabling scholars to identify, classify, and synthesize existing studies to address specific research questions. Conducting an SLR is, however, largely a manual process. In recent years, researchers have made significant progress in automating portions of the SLR pipeline to reduce the effort and time required for high-quality reviews; nevertheless, there remains a lack of AI-agent-based systems that automate the entire SLR workflow. To this end, we introduce a novel multi-AI-agent system designed to fully automate SLRs. Leveraging large language models (LLMs), our system streamlines the review process to enhance efficiency and accuracy. Through a user-friendly interface, researchers specify a topic; the system then generates a search string to retrieve relevant academic papers. Next, an inclusion/exclusion filtering step is applied to titles relevant to the research area. The system subsequently summarizes paper abstracts and retains only those directly related to the field of study. In the final phase, it conducts a thorough analysis of the selected papers with respect to predefined research questions. This paper presents the system, describes its operational framework, and demonstrates how it substantially reduces the time and effort traditionally required for SLRs while maintaining comprehensiveness and precision. The code for this project is available at: https://github.com/GPT-Laboratory/SLR-automation .
Requirements Engineering (RE) plays a pivotal role in software development, encompassing tasks such as requirements elicitation, analysis, specification, and change management. Despite its critical importance, RE faces challenges including communication complexities, early-stage uncertainties, and accurate resource estimation. This study empirically investigates the effectiveness of utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate requirements analysis tasks. We implemented a multi-agent system that deploys AI models as agents to generate user stories from initial requirements, assess and improve their quality, and prioritize them using a selected technique. In our implementation, we deployed four models, namely GPT-3.5, GPT-4 Omni, LLaMA3-70, and Mixtral-8B, and conducted experiments to analyze requirements on four real-world projects. We evaluated the results by analyzing the semantic similarity and API performance of different models, as well as their effectiveness and efficiency in requirements analysis, gathering users' feedback on their experiences. Preliminary results indicate notable variations in task completion among the models. Mixtral-8B provided the quickest responses, while GPT-3.5 performed exceptionally well when processing complex user stories with a higher similarity score, demonstrating its capability in deriving accurate user stories from project descriptions. Feedback and suggestions from the four project members further corroborate the effectiveness of LLMs in improving and streamlining RE phases.
As Large Language Models (LLMs) have become integral to both research and daily operations, rigorous evaluation is crucial. This assessment is important not only for individual tasks but also for understanding their societal impact and potential risks. Despite extensive efforts to examine LLMs from various perspectives, there is a noticeable lack of multi-agent AI models specifically designed to evaluate the performance of different LLMs. To address this gap, we introduce a novel multi-agent AI model that aims to assess and compare the performance of various LLMs. Our model consists of eight distinct AI agents, each responsible for retrieving code based on a common description from different advanced language models, including GPT-3.5, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo, Google Bard, LLAMA, and Hugging Face. Our developed model utilizes the API of each language model to retrieve code for a given high-level description. Additionally, we developed a verification agent, tasked with the critical role of evaluating the code generated by its counterparts. We integrate the HumanEval benchmark into our verification agent to assess the generated code's performance, providing insights into their respective capabilities and efficiencies. Our initial results indicate that the GPT-3.5 Turbo model's performance is comparatively better than the other models. This preliminary analysis serves as a benchmark, comparing their performances side by side. Our future goal is to enhance the evaluation process by incorporating the Massively Multitask Benchmark for Python (MBPP) benchmark, which is expected to further refine our assessment. Additionally, we plan to share our developed model with twenty practitioners from various backgrounds to test our model and collect their feedback for further improvement.