The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.
Abstract
In this paper, we present a novel approach to improving software quality and efficiency through a Large Language Model (LLM)-based model designed to review code and identify potential issues. Our proposed LLM-based AI agent model is trained on large code repositories. This training includes code reviews, bug reports, and documentation of best practices. It aims to detect code smells, identify potential bugs, provide suggestions for improvement, and optimize the code. Unlike traditional static code analysis tools, our LLM-based AI agent has the ability to predict future potential risks in the code. This supports a dual goal of improving code quality and enhancing developer education by encouraging a deeper understanding of best practices and efficient coding techniques. Furthermore, we explore the model's effectiveness in suggesting improvements that significantly reduce post-release bugs and enhance code review processes, as evidenced by an analysis of developer sentiment toward LLM feedback. For future work, we aim to assess the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-generated documentation updates in comparison to manual methods. This will involve an empirical study focusing on manually conducted code reviews to identify code smells and bugs, alongside an evaluation of best practice documentation, augmented by insights from developer discussions and code reviews. Our goal is to not only refine the accuracy of our LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.
GenAI can function as a research tool, but not as a substitute for methodological expertise, and has potential to increase efficiency of tasks which take advantage of its search and summarization abilities, as well as basic code debugging and algorithm formation.
Natalie Morosin, A. A. Nadi, Michael P. Wallace· 0 citations
It is observed that generated code often omits basic input validation or memory-safety checks, which can lead to overflows, resource exhaustion, or other reliability/security issues, and even the largest models frequently make simple mistakes.
Rodrigo Pato Nogueira, Marco Vieira, João R. Campos· 0 citations
ARCTIC, an AI-powered Code Critique system that reframes code review around three capabilities: intent prediction, which infers why a change was made from conversation logs and metadata; drift detection, which measures divergence between the developer's intent and the agent's output via backtranslation; and code spotli...
C. Maddila, Mashrur Rashik, E. Khan et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This survey synthesises research from 2020 to 2026 on AI-driven techniques for code review and software quality evaluation, focusing on two complementary paradigms: Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) and Large Language Models (LLMs).
R. Borgalli, Uma Raj, Shwetha Shetty· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Recently, Developers have been relying on AI tools to support them in their daily work by generating code. While the use of large language model-based AI tools has improved productivity, the quality of the generated code wasn't always optimal. In a lot of cases, the code includes design issues known as code smells, whi...
Y. Younes, Yousef Elsheikh· IEEE Jordan Conference on Ap...· 0 citations
Current research is summarized to identify key gaps and future directions to optimize LLM based APR are proposed, to assure its reliability and scalability in real world software development.
Fatmaelzahra Hamdi, Ramadam Moawad, A. Mohsen· Journal of universal compute...· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 15, 2026
A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.
Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity. The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduJun 3, 2026
The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.