Skip to content

Author

Robert L. Findling

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Data diversity vs. model complexity in the prediction of pediatric bipolar disorder: Evidence from academic and community clinical samples.

Pediatric bipolar disorder is challenging to diagnose accurately due to symptom heterogeneity. More standardized and data-driven approaches are needed to enhance diagnostic reliability. We evaluated a clinical decision tool (nomogram), statistical methods (logistic regression, LASSO), machine learning (support vector machine, random forest, k-nearest neighbors, extreme gradient boosting), and deep learning (multilayer perceptron) for pediatric bipolar disorder prediction across two datasets collected in academic (N = 550) and community (N = 511) clinical settings. We compared three modeling strategies: cross-dataset validation, cross-dataset with interaction terms, and pooled-dataset. We assessed model performance using discrimination, calibration, and predictor importance ranking. In the baseline cross-dataset approach, all models showed good internal discrimination in the academic dataset, but external discrimination in the community dataset substantially declined. Interaction-enhanced models slightly improved internal discrimination but not external performance or calibration. Recalibration substantially improved cross-dataset calibration. Models trained on the pooled sample showed strong performance on held-out samples drawn from the heterogeneous pooled cohort, with good calibration for most models. Across models and training strategies, PGBI-10M was consistently identified as the most important predictor. Predictive models for pediatric bipolar disorder showed strong internal performance but limited cross-setting generalizability due to dataset shift and miscalibration. Within the present study, increasing model complexity did not improve external performance, whereas training on pooled data improved performance on held-out samples from the heterogeneous pooled cohort. These findings suggest that training-data diversity may provide greater practical benefit than increasing model complexity for developing robust psychiatric prediction models, underscoring the importance of open and collaborative datasets.

Zhuoyu Shi, Eric A. Youngstrom, Yinuo Liu et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Symptoms of cognitive disengagement syndrome in youth diagnosed with ADHD, mood disorders, and comorbid presentations.

Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (CDS) is characterized by symptoms such as daydreaming, slowed behavior, and mental confusion, but remains understudied outside of ADHD populations. CDS has recently emerged as a potential transdiagnostic construct, yet most investigations have been limited to ADHD samples. To further clarify the clinical profile of CDS, research is needed in pediatric mood disorder populations and comorbid presentations. This study examined predictors of caregiver-reported CDS symptoms in a racially and socioeconomically diverse sample of treatment-seeking outpatient youth (N = 697), with attention to psychiatric diagnoses (ADHD and mood disorders), youth demographics, caregiver education, and number of other psychiatric diagnoses. A 5-item CBCL-based CDS index demonstrated acceptable psychometric performance and was used to capture youth CDS levels. Hierarchical regression revealed that mood disorder diagnosis was the strongest and most unique predictor of elevated CDS symptoms, followed by ADHD diagnosis, with the comorbid group (ADHD+Mood) showing the highest CDS levels. Clinical and structural factors, including mood and ADHD diagnoses, number of other psychiatric diagnoses, Black racial identity, lower caregiver education, and older age, each independently predicted CDS severity. These findings support CDS as a clinically meaningful construct extending beyond ADHD and underscore the importance of contextually informed, transdiagnostic assessment. Implications are discussed through a developmental psychopathology framework, emphasizing equifinality.

E. Choplin, Casey D. Calhoun, J. Youngstrom et al. · 0 citations