Skip to content
Open access

Data diversity vs. model complexity in the prediction of pediatric bipolar disorder: Evidence from academic and community clinical samples.

Aug 2026 · Journal of Affective Disorders · Vol 414, pp. 122378 · 0 citations · 61 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Predictive models for pediatric bipolar disorder showed strong internal performance but limited cross-setting generalizability due to dataset shift and miscalibration, and training on pooled data improved performance on held-out samples from the heterogeneous pooled cohort.

Abstract

Pediatric bipolar disorder is challenging to diagnose accurately due to symptom heterogeneity. More standardized and data-driven approaches are needed to enhance diagnostic reliability. We evaluated a clinical decision tool (nomogram), statistical methods (logistic regression, LASSO), machine learning (support vector machine, random forest, k-nearest neighbors, extreme gradient boosting), and deep learning (multilayer perceptron) for pediatric bipolar disorder prediction across two datasets collected in academic (N = 550) and community (N = 511) clinical settings. We compared three modeling strategies: cross-dataset validation, cross-dataset with interaction terms, and pooled-dataset. We assessed model performance using discrimination, calibration, and predictor importance ranking. In the baseline cross-dataset approach, all models showed good internal discrimination in the academic dataset, but external discrimination in the community dataset substantially declined. Interaction-enhanced models slightly improved internal discrimination but not external performance or calibration. Recalibration substantially improved cross-dataset calibration. Models trained on the pooled sample showed strong performance on held-out samples drawn from the heterogeneous pooled cohort, with good calibration for most models. Across models and training strategies, PGBI-10M was consistently identified as the most important predictor. Predictive models for pediatric bipolar disorder showed strong internal performance but limited cross-setting generalizability due to dataset shift and miscalibration. Within the present study, increasing model complexity did not improve external performance, whereas training on pooled data improved performance on held-out samples from the heterogeneous pooled cohort. These findings suggest that training-data diversity may provide greater practical benefit than increasing model complexity for developing robust psychiatric prediction models, underscoring the importance of open and collaborative datasets.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access 2026

A Hybrid Ensemble Framework for Reliable and Interpretable Parkinson’s Disease Prediction Using Clinical Tabular Data

Parkinson’s disease (PD) prediction in clinical tabular data is challenging due to feature interactions and data imbalance. The current methods put emphasis on either predictive performance or interpretability in a unified way. This paper presents a comparative hybrid learning framework that evaluates conventional mach...

Ghadah Naif Alwakid, N. Tariq, Mamoona Humayun et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Machine-Learning Assessment of the Predictive Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Cognitive Impairment in an Older Hispanic Adult Cohort

The fitted model is an inspectable table of thresholds and class-conditional probabilities, which identifies I-309/CCL1 as an interpretable candidate feature for tabular prediction of cognitive impairment, pending external validation.

Antony García, Gabrielle B. Britton, Alcibiades E. Villarreal et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Predicting six-year depression trajectories in adulthood: A super learner ensemble approach using the Add Health dataset.

BACKGROUND Depression is a leading global cause of disability, and much focus has been directed toward identifying population-wide predictors of adult depression. The present study aimed to identify the strongest predictors of future depression severity using a comprehensive panel of biopsychosocial predictors and the...

Jordan W J Chng, Kean J. Hsu, Nur Hani Hani Zainal · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting ADHD comorbidity in children with allergic rhinitis: a SHAP-based analysis

The co-occurrence of allergic rhinitis (AR) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) presents significant clinical challenges in pediatrics, yet predictive tools capturing non-linear neuro-immune interactions are lacking. We developed an interpretable Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model util...

He-Xiu Yuan, Neng-Jing Wu · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Machine Learning-Based Obesity Prediction and Feature Importance Analysis Using Random Forest

Obesity prevalence continues to rise both globally and in Indonesia, yet most predictive studies rely on datasets from Western populations or clinical settings, leaving a gap in machine-learning-based evidence from Southeast Asian university communities. This study applies Random Forest to survey data from 300 responde...

Anjelina Dwi Puspita, Nelly Astuti Hasibuan, Kevin Boy Sinaga et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Explainable random forest–SHAP framework for Montreal phenotype–stratified prediction of one-year complications in Crohn’s disease

Background Early identification of phenotype-stratified, short-term complication risk remains a critical unmet need in Crohn’s disease (CD). Existing models focus on single outcomes and lack interpretability, limiting clinical use. We developed a clinically interpretable machine-learning framework to enable Montreal ph...

Kun Xia, Ying Shi, Xiao-Han Huang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.