Skip to content

Author

Sarfaraz K. Niazi

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

Physical feasibility gating in early drug discovery: a decision framework for identifying predictable physical failures, with retrospective illustration

Clinical drug development is characterized by high attrition rates: approximately 90% of candidates entering Phase I fail to obtain approval. Inadequate efficacy accounts for 40 to 50 percent of terminations in Phase II and Phase III, while safety concerns account for roughly 30 percent. Most efficacy failures result from incorrect biological hypotheses rather than physicochemical deficiencies: drugs frequently bind their intended targets but fail to alter disease progression because the mechanistic assumptions underlying their action are invalid. This perspective introduces a feasibility-gating framework that utilizes physical constraints as explicit, early-stage filters. The framework does not claim that physics alone can predict therapeutic success; rather, it asserts that a systematic evaluation of thermodynamic, kinetic, transport, and microenvironmental constraints can identify candidates likely to fail on physical grounds prior to substantial investment in synthesis and translational research, thereby conserving resources for the inherently experimental validation of biological hypotheses. The individual constraints are based on well-established pharmacological principles; their contribution lies in organizing these principles into a checklist-style decision logic with specific thresholds, explicit guidance on interpreting each threshold, and a clear connection to quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. We position this framework relative to these established quantitative disciplines, implement each gating criterion, and demonstrate the logic retrospectively using documented development histories. Physical reasoning serves as an essential yet limited filter: it identifies certain predictable physical risks early in the development process without guaranteeing success for candidates that pass through.

Sarfaraz K. Niazi · 0 citations
#protein folding Open access Aug 2026

Dynamic Protein Structure Paradox: An Integrative Framework for Endpoint-Conditioned Evidentiary Sufficiency in Structure-to-Function Claims

The Dynamic Protein Structure Paradox is defined as the apparent conflict between structural accuracy and functional underdetermination and DPSP is developed as an integrative evidentiary assessment framework rather than a new theory or paradigm.

Sarfaraz K. Niazi · 0 citations