We present a large language models (LLMs) based multi-agent system to automate the refactoring of Haskell codebases. The multi-agent system consists of specialized agents performing tasks such as context analysis, refactoring, validation, and testing. Refactoring improvements are using metrics such as cyclomatic complexity, run-time, and memory allocation. Experimental evaluations conducted on Haskell codebases demonstrate improvements in code quality. Cyclomatic complexity was reduced by 13.64% and 47.06% in the respective codebases. Memory allocation improved by 4.17% and 41.73%, while runtime efficiency increased by up to 50%. These metrics highlight the systems ability to optimize Haskells functional paradigms while maintaining correctness and scalability. Results show reductions in complexity and performance enhancements across codebases. The integration of LLMs based multi-agent system enables precise task execution and inter-agent collaboration, addressing the challenges of refactoring in functional programming. This approach aims to address the challenges of refactoring functional programming languages through distributed and modular systems.
Shahbaz Siddeeq, Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
The use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for autonomous code generation is gaining attention in emerging technologies. As LLM capabilities expand, they offer new possibilities such as code refactoring, security enhancements, and legacy application upgrades. Many outdated web applications pose security and reliability challenges, yet companies continue using them due to the complexity and cost of upgrades. To address this, we propose an LLM-based multi-agent system that autonomously upgrades legacy web applications to the latest versions. The system distributes tasks across multiple phases, updating all relevant files. To evaluate its effectiveness, we employed Zero-Shot Learning (ZSL) and One-Shot Learning (OSL) prompts, applying identical instructions in both cases. The evaluation involved updating view files and measuring the number and types of errors in the output. For complex tasks, we counted the successfully met requirements. The experiments compared the proposed system with standalone LLM execution, repeated multiple times to account for stochastic behavior. Results indicate that our system maintains context across tasks and agents, improving solution quality over the base model in some cases. This study provides a foundation for future model implementations in legacy code updates. Additionally, findings highlight LLMs' ability to update small outdated files with high precision, even with basic prompts. The source code is publicly available on GitHub: https://github.com/alasalm1/Multi-agent-pipeline.
Valtteri Ala-Salmi, Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami et al.· International Conference on...· 4 citations
Vibe coding is a software development practice in which developers state intent in natural language and large language models generate code. It is often framed as one-shot prompting, but the evidence describes an intent-driven, iterative workflow whose outcomes depend on how generated code is evaluated and governed. Knowledge of how vibe coding is defined, practiced, and governed is scattered across academic and practitioner sources, and, to our knowledge, existing reviews have not yet integrated both evidence streams. We conducted a multivocal literature review of peer-reviewed and grey literature following established guidelines. Searches spanned 2022 to October 2025. After screening, credibility assessment, and snowballing, 47 sources were retained (28 peer-reviewed and 19 grey) and analyzed through descriptive mapping and thematic synthesis across eight research questions. Vibe coding is consistently described as an iterative generation-evaluation-revision loop rather than a one-shot activity, and developer work shifts from writing code towards specification, supervision, and validation. Short-term productivity and time-to-prototype gains are reported in 21 of 47 sources (45%), while evidence on maintainability, long-term quality, and safeguard effectiveness remains limited. Evidence is strongest for prototyping and user-interface work and weakest for production, data-intensive, and safety-critical use, and tool visibility does not imply effectiveness. This is one of the first reviews to integrate peer-reviewed and grey literature on vibe coding under a single documented protocol. Future work should evaluate safeguard effectiveness, study session-level dynamics and long-term maintainability, and test vibe coding in production, data-intensive, and safety-critical settings.
Shahbaz Siddeeq, Muhammad Waseem, Kai-Kristian Kemell et al.· 0 citations
Automated authoring of Gherkin Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) acceptance criteria remains a manual bottleneck in requirements engineering. This study investigates whether epic-organized LLM-generated Gherkin produces higher quality and coverage than requirement-aligned generation. We compare our Timeless (an epic-organized LLM pipeline) approach against a naive large language model (LLM) baseline on four requirements documents (107 requirements) from the PURE dataset. Evaluation covers structural metrics, automated requirement coverage via TF-IDF and dense embeddings, and blind expert assessment by four researchers. In our evaluation, the JSON-constrained pipeline produced structurally valid scenarios across all generated outputs, while the zero-shot baseline achieved 99% structural validity. Semantic coverage was comparable to the baseline, with Timeless achieving 94.3% semantic Requirement Coverage Rate compared with 92.9% for the baseline. TF-IDF produced lower coverage scores for the epic-organized output, suggesting that lexical metrics may miss coverage when scenarios paraphrase requirements at a higher level of abstraction. Expert raters prefer the epic-organized strategy on Correctness (4.61 vs 4.14), Executability (4.61 vs 4.07), and Completeness (4.31 vs 3.50). Overall, the results suggest that epic-organized generation can improve perceived Gherkin quality while maintaining comparable semantic coverage, although broader replication is needed before generalizing this finding.
Shahbaz Siddeeq, M. Abbasi, Jussi Rasku et al.· 0 citations
Refactoring is a constant activity in software development and maintenance. Scale and maintain software systems are based on code refactoring. However, this process is still labor intensive, as it requires programmers to analyze the codebases in detail to avoid introducing new defects. In this research, we put forward a large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent system to automate the refactoring process on Haskell code. The objective of this research is to evaluate the effect of LLM-based agents in performing structured and semantically accurate refactoring on Haskell code. Our proposed multi-agent system based on specialized agents with distinct roles, including code analysis, refactoring execution, verification, and debugging. To test the effectiveness and practical applicability of the multi-agent system, we conducted evaluations using different open-source Haskell codebases. The results of the experiments carried out showed that the proposed LLM-based multi-agent system could average 11.03% decreased complexity in code, an improvement of 22.46% in overall code quality, and increase performance efficiency by an average of 13.27%. Furthermore, memory allocation was optimized by up to 14.57%. These results highlight the ability of LLM-based multi-agent in managing refactoring tasks targeted toward functional programming paradigms. Our findings hint that LLM-based multi-agent systems integration into the refactoring of functional programming languages can enhance maintainability and support automated development workflows.
Shahbaz Siddeeq, Muhammad Waseem, Z. Rasheed et al.· International Conference on...· 4 citations
These findings show that reliable evaluation of LLM-generated code requires validated ground truth, protected tests, and multiple explicitly interpreted measures, and that CodeAssay provides a reproducible basis for evidence-based model evaluation in AI-augmented software development.
Shahbaz Siddeeq, Muhammad Waseem, Umar Subhan Malhi et al.· 0 citations