Skip to content

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

#computer vision Oct 2025

Allosteric Cooperativity Mechanism Investigation of Orthosteric and Allosteric Ligands in Modulating AR Activity: A Molecular Dynamics Study

The androgen receptor (AR) represents a pivotal therapeutic target for prostate cancer. However, existing orthosteric ligand-binding pocket (LBP) antagonists [e.g., enzalutamide (ENZ)] encounter significant obstacles due to resistance-conferring mutations in the LBP. Allosteric antagonists targeting the BF3 site exhibit great potential in overcoming such resistance but have low inhibitory efficacy. In our study, we employed an integrated computational modeling strategy, including Gaussian-accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD), MM/GBSA free-energy calculations, and elastic network model (ENM)-based signaling communication pathway analyses. This approach is used to probe the cooperativity of allosteric BF3 antagonists [e.g., VPC-13808 (VPC)] with diverse orthosteric LBP ligands [e.g., ENZ and testosterone (TES)] in suppressing AR activity. Herein, four types of AR systems were examined: AR bound to LBP agonist (AR·TES), LBP antagonists (e.g., AR·ENZ), and combinations of LBP agonist/antagonist with BF3 antagonist (e.g., AR·TES·VPC and AR·ENZ·VPC). Results indicate that BF3 antagonists can synergize with the LBP antagonist to amplify conformational flexibility in H12 and induce anticorrelated dynamics of H12 with H3 and H4. This induces the downward movement of H12 and its displacement away from H3/H4, triggering the wide opening of the AF2 binding cleft and substantially reducing the coactivator recruitment. Furthermore, the BF3 antagonist can interact with specific residues (e.g., F673, F826, L830, and Y834) and cooperate with the LBP agonist or antagonist to allosterically perturb the AF2 conformation. Multiple short- and/or long-range BF3→AF2 and LBP→AF2 signaling transition pathways are involved, such as F673→Y834→L722→L812→L744→V746→L873→ENZ→L880/V889/V891. These mechanistic insights establish the foundation for developing novel AR BF3 antagonist and LBP-BF3 combination therapies, suggesting a promising avenue for enhancing the efficacy and overcoming the resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment.

Xiaotian Kong, Yushan Zou, Peng Cao et al. · 1 citation
Open access Jul 2026

A Robust Framework for Maize Elite Line Genome Editing Through Enhanced HI‐Edit via LbCas12a Activity Optimization

ABSTRACT Haploid induction coupled with genome editing (HI‐Edit) enables direct modification of commercial crop varieties, bypassing the need for trait introgression or direct transformation of elite lines with CRISPR machinery. However, its widespread application has been constrained by low haploid editing rates (HER), the proportion of haploids carrying edits within the short window between double fertilization and uniparental chromosome elimination. Here, we report substantial improvements in maize HI‐Edit efficiency through three complementary strategies: (1) driving an optimized LbCas12a variant (LbCas12aV) using promoters that are highly active in sperm cells and early zygotes; (2) applying a post‐pollination heat treatment; and (3) fusing LbCas12aV with the UBA2 domain (ubiquitin‐associated domain‐2 of Arabidopsis thaliana RAD23) to enhance protein stability during haploid induction. Post‐pollination heat treatment alone increased HER to 19.1% (up to 12‐fold improvement depending on the target site), providing a simple and effective method to boost the yield of edited doubled haploid (DH) plants. UBA2 fusion improved HER by 6‐fold at the Waxy1 (Wx1) locus and 4.5‐fold at the Glossy2 (Gl2) locus under normal conditions. Strikingly, combining UBA2 fusion with heat treatment raised the average HER to 25% across multiple events targeting Wx1, with the highest HER reaching 33%. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that increasing CRISPR‐Cas protein abundance and modulating environmental conditions can overcome key bottlenecks in HI‐Edit. We establish a robust, scalable framework that is readily transferable to other crops for elite‐line genome editing.

Dawei Liang, Huanhuan Guo, Juan Wei et al. · 0 citations