Graph pooling aims to compress the graph, including both node embeddings and their underlying topological patterns, into a more compact representation. Previous works focus primarily on the overly fine-grained representation of nodes, progressively coarsening the graph by removing nodes or merging them into clusters, thus neglecting the global-to-local patterns and adaptive granularity of the graph's topological structure. In the real scenario, graphs as a whole can be considered the coarsest level of granularity, encapsulating the global topological structure, with progressively finer-grained local topological structures represented from top to bottom. This process continues until the adaptive granularity for each subdomain is reached. To this end, we propose a novel Topology-Preserving Adaptive Graph Pooling (TPAGP) method that dynamically partitions graphs into granular balls by integrating node features and topological information, enabling the generation of multi-granularity representations that effectively capture both local and global structural patterns. Additionally, we design a multi-granularity graph network model that facilitates feature interaction and optimization across different granularities, significantly enhancing performance in graph classification tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that TPAGP outperforms existing pooling methods across various benchmark datasets, effectively mitigating information loss caused by fixed-granularity strategies.
Sen Zhao, Gaojie Xu, Shuyin Xia et al.· 0 citations
What is the relation between understanding and compression, and why does human understanding take such a heavily compressed form? Across information theory, machine learning, and AI research, a substantial tradition identifies understanding with compression-a thought captured in Gregory Chaitin's dictum that "comprehension is compression." Philosophers, by contrast, have characterized understanding in terms of grasping connections, giving explanations, and handling novelty. This paper bridges the two pictures through three interlocking theses. The first concerns the concept of understanding: it serves as an efficient proxy for a distinctive form of robust competence, enabling us to identify whom to trust and whom to learn from. The second concerns the state of understanding: to understand a domain is to possess a mental model of its relational structure that enables prediction, and what enables prediction enables compression, because what becomes predictable need not be stored separately. Compression is therefore not identical with comprehension, but its representational shadow. The third concerns the characteristically human form of understanding: the fiduciary and transmission functions highlighted by the first thesis impose pressures of demonstrability and transmissibility that drive human understanding toward principled simplicity. The resulting framework explains both the appeal and the limits of compressionist accounts of understanding while shedding light on the inscrutability of AI systems.
The widespread adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) within real-world applications has raised a lot of concerns regarding their trustworthiness, especially in critical applications. The field of eXplainable AI (XAI) has emerged with the objective of providing explanations to the users about the decisions made by AI systems. Several explanations for boolean classifiers have been introduced in the literature, including abductive and contrastive explanations, each giving a different insight on the decision of the classifier. However, computing an explanation for a decision of a boolean classifier is a hard problem in general. One way to deal with this complexity is to rely on a compiled representation of the classifier for which each explanation can be computed efficiently. Unfortunately, we prove in this paper that several classes of abductive explanations, remain hard to compute even for Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams, one of the most tractable subsets of the knowledge compilation map. Included in such classes are shorter abductive explanations or abductive explanations that include the explainee's preferences. To recover the benefits of working with compiled representations, we show that a proper representation of the dual-rail encoding of the classifier can be used to compute efficiently these classes of explanations.
Arthur Ledaguenel, Florent Capelli, Jean-Marie Lagniez· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) now supports investment workflows from data and prediction through research, portfolios, execution, and tool use. Technical capability, however, is not evidence of investment profitability. This critical state-of-the-art review examines public research available through 31 August 2026 on listed equities, exchange-traded funds, centralized crypto spot, perpetual futures, and on-chain markets. We organize evidence with an alpha-translation chain: point-in-time information must yield a stable signal, feasible positions, executable orders, and risk-adjusted returns after costs. Across machine learning, time-series foundation models, financial language models, reinforcement learning, and agents, the examined record shows real but mainly upstream progress in prediction, text processing, portfolio design, and workflow integration. Evidence is thinner for durable net performance. Temporal contamination, repeated selection, survivorship, weak benchmarks, implementation costs, venue mechanics, and capacity can break translation to net alpha. Strong historical results coexist with predictor decay, corrected look-ahead failures, mixed prospective evidence, and few audited live-capital records. Crypto adds informative state but requires separate treatment of spot, perpetual, and decentralized cash flows and execution. Within the public evidence examined here, no general AI architecture is shown to deliver persistent, cross-regime, capacity-aware net alpha. More credible claims require point-in-time data and models, decision-aligned objectives, joint portfolio--execution evaluation, controlled adaptation, prospective tests, and authority-matched governance. These conditions can improve evidence and implementation; they do not guarantee profit.
Linsen Zhu, Mengqing Cai· 0 citations
Reach audiences
Advertise in front of researchers, engineers, and readers.
Many long-horizon LLM deployments face tight prompt budgets: latency, cost, and context limits make full-context prompting impractical as interaction length grows. The key question is then not raw recall alone, but which memory design gives the best quality--token trade-off in the compact-memory regime. We present \textbf{RSM-full}, an online clustered-memory pipeline designed for a strong quality--token Pareto point.
RSM-full combines two design choices: a cosine-gated \emph{max-member merge} write rule and an atom-aware grouped context packer. On AMA-Bench, our primary compact-memory benchmark, it reaches $83%$ of Full-Context quality at $32%$ of the token cost at a $4$k budget; under four-seed averaging it beats the closest streaming-clustered baseline (Online K-Means) by $+3.5$--$6.0$,pp ($p{<}.001$) across the whole ${\sim}2.6$k--${\sim}5$k regime. Three-seed ablations show most of this gain comes from the merge rule ($+5.7$,pp over Online K-Means and matched-$\tau$ DP-means) and the grouped packer ($+5.0$,pp over flat concatenation).
The pattern reproduces on RealMem, an independent long-horizon persona-memory benchmark: RSM-full improves on Budget-RAG ($+0.69$,pp, $p{=}.006$), is on par with BM25-RAG (paired $\Delta{=}{+}0.27$,pp, $p{=}.47$; we do \emph{not} claim BM25 equivalence in the equivalence-test sense), and significantly outperforms Streaming-Proto ($+2.97$,pp) and the closest reproduced 2025 agentic-memory baseline A-MEM ($+1.65$,pp, $p{<}.001$). Across benchmarks the message is consistent: under tight budgets, compact-memory performance is driven mainly by how streaming memories are merged and how retrieved content is assembled.
Overall, RSM-full is most useful when answeroughly $2k$--$5k$ prompt tokens, where itdefines a strong compact-memory Pareto point; higher-token baselines remain stronger outside this regime.
Large language models become consequential agents when surrounding systems let outputs change external state. Models now call tools, operate interfaces, delegate work, retain state, inhabit generated worlds, and control robots or laboratory equipment. Such advances are often narrated as one march toward autonomy, conflating model competence, system integration, persistence, and safe authority. This critical review synthesizes primary research and official technical specifications available by 31 August 2026. We organize the evidence along delegated authority, temporal persistence, and environmental coupling, while separating model, harness, and environment. Within the evidence examined, action-interface expansion is documented more convincingly than robust completion, recovery, authorization, or independent verification. Model Context Protocol and Agent2Agent improve interoperability but do not establish trustworthy delegation; multi-agent organization adds specialization alongside cost and correlated failure. Persistent simulations and world models support training and planning but do not themselves demonstrate agency; robotics and self-driving laboratories establish bounded feasibility rather than unattended open-world reliability. We propose justified delegation as an analytical and normative heuristic, not an observed law or certified score: expand action scope only where evidence supports provenance, bounded authority, failure detection, safe recovery, and calibrated human control. This framing yields a research agenda for coupled model-harness evaluation, capability-based permissions, durable state, cross-agent accountability, and staged physical validation.
Designing effective and fiscally sustainable policies for solar photovoltaic (PV) adoption requires balancing adoption gains against public expenditure under uncertainty and heterogeneous decision-making. This study formulates PV policy design as a sequential decision problem and integrates reinforcement learning (RL) with a stochastic agent-based model (ABM) that simulates yearly solar PV adoption under uncertainty. A policymaker agent selects annual incentives, including capital grants, subsidised loan rates, and feed-in tariffs, over a 16-year horizon. Adoption--cost trade-offs are explored by varying policy preferences within a scalarised reward framework. Policies are learned using PPO, SAC, and TD3 and evaluated under stochastic simulation. The results show that this approach produces a clear trade-off structure: the highest-adoption policy (TD3, $w_{\text{cost}}=0.5$) achieves approximately 4,145 adopters at a cost of EUR 41.73 million, while the lowest-cost policy (PPO, $w_{\text{cost}}=2.0$) reduces expenditure to EUR 7.27 million with 2,682 adopters. The balanced policy (PPO, $w_{\text{cost}}=1.6$) achieves 3,495 adopters at a cost of EUR 22.47 million. Across algorithms, consistent trade-off patterns are observed, indicating robustness of the adoption--cost relationship. Compared with static baseline policies, the RL framework explores a broader range of policy configurations. These findings demonstrate the potential of RL as a flexible tool for adaptive policy design under uncertainty.
Iias Faiud, Jonaid Shianifar, Michael Schukat et al.· 0 citations
The EU AI Act positions regulation as part of the infrastructure for safe, trustworthy and market-ready innovation. Realising this ambition requires regulatory learning: the evidence generated during implementation must be translated into governance and legal knowledge that supports consistent interpretation, effective oversight, and adaptation as technologies evolve. Yet the actors who produce this evidence and those who rely on it operate in different professional worlds. This paper proposes MARLA (Map, Assess, Report, Learn, Adapt), a conceptual scaffold organising regulatory learning as a five-stage cycle centred on the implementation of legal requirements into socio-technical practices, situated at the Local, National and European levels of the AI Act's governance architecture. Deliberately non-prescriptive, MARLA gives technical and legal stakeholders a shared vocabulary in which each of the first three stages generates its own documentable form of regulatory learning. We illustrate the scaffold with two piloted case studies and a prospective National-to-European illustration.
Alessio Buscemi, Tom Deckenbrunnen, Imane Hmiddou et al.· 0 citations
Improving an industrial recommender is an iterative research-and-engineering process rather than a direct path from idea to deployment. In \textbf{DASHEN, NetEase's gaming-community app}, algorithm engineers typically identify promising directions from research papers, technical reports, and prior production experiments; reproduce or adapt the underlying methods; implement them in the production codebase; and evaluate the resulting models through training and offline experiments. Promising candidates are then advanced to online A/B tests, and those demonstrating robust gains are submitted to Launch Review---the internal gate for full-traffic rollout. Large language models (LLMs) can assist with individual stages of this workflow, but the overall process remains human-dependent without a harness that can reliably coordinate them across long-running, often multi-day experimental cycles. We present \textbf{AutoLR}, initially built as \textbf{Auto Launch Review} and later extended upstream into an autonomous research-to-launch harness. AutoLR combines three system mechanisms: a \textbf{multi-expert council} that debates and adversarially reviews proposals; a \textbf{deterministic evidence-weighted exploration--exploitation selector} that allocates a limited trial budget across candidate directions and uses Council reranking; and a layered knowledge system that combines external research, production-system knowledge, and DASHEN-specific domain knowledge---such as game communities, player characteristics, and content-interaction patterns---with posterior evidence from configurations, patches, logs, failures, and offline outcomes. LLM agents perform semantic reasoning and code generation, while deterministic controllers retain authority over execution, metric extraction, guardrails, and persistent state transitions.
Multiplayer Online Battle Arena (MOBA) games rely on matchmaking to maintain competitive balance. Our prior work, CUPID, framed matchmaking as an assignment re-optimization problem and showed that a single-mode win-rate predictor can meaningfully rebalance teams. However, deploying such a system across diverse player populations exposes three practical bottlenecks: most queueing players lack sufficient in-mode match history (cold start), skill distributions shift drastically across rank tiers (distribution inconsistency), and extreme skill segments are severely data-starved.
We present CHAMP, a cross-domain matchmaking framework that resolves these deployment bottlenecks. To address data sparsity and cold starts, CHAMP replaces the target-mode-only player profile with a hybrid domain feature collection: a timestamp-ordered cross-mode short-term sequence whose slices are annotated with target-domain features, plus per-mode breakdowns of long-term, real-time and team statistics. We further propose the Domain-Aware Win-rate Network (DAWN): a Domain-aware Knowledge Extractor (DAKE) compiles target-mode attributes into learnable representations that feed Domain-Aware Temporal/Spatial/Permutation OmniNet Encoders (DATOE/DASOE/DAPOE), so that mode-conditioned representations and per-mode debiasing are learned jointly inside a single shared network. Online, one trained DAWN serves every supported mode, with per-mode position-satisfaction thresholds as the only mode-specific knob.
Offline, DAWN achieves 67.73% win-rate prediction accuracy, outperforming all evaluated attention and sequence baselines. Online A/B tests across the entire League ladder of a large-scale MOBA game, from novice players up to the top-expert players served by Elite Mode, demonstrate consistent drops in imbalanced matches. For lower-tier players, CHAMP reduces the 5-minute kill crushing rate by up to 20.73%.
Kai Wang, Ge Fan, Chaoyun Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Computer-use agents can execute increasingly complex tasks in graphical interfaces, but their interaction experience is typically transient: procedural knowledge acquired from one rollout is not systematically retained, refined, and reused in later tasks. Existing skill libraries provide external procedural knowledge, yet their incremental value over the same agent operating without skills, as well as their longitudinal dynamics under repeated interaction, remain insufficiently characterized. We present an online skill-evolution framework that converts interaction trajectories and evaluator feedback into a persistent, versioned library of reusable procedures. Each iteration executes against a frozen library snapshot, and evidence-guided skill updates become available in subsequent iterations without changing model parameters. We compare the full evolving-library system with a configuration-matched empty-library control across four OSWorld application domains under the same fixed action-generation and GUI-grounding stack, task sets, and iteration horizons. Following a five-iteration empty-library warm-up, Full attains a higher post-warm-up mean evaluator score in all four observed domain runs, with mean differences ranging from 5.7 to 18.6 percentage points and domain-dependent temporal stability. In GIMP, provenance-aware analysis reveals retrieval across task-of-origin boundaries and revision churn, where repeated accepted edits fail to recover the originating task. These findings characterize evolving skill libraries as auditable, shared procedural memory that can improve a fixed computer-use stack, while showing that their benefits are conditional and repeated revision does not guarantee recovery. Code is released at https://github.com/LongtaoHu/Skill-Evo4GUI.
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) create opportunities to enrich simulation-based energy policy analysis, particularly by supporting structured behavioural assumptions and exploratory techno-economic scenarios. However, directly replacing adoption models with LLM reasoning raises concerns regarding interpretability, reproducibility, and behavioural validity. This paper proposes a hybrid framework for LLM-assisted specification design, integrating bounded behavioural rubrics and structured scenario specifications into a calibrated agent-based model (ABM) of solar photovoltaic (PV) adoption by Irish dairy farms. The proposed approach preserves the original techno-economic adoption mechanism while augmenting it with bounded behavioural modulation and scenario-driven uncertainty analysis. Behavioural effects are represented through interpretable conservative, balanced, and optimistic rubrics, while future policy and market conditions are explored through fixed, rule-validated scenario specifications. Experimental results across multiple policy settings, Monte Carlo worlds, and random seeds demonstrate stable and economically plausible behaviour, with adoption outcomes remaining bounded and monotonic across behavioural regimes. The framework achieves up to approximately 13% behavioural adoption increase relative to the corresponding logistic case without producing unstable or unrealistic saturation dynamics. The results demonstrate that LLM-assisted specifications can be integrated into calibrated energy ABMs in a controlled, reproducible, and policy-relevant manner.
Iias Faiud, Hossein Khaleghy, Michael Schukat et al.· 0 citations
