We introduce the Web-CLI, a novel application architecture deploying powerful computational capabilities (command-line tools compiled to WebAssembly, models run through client-side inference runtimes, and GPU-accelerated engines) as zero-install, offline-capable browser applications that preserve full underlying capability. Unlike web-based alternatives that require server-side processing and expose user data to third parties, Web-CLI applications execute entirely on the client, providing a verifiable privacy guarantee by architecture rather than policy. We define the pattern and its four properties: fidelity, progressive disclosure, offline-first, and zero egress. We present four reference implementations across distinct domains: ffmpeg-webCLI, a browser-based video editor built on FFmpeg; whisper-webCLI, speech transcription via Transformers.js; chat-webCLI, WebLLM-based language model inference; and 3mf-webCLI, a deterministic tool segmenting 3D models into multi-material files for physical 3D printing. Together they demonstrate that the pattern generalizes across deterministic media processing, neural speech recognition, LLM inference, and geometry processing with a physical output, and we outline how it extends to AI-native interfaces in which a local language model becomes the command surface itself. We further report early, anecdotal signs of independent reuse by third-party tools, suggesting the pattern generalizes beyond its reference implementations. We evaluate the primary implementation against native FFmpeg on performance and feature parity, and argue that progressive disclosure lowers the barrier for non-technical users. We argue that for applications processing sensitive user data (medical, legal, journalistic, or personal), the Web-CLI should be the default architecture, as it makes data locality an independently verifiable technical property rather than a policy promise.
Task handover requires communicating enough current state for a successor to resume work, yet the relevant information is often divided between system records and human observations. System records can be precise and timestamped but only partially observe the task, while human reports capture intent and task knowledge that no log contains but are vulnerable to omission and memory error. We present a provenance-aware pipeline that converts task telemetry and human-authored reports into a shared typed task-state representation, aligns and reconciles their facts, detects conflicts, and generates structured handover reports. We evaluate the approach on 13 paired task states collected in a controlled spatial multitask environment, using task-grounded metrics that estimate the state-reconstruction cost a report would spare a hypothetical recipient and the misinformation burden it would impose. Reconciling both sources preserved greater estimated task-state utility than either the user report or telemetry alone. Relative to a direct end-to-end LLM given the same inputs, structured reconciliation maintained comparable estimated utility while incurring substantially less misinformation, and task-aware rendering retained utility more efficiently (per token) than exhaustive rendering. An exploratory content analysis further shows that human reports contain substantial strategic knowledge that lies outside state-focused metrics. These results support provenance-aware state reconciliation as a design pattern for safer AI-assisted handover.
Kayleigh Bishop, Maria P. Stull, Breanne Crockett et al.· 0 citations
We conducted an interview study with twelve students on their use of generative AI in academic communication. Students delegated professional messages to AI most where the pressure to sound professional is highest: email to instructors and administrators. AI involvement ranged from correcting the writer's own text to working out and writing the message outright, and students checked AI-written text against two criteria: whether it looks like AI and whether it sounds like them. Building on these findings, we model the AI-mediated process of writing a student--instructor email at the highest level of involvement we observed, and compare it with an unaided model of writing the same messages, built from participants' accounts and a classic model of the writing process. Three differences emerge: the learning loop that builds writing skill is removed, the message is no longer written for its specific recipient, and the confidence a successful exchange returns goes to using the system rather than to the writer's own ability. From these differences we derive two risks, that individual capacities never form and that authenticity and trust in communication become work. Design can respond to both but is unlikely to be enough, so the risks also need research and policy attention.
Open Large Language Model (LLM) research increasingly produces compact and derived artifacts, such as adapters, quantized checkpoints, merged models, and distilled variants, that are distributed across papers, model hubs, model cards, code repositories, and release statements. Although these artifacts are publicly visible, digital libraries often lack sufficient evidence to identify, preserve, and cite them as coherent scholarly objects. We introduce a framework that conceptualizes curatability as a record-level property of distributed scholarly records and operationalizes it through four evidence dimensions: artifact identity, scholarly linkage, upstream evidence, and release assets. Guided by this framework, we conduct the first collection-scale characterization of open LLM curatability using a May 2026 snapshot of 191,375 public Hugging Face repositories and a core corpus of 2,214 scholarly papers. Our results reveal a pronounced visibility-to-curatability funnel. While 90.7% of paper records contain at least one useful curation signal, only 18.1% combine usable upstream evidence with concrete release evidence, and only 6.1% provide sufficiently coordinated evidence to support high-curatability records. Based on these findings, we derive a minimal seven-field curatable record and complementary responsibilities for model hubs, scholarly indexes, and digital libraries, providing practical guidance for improving the preservation and bibliographic control of open LLM artifacts.
Yiyi Lu, Yilai Qian, Yucheng Jin· 0 citations
Reach audiences
Advertise in front of researchers, engineers, and readers.
Journaling is a common practice for emotional expression, reflection, and processing. However, as entries accumulate, it can become difficult to interpret and compare their affective content, especially since traditional text-based analyses and visualizations often struggle to convey affective nuance. We introduce Data Characters, a visualization approach that represents affective content in journaling through human-like characters. Using a customizable Data Character as a design probe, we investigate the potential of character-based representations for conveying affective experiences and explore what visual encodings emerge through customization. Preliminary walkthroughs with two participants demonstrate the intuitiveness and feasibility of the approach. This work contributes an exploratory approach to studying how affective experiences can be visually represented and encoded through anthropomorphic forms.
Diego Abarcar Calugay, Isabella Amador, Keke Wu· 0 citations
With the increasing importance of teamwork skills for modern workplaces, development of teamwork training programs has received substantial attention. Game-based teamwork training is one promising approach that is engaging, cost-effective, and well-suited to increasingly decentralized workplaces. However, design of effective game-based teamwork training requires understanding how a game elicits specific desired teamwork behaviors. Significant progress has been made in characterizing these relationships. However, despite its critical importance, little work has examined how a game's design influences team adaptability behaviors. This paper presents a preliminary framework for analyzing adaptability in cooperative games by conceptualizing adaptive stimuli as retrieval or disruption of players' ludic knowledge. We illustrate this framework through a qualitative case study that applies interaction analysis methods to gameplay videos of a Overcooked!, a cooperative cooking game. We examined instances where game events led to players altering their behavior and connected the game's design features that resulted in each event with three adaptive stimulus cue categories. Although exploratory and limited to a small case study of a single game, the proposed framework is grounded in established theories across teamwork research and game studies, and it offers an initial vocabulary for describing how cooperative games can be designed to create demands for team adaptation. With this continued development, the framework may provide an analytic tool to help inform the design and evaluation of purpose-built game-based teamwork training environments.
Human-like cognition does not select past experience by topical similarity alone: affective significance and unresolved conflict also shape what becomes accessible. We present PsychoAgent, a cognitive architecture for LLM agents that separates factual and affective memory and integrates both through a conflict-aware executive controller. Affective memories are first filtered by semantic relevance and then re-ranked by salience, preserving topical fit while allowing emotionally important traces to enter the prompt. Across three controlled conflict scenarios, the full architecture retrieved more conflict-critical memories than semantic-affective and single-memory RAG baselines (0.933 vs. 0.500 and 0.667), with a small semantic-similarity cost. Five blinded raters evaluated 27 outputs. After within-rater standardization, the full architecture had the highest overall mean (+0.22 SD), but corrected pairwise differences were not significant. A three-day illustrative trace further shows persistent affect, offline memory recombination, and selective memory reweighting. The findings support affect-sensitive retrieval as an inspectable mechanism for modeling human-like conflict effects in LLM agents.
Mohammad Amanlou, Parham Abed Azad, Farbod Davoodi et al.· 0 citations
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for emotional support tasks, such as negative thought reframing. This task relies on modifying cognitive appraisals, the subjective interpretation of events that elicit negative emotions, which is typically conceptualized along multiple discrete dimensions. Current LLM-based frameworks model cognitive appraisal by exhaustively evaluating all possible dimensions, but they fail to account for the varying saliency of these dimensions across different contexts. In this work, we investigate a vital yet overlooked question: "Can LLMs infer the salient appraisal dimensions from emotional support conversations?" To address this question, we introduce the AppraiSal benchmark, containing 996 emotional support conversations with human-annotated mental states, including salient cognitive appraisal dimensions. Furthermore, we propose PRISM, a multi-agent probabilistic framework grounded in Bayesian Inverse Planning, designed to improve LLMs' ability to identify context-specific appraisal dimensions. Experimental results show that PRISM brings improvements to LLMs across various sizes, particularly in identifying the most salient appraisal dimensions.
Hainiu Xu, Zhaoyue Sun, Hanqi Yan et al.· 0 citations
Large language models are increasingly proposed as educational tutors, yet stronger task-solving ability does not necessarily imply stronger learning support. Motivated by recent calls to measure the social impact of NLP systems in practice, we study whether public LLM tutoring benchmarks distinguish learning-supportive behavior from mere answer production. We propose a lightweight diagnostic based on the gap between solving-oriented and pedagogy-oriented benchmark performance. Using public MathTutorBench leaderboard results, we show that these dimensions are only partially aligned: across eight publicly reported models, the correlation between solving and pedagogy composites is 0.421, and several models shift meaningfully in rank when evaluation moves from solving to pedagogy. We then analyze the public TutorBench sample and show that agency-relevant behaviors are explicitly encoded in benchmark rubrics, especially in active-learning settings that reward guiding questions, calibrated hints, and non-disclosive scaffolding. Together, these findings suggest that educational-impact evaluation should not treat task success as a sufficient proxy for learning support. We argue that public tutoring benchmarks can better support positive-impact evaluation by reporting solving-oriented and pedagogy-oriented scores separately and by making disclosure-sensitive, student-agency-preserving criteria more explicit.
Alignment teaches vision-language models (VLMs) to avoid expressing demographic biases, and when gender is clearly visible they largely succeed. Far less is known about ambiguous inputs (a worker in full gear, a figure seen from behind), cases common in practice yet rarely studied. We find that minimal prompting pressure exposes occupation-gender defaults when prompting ambiguous input images, with models collapsing to male even for strongly female-stereotyped occupations. But do these outputs reflect what models actually encode internally? We introduce LALS (Latent Association Leaning Score), a zero-shot metric that projects visual-token activations into the model's text-embedding space to measure concept associations per token and layer. Across 15 occupations, over 800 gender-ambiguous images, and four VLMs, internal representations and outputs often become systematically decoupled: models often encode a female association internally yet output male. Layer-wise analysis reveals an asymmetric filter: male signal amplifies end-to-end while female signal peaks mid-network and is suppressed before generation. A color ablation shows that culturally loaded visual cues such as clothing color further modulate these internal associations.
Arnau Marin-Llobet, Simon Henniger, Mahzarin R. Banaji· 0 citations
The ubiquity of multimedia content is reshaping online information spaces, particularly in social media environments. At the same time, search is being rapidly transformed by generative AI, with large language models (LLMs) routinely deployed as intermediaries between users and multimedia content to retrieve and summarize information. Despite their growing influence, the impact of LLM inaccuracies and potential vulnerabilities on multimedia information-seeking tasks remains largely unexplored. We investigate how generative AI affects accuracy, efficiency, and confidence in information retrieval from videos. We conduct an experiment with around 900 participants on 8,000+ video-based information-seeking tasks, comparing behavior across three conditions: (1) access to videos only, (2) access to videos with LLM-based AI assistance, and (3) access to videos with a deceiving AI assistant designed to provide false answers. We find that AI assistance increases accuracy by 3-7% when participants viewed the relevant video segment, and by 27-35% when they did not. Efficiency increases by 10% for short videos and 25% for longer ones. However, participants tend to over-rely on AI outputs, resulting in accuracy drops of up to 32% when interacting with the deceiving AI. Alarmingly, self-reported confidence in answers remains stable across all three conditions. Our findings expose fundamental safety risks in AI-mediated video information retrieval.
Anders Giovanni M{\o}ller, Elisa Bassignana, Francesco Pierri et al.· 0 citations
Understanding the economic intent of Ethereum transactions is critical for user safety, yet current tools expose only raw on-chain data or surface-level intent, leading to widespread ``blind signing'' (approving transactions without understanding them). Through interviews with 16 Web3 users, we find that effective explanations should be structured, risk-aware, and grounded at the token-flow level. Motivated by these findings, we formulate TxSum, a new domain-grounded NLP task for DeFi transaction explanation, and construct a dataset of 187 complex Ethereum transactions with 2,375 token-flow annotations and transaction-level summaries.
We further introduce MATEX, a grounded multi-agent framework for high-stakes transaction explanation. It selectively retrieves external knowledge under uncertainty and audits explanations against raw traces to improve token-flow-level factual consistency. MATEX achieves the strongest overall explanation quality, especially on micro-level factuality and intent quality. It improves user comprehension on complex transactions from 52.9% to 76.5% over the strongest baseline and raises malicious-transaction rejection from 36.0% to 88.0%, while maintaining a low false-rejection rate on benign transactions.
Zifan Peng, Jingyi Zheng, Yule Liu et al.· 0 citations
A new method, called CW-Net, translates the reasoning process of an autonomous vehicle’s AI system into understandable concepts that explain its behavior.
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.
