This work introduces a novel approach, \textit{CanaryTrace}, to safeguard the ownership of text datasets and effectively detect unauthorized use by RA-LLMs, and demonstrates high query efficiency, detectability, and consistency, along with minimal perturbation to the original dataset, all without compromising the performance of the RAG system.
Yepeng Liu, Xuandong Zhao, D. Song et al.· arXiv.org· 15 citations· ⚡1
RATIO (Retrieval Across Typed Ideation Operations), a large-scale benchmark in which relevance is defined by three operations which are name ideation moves, provides a scalable training and evaluation framework for retrieval components that support literature-grounded ideation, opening up new research avenues on scientific inspiration retrieval.
AI-generated text detection is commonly framed as a binary document-level judgment about whether a text is human-written or machine-generated. This framing breaks down for mixed-origin writing, where content origin and expression origin may differ. We cast mixed-origin detection as dimension-to-composition source attribution, inferring content origin and expression origin before composing them into four collaboration types. We propose Dimension-to-Composition Routing (D2C-Routing), which routes content-side and expression-side evidence to supervised dimension heads before a learned gated composition layer predicts the final label. On MixD2C, a reconstructed split derived from the HART mixed-origin benchmark, our disclosed D2C-Routing-based detector system reaches 0.8603 four-way Avg TPR@1%FPR, 6.5 points above the same-split RACE-local rerun. Core ablations support the routing design, while error analysis shows that distinguishing AI-content/human-expression from fully AI-generated text remains the hardest boundary. Code is available at https://github.com/bystander563/d2c-routing-artifact.
Xin Chen, Fuwei Zhang, Yiqi Tong et al.· 0 citations
Long-context inference is bottlenecked by the memory footprint of the key-value (KV) cache, especially for small models under tight resource budgets. Existing KV cache eviction methods score tokens using the model's attention distribution or, in attention-free variants, each key's distance from a global reference point. Using a controlled leave-one-out probe, we find that attention magnitude is unrelated to a token's causal contribution to the answer (Spearman $\rho=-0.004$), challenging the premise behind dominant eviction methods. We introduce TwinKV, a training-free, attention-free redundancy signal that detects whether a token's key has a near-duplicate elsewhere in context. Rather than replacing existing policies, TwinKV acts as a composable repair pass: given a policy's fixed retained set, it identifies evicted tokens with no surviving duplicate (\emph{orphans}) and retained tokens whose information is duplicated elsewhere (\emph{redundant donors}), then swaps them while preserving the original budget and scoring rule. We compose TwinKV with four recent eviction policies across LongBench, LooGLE, RULER, and a short-context MMLU-Pro no-harm control at compression ratios ${0.3,0.5,0.7}$. On Qwen3-4B, TwinKV improves a majority of configurations for two policies, is near-even for a third, and helps only a minority for a fourth adaptive baseline already near a performance ceiling; gains across the three non-ceiling policies are smallest at the loosest ratio. On RULER with Llama-3.2-1B, however, that fourth policy improves in every evaluated cell because its Alone score leaves substantial room to improve. More broadly, Llama-3.2-1B shows a smaller average LongBench gain but a higher fraction of improved cells on LongBench and LooGLE than Qwen3-4B, plus a clean RULER win. We also identify few-shot classification exemplars as a task structure where TwinKV does not help on either model.
Hong Chen, Yuan Zeng, Yong-Wei Huang et al.· 0 citations
Reach audiences
Advertise in front of researchers, engineers, and readers.
This work proposes prediction-powered evaluation, a framework that combines limited human judgments with large-scale automatic scores to obtain data-efficient system comparisons that are provably unbiased, and introduces the Prediction-Powered Saving Ratio (PPSR), a meta-metric that measures how much human annotation an automatic metric can save when used within prediction-powered evaluation.
Mingqi Gao, Anthony B. Sicilia, Weiye Shi· 0 citations
A concept can carry different associations across languages, while modern language models learn English alongside many other languages during pretraining. Yet comparisons among existing models cannot easily isolate how any one language changes the way these models represent English concepts because their training corpora, compute, architectures, and random seeds all differ. We study this question through a controlled experiment with 40 matched 310M-parameter decoder-only models that share an architecture, tokenizer, training recipe, and English data source. Each bilingual condition adds one of eight languages, while four experimental comparisons separately account for English exposure, total training, and English-document overlap. We align each model pair using 3,000 common English words, then measure where 1,000 held-out English concepts fall along 50 fixed semantic contrasts, such as red versus white. Across 32 experimental comparisons, English concept positions differ more between bilingual and English-only conditions than between English-only runs with different random seeds. These differences are larger in contextual states than in token embeddings and peak in middle layers. The language learned alongside English can therefore change how a model represents English concepts even when its English input representations are explicitly aligned.
Large language models (LLMs) are trained predominantly on English-language internet text that over-represents certain cultural narratives, raising concerns that models flatten the diversity of non-Western storytelling traditions into a single homogenized archetype. We present a pilot computational study examining this across three maximally distinct Indian regional oral and literary traditions: the Rajasthani Pabuji epic, classical Tamil Sangam poetry, and Bengali folk tales. We collected authentic reference corpora for each tradition (11, 21, and 10 passages respectively) and prompted two LLMs (Claude Sonnet and Gemini) with 54 generation requests spanning three prompt types per tradition - generic, culturally specific, and regional-language. Using Sentence-BERT embeddings and cosine similarity, we measure reference drift (how closely outputs track their own tradition's authentic texts relative to the other two) and cross-tradition convergence (how similar outputs are across traditions). We find that while outputs remain closer to their own tradition's reference than to others, cross-tradition similarity is high (0.52-0.66) relative to what the traditions' genuine distance would predict, indicating partial homogenisation. Unexpectedly, prompting in the regional language (Hindi, Tamil, or Bengali) consistently reduced fidelity to the authentic tradition relative to English prompting, by as much as 27 percentage points for Rajasthani and Bengali traditions. We discuss this against conflicting prior results on multilingual prompting and argue it reflects a difference between eliciting general cultural diversity and simulating one narrow, lesser-documented oral tradition. We position this pilot as a lightweight, scalable complement to recent large-scale human-annotation studies of Indian cultural misrepresentation in LLM-generated stories, as part of a broader doctoral research program.
Chinese query correction (CQC) is important for search and query recommendation on content platforms, but supervised methods rely on large annotated correction pairs that are costly to maintain as query vocabularies evolve. Unsupervised correction with language models is attractive, yet in the short-query setting, unconstrained generation often over-corrects ambiguous inputs toward high-frequency phrases, causing intent drift. We propose \textsc{GUIDE}, a generative unsupervised framework for CQC based on a confuse-then-clarify paradigm. \textsc{GUIDE} encodes phonetically or visually confusable characters with shared-IDs and reconstructs the original query with an encoder--decoder architecture, which constrains correction to plausible confusion neighborhoods while learning from unlabeled query streams. A time-decayed, query-frequency-weighted objective further supports adaptation to rapidly changing query vocabularies. Experiments on \textit{QSpell 250K} and a large-scale real-world dataset (\textit{KwaiSearch}) show that \textsc{GUIDE} consistently outperforms strong baselines, while online A/B testing further confirms gains in correction quality and downstream engagement.
Lei Yang, Binbin Huang, Jiwei Tan et al.· 0 citations
Crosslingual evaluation of language models that enables fair comparisons remains a fundamental challenge in multilingual NLP. Existing studies adopt a variety of downstream tasks and intrinsic metrics with different theoretical justifications, yet there has been little empirical investigation into whether these approaches yield meaningful crosslingual conclusions. We systematically examine crosslingual evaluation approaches using controlled monolingual language models trained on parallel data with varying tokenizer vocabulary sizes and model sizes, and further validate our findings on multilingual LLMs. We further discuss challenges in achieving comparable downstream evaluation across languages. Our results show that several widely used normalized metrics introduce crosslinguistic biases rooted in tokenization, encoding, and orthographic differences. In contrast, sentence-level negative log-likelihood computed over semantically equivalent sequences provides more meaningful and consistent crosslingual comparisons.
Can language models be trusted in safety- critical operations? In such settings, strong per- formance on semantic metrics does not guaran- tee operational reliability: a misread altitude, a dropped execution condition, or a confused call- sign may score well under standard F1 yet carry sharply asymmetric operational consequences. We study this problem in air traffic control (ATC), where controller-pilot communication demands near-zero error tolerance, and use consequence-aware evaluation to test whether semantic scores misstate operational reliabil- ity. The framework is instantiated in a con- trolled diagnostic ATC benchmark grounded in aviation standards and feedback from 40 air traffic controllers across three countries. Evaluating 8 models, we uncover a system- atic semantic-safety gap: conventional scores give substantially higher performance estimates than consequence-aware evaluation, even for models that appear reliable under standard met- rics. Risk-aware fine-tuning narrows but does not close this gap, showing that consequence- aware evaluation is a necessary complement to standard NLP metrics before any real safety- critical deployment claim
Yujing Chang, Thinh Pham, Van-Phat Thai et al.· 0 citations
In psychological counseling, effective support is not always delivered through long, information-rich responses. Minimal responses, such as backchannel cues and concise empathic statements, help convey attentive listening, express empathy, and encourage clients to continue expressing themselves. However, existing counseling dialogue systems and evaluation frameworks often favor explicit, content-rich replies, overlooking the interactional value of brief counselor utterances. This paper presents a systematic cross-lingual analysis of minimal responses across multiple counseling dialogue datasets. We develop a two-stage filtering method based on utterance length and content, followed by contextual verification using a large language model (LLM). Our analysis shows that minimal responses are common in human-collected datasets but substantially underrepresented in LLM-generated ones. We further evaluate current LLMs in manually curated dialogue contexts where human counselors used minimal responses. The results show that strong commercial LLMs are capable of generating minimal responses when explicitly instructed, but still struggle to determine when such responses are appropriate. Counseling-specific models trained on synthetic data perform particularly poorly, tending instead to produce longer and more information-rich responses. Moreover, LLM-based response-quality evaluation may undervalue minimal responses, even when they are interactionally appropriate.
Large-scale vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable versatility across a wide range of multimodal tasks. However, understanding humor remains challenging because humorous content often depends on subtle interactions among entities, events, context, and implicit relationships across image and text modalities. These interactions can involve complex chains of reasoning that are difficult to capture through conventional prompting or linear chain-of-thought reasoning. In this work, we propose CaRGo-T (Causal Reasoning Graph-of-Thought), a reasoning framework that represents the causal and contextual relationships underlying multimodal humor as a lightweight graph-based reasoning structure. The graph is serialized into a code-based representation generated by a VLM, which can subsequently be interpreted by the same or a different VLM to produce the final prediction in zero-shot or in-context learning settings. We evaluate CaRGo-T on humor understanding and humor detection across four datasets spanning diverse forms of comedic content, including satire, sarcasm, and memes. Experiments with state-of-the-art commercial and open-source VLMs show that CaRGo-T consistently improves performance over existing reasoning-based baselines, achieving gains of approximately 1-20% on humor understanding and 1-3% on humor detection. Further analysis using mutual information indicates that the reasoning representations produced by CaRGo-T contain more information relevant to the target output than those generated by baseline reasoning approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/abhi1nandy2/CaRGo-T.
Abhilash Nandy, Rahul Seetharaman, Aman Bansal et al.· 0 citations
A new method, called CW-Net, translates the reasoning process of an autonomous vehicle’s AI system into understandable concepts that explain its behavior.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 31, 2026
With millions of users across the world, Julia has been used to conduct cutting-edge research and to design new drugs, jet engines, heat pumps, and more.
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.
New MIT research could lead to better materials for a fossil-fuel-free process for making the chemical that's essential to fertilizer and other products.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
