Peer review is central to scientific quality, yet reliance on simple heuristics, namely lazy thinking and non-specific critiques, has threatened review quality. Prior work frames lazy thinking detection as single-label classification and stops at detection, yet review segments often exhibit multiple co-occurring issues, and reviewers benefit more from actionable, guideline-aware feedback than from labels alone. We further show that off-the-shelf LLMs prompted for feedback frequently rewrite the entire review or address the authors rather than the reviewer, motivating an inference-time approach. We introduce an LLM-driven framework that decomposes reviews into argumentative segments, identifies issues violating ACL Rolling Review (ARR) guidelines, and generates targeted feedback using issue-specific templates refined by a novel iterative, reranking-based generation algorithm. In a controlled rewriting study, our feedback reduces guideline violations by up to 92.4\%. We also release LazyReviewPlus, the first multi-label dataset of 1,309 sentences annotated for detecting lazy thinking and lack of specificity.
Sukannya Purkayastha, Qile Wan, Anne Lauscher et al.· 0 citations
Nowadays, developing reliable DeepResearch-style long-form report generation remains challenging, as training and evaluation lack verifiable reward signals. Accordingly, rubric-based evaluation has become a common practice. However, existing approaches either rely on coarse, pre-defined rubrics that lack sufficient granularity or depend on manually constructed query-specific rubrics that are costly and difficult to scale. In this paper, we propose a pipeline to train preference-grounded query-specific rubric generators tailored for DeepResearch report generation. We first construct a dataset of DeepResearch-style queries annotated with human preferences over paired reports, and train rubric generators via reinforcement learning with a hybrid reward combining preference consistency, format validity, and LLM-based rubric evaluation. We evaluate the resulting rubric generators in two stages. First, on a held-out human-preference test set, the learned rubrics discriminate preferred from rejected reports more effectively than generic, prompted, or SFT-trained rubric alternatives. Second, when used as reward signals to train DeepResearch systems, our rubric generators yield substantial performance gains under both a simple single-agent ReAct framework and a complex multi-agent workflow on the DeepResearch Bench.
Changze Lv, Jie Zhou, Wentao Zhao et al.· 0 citations
LLM unlearning aims to remove the influence of undesirable knowledge from pretrained language models, which offers a practical mechanism for addressing safety and privacy concerns. Existing unlearning approaches, such as Gradient Ascent, are prone to catastrophic forgetting. Alignment-based approaches provide an alternative direction, yet their effectiveness is limited by the quality of the reference model. In realistic settings, both methods still require large retention datasets to preserve general knowledge. We propose a principled method that quantifies the target LLM's confidence in undesirable knowledge and uses it to calibrate the model's unlearning gradient updates more precisely. It enables fine-grained control over forgetting while better preserving model utility, thus reducing the dependence on retention data or prohibitive unlearning training data. Extensive evaluations on multiple benchmarks, including MUSE and WMDP, show that our method achieves effective unlearning and improves the trade-off between knowledge removal and utility preservation compared with state-of-the-art methods.
Zhengbang Yang, Yisheng Zhong, Junyuan Hong et al.· 0 citations
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used to automate chart generation from data tables, improving efficiency but introducing new misuse risks. We present ChartAttack, a framework for evaluating how MLLMs use design misleaders to generate charts that induce incorrect interpretations. We also introduce AttackViz, a chart question-answering (QA) dataset labeled with effective misleaders and their induced incorrect answers. ChartAttack reduces MLLM QA accuracy by 17.2 points in-domain and 11.9 points cross-domain. Conditional deception rates show targeted effects: correct answers shift to attacker-intended answers 11.2\% of the time in-domain and 11.7-14.9\% cross-domain, while originally incorrect answers rarely change. A controlled human study shows that ChartAttack-generated charts also reduce human QA performance. Finally, fine-tuning on AttackViz improves in-domain MLLM robustness to misleading charts. Our findings highlight the need for secure, robust MLLM chart generation. Code and data are publicly available on the project website.
Jesus-German Ortiz-Barajas, Jonathan Tonglet, Vivek Gupta et al.· 0 citations
Reach audiences
Advertise in front of researchers, engineers, and readers.
We present Expos\'ia, the first public dataset that connects writing and feedback in higher education, enabling research on educationally grounded computational approaches to teaching and evaluating academic writing. Expos\'ia includes student research project proposals and peer and instructor feedback consisting of comments and free-text reviews. The dataset was collected in the "Introduction to Scientific Work" course of the Computer Science. Expos\'ia reflects the multi-stage nature of the academic writing process that includes drafting, receiving feedback, and revising the writing based on the feedback received. Both the project proposals and peer feedback are accompanied by human assessment scores based on a fine-grained, pedagogically-grounded schema for writing and feedback assessment that we develop.
We use Expos\'ia to benchmark state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on two tasks: automated scoring of (1) the proposals and (2) the student reviews. We find that the two tasks are best served by different LLMs. Furthermore, closed-source models consistently outperform open-weight models, motivating further research on improving the performance of open-weight models preferred in classroom settings. Finally, we establish that a prompting strategy that scores multiple aspects of the writing together is the most effective, paving the way for more effective classroom deployment of modern LLMs.
Dennis Zyska, Alla Rozovskaya, Ilia Kuznetsov et al.· 0 citations
Despite strong performance on many tasks, large language models (LLMs) show limited ability in historical and cultural reasoning, particularly in non-English contexts such as Chinese history. Taxonomic structures offer an effective mechanism to organize historical knowledge and improve understanding. However, manual taxonomy construction is costly and difficult to scale. Therefore, we propose \textbf{CHisAgent}, a multi-agent LLM framework for historical taxonomy construction in ancient Chinese contexts. CHisAgent decomposes taxonomy construction into three role-specialized stages: a bottom-up \textit{Inducer} that derives an initial hierarchy from raw historical corpora, a top-down \textit{Expander} that introduces missing intermediate concepts using LLM world knowledge, and an evidence-guided \textit{Enricher} that integrates external structured historical resources to ensure faithfulness. Using the \textit{Twenty-Four Histories}, we construct a large-scale, domain-aware event taxonomy covering politics, military, diplomacy, and social life in ancient China. Extensive reference-free and reference-based evaluations demonstrate improved structural coherence and coverage, while further analysis shows that the resulting taxonomy supports cross-cultural alignment.
Xuemei Tang, Chengxi Yan, Jinghang Gu et al.· 0 citations
Aspect-based summarization has attracted significant attention for its ability to generate more fine-grained and user-aligned summaries. While most existing approaches assume a set of predefined aspects as input, real-world scenarios often present challenges where these given aspects may be incomplete, irrelevant, or entirely missing from the document. Users frequently expect systems to adaptively refine or filter the provided aspects based on the actual content. In this paper, we initiate this novel task setting, termed Content-Aware Refinement of Provided Aspects for Summarization (CARPAS), with the aim of dynamically adjusting the provided aspects based on the document context before summarizing. We construct three new datasets and conduct pilot experiments with four representative prompting strategies. Our analysis reveals that LLMs often over-generate aspects, resulting in excessively long and misaligned summaries. Building on this observation, we introduce a two-stage framework that derives lightweight scope guidance before aspect refinement and summarization, improving focus and reducing over-generation. Our extensive experiments show that the proposed approach significantly improves performance across all datasets. Moreover, our deeper analyses uncover LLMs' compliance when the requested number of aspects differs from their own estimations, establishing a crucial insight for the deployment of LLMs in similar real-world applications.
Yong-En Tian, Yu-Chien Tang, An-Zi Yen et al.· 0 citations
Current sign language translation (SLT) systems attempt to learn all aspects of signing---manual gestures, high-speed fingerspelling, and asynchronous non-manual facial cues---within a single end-to-end network. Learning multiple tasks without detailed supervision leads to poor recognition of fingerspelled proper nouns and technical terms, and leaves rich disambiguating information from lip movements largely unexploited. We introduce SignBind-LLM, a modular framework that addresses these limitations through three dedicated expert streams: one for continuous signing, one for fingerspelling, and one for lipreading. Each expert is pre-trained independently using CTC on approximately two million automatically generated pseudo-gloss sequences, removing the need for manual gloss annotation. A lightweight transformer with learned temporal alignment fuses the expert outputs, and a pre-trained language model translates the resulting pseudo-gloss sequences into fluent spoken English. At matched decoder scale (250M parameters), our architecture already surpasses all prior methods, confirming that the gains are architectural rather than a consequence of scaling the language model. Scaling to a larger decoder sets a new state-of-the-art across How2Sign: 23.1, BOBSL: 7.0, and ChicagoFSWild+: 73.6%, while requiring significantly lower training cost than prior approaches.
Marshall Thomas, Edward Fish, Richard Bowden· 0 citations
Millions of individuals' well-being are challenged by the harms of substance use. Harm reduction as a public health strategy provides non-judgemental, evidence-based information intended to improve health outcomes and reduce associated safety risks. Some large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated a high level of medical reasoning, promising to address the information needs of people who use drugs (PWUD). However, their performance in relevant tasks remains largely unexplored. We introduce HarmReduction, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' accuracy and safety risks in harm reduction information provision. The benchmark dataset (HR-Basic) has 2,160 question-answer-evidence pairs. The scope covers three tasks: checking safety boundaries, providing quantitative values, and inferring polysubstance use risks. We build the Instruction and RAG schemes to evaluate model behaviours based on their inherent knowledge and the integration of domain knowledge. Our results indicate that state-of-the-art LLMs still struggle to provide accurate harm reduction information, and sometimes, present severe safety risks to PWUD. This work contributes an evaluation framework for LLMs to deliver harm reduction information to avoid introducing negative health outcomes through the use of LLMs.
Kaixuan Wang, Chenxin Diao, Jason T. Jacques et al.· 0 citations
This paper provides an experimental evaluation of the capability of large language models (LLMs) to assist in legal decision-making within the framework of Austrian and European Union value-added tax (VAT) law. In tax consulting practice, clients often describe cases in natural language, making LLMs a prime candidate for supporting automated decision-making and reducing the workload of tax professionals. Given the requirement for legally grounded and well-justified analyses, the propensity of LLMs to hallucinate presents a considerable challenge. The experiments focus on two common methods for enhancing LLM performance: fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). In this study, these methods are applied on both textbook cases and real-world cases from a tax consulting firm to systematically determine the best configurations of LLM-based systems and assess the legal-reasoning capabilities of LLMs. The findings highlight the potential of using LLMs to support tax consultants by automating routine tasks and providing initial analyses, although current prototypes are not ready for full automation due to the sensitivity of the legal domain. The findings indicate that LLMs, when properly configured, can effectively support tax professionals in VAT tasks and provide legally grounded justifications for decisions. However, limitations remain regarding the handling of implicit client knowledge and context-specific documentation, underscoring the need for future integration of structured background information.
Marina Luketina, Andrea Benkel, Christoph G. Schuetz· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in socially grounded applications, where success requires interpreting context, inferring others' mental states, and reasoning about unreliable information. Yet existing benchmarks rarely evaluate these demands jointly in complex, evolving settings. We introduce SocialMaze, a benchmark that organizes six tasks across social deduction games, daily-life interactions, and digital community platforms along three descriptive design axes: deep reasoning, dynamic interaction, and information uncertainty. These axes characterize intended sources of task difficulty rather than latent, factor-analytic dimensions of model capability. Automated checks and human validation support data quality. Evaluations of twelve proprietary and open-weight LLMs show substantial variation in the use of evolving interaction histories; stronger chain-of-thought reasoners perform better on tasks requiring deeper inference, while uncertainty consistently degrades performance. Reasoning workflows help weaker short-chain-of-thought backbones but saturate on stronger reasoners. Finally, targeted fine-tuning on curated reasoning traces substantially improves structured social-reasoning tasks, whereas transfer to language-aggregation tasks remains statistically inconclusive. The project homepage is available at https://xzx34.github.io/socialmaze/.
Zixiang Xu, Yanbo Wang, Yue Huang et al.· 0 citations
Is political incivility rising across democracies - and if so, why? Analysing approximately 13.8 million tweets from parliamentarians in 26 countries with a validated large language model, we find that the share of severe incivility nearly doubled between 2017 and 2022, from $\approx$2.7\% to $\approx$5.8\% of tweets. Populism is the strongest party-level predictor (OR~=~1.46, 95\%~CI: 1.29--1.65), and its association with incivility is amplified in opposition. Stronger liberal democracy is associated with lower severe incivility (OR~=~0.84 per SD, 95\%~CI: 0.72--0.98). The rise in incivility is overwhelmingly behavioral - party families across the spectrum becoming more aggressive - rather than compositional: the growing prominence of radical parties explains little of it. Nationalist and radical-right parties remain the most uncivil throughout, but the gap narrows as their 2020 peak partially recedes while mainstream parties become steadily more uncivil. Together, these findings point to a mainstreaming of incivility: aggressive and demeaning rhetoric is becoming increasingly common across the political spectrum, with implications for public trust and democratic resilience.
A new method, called CW-Net, translates the reasoning process of an autonomous vehicle’s AI system into understandable concepts that explain its behavior.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 31, 2026
With millions of users across the world, Julia has been used to conduct cutting-edge research and to design new drugs, jet engines, heat pumps, and more.
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.
New MIT research could lead to better materials for a fossil-fuel-free process for making the chemical that's essential to fertilizer and other products.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
