This study proposes FrontierStep-RL, which replaces the direct N-dimensional action with two bounded variables: a frontier coordinate and a rebalancing step, which supports fixed-dimensional target selection and controlled execution for scalable, transaction-cost-aware portfolio RL.
Abstract
Portfolio reinforcement learning (RL) commonly represents each action as a complete asset-weight vector, causing the action dimension and exploration difficulty to grow with the investment universe. This study proposes FrontierStep-RL, which replaces the direct N-dimensional action with two bounded variables: a frontier coordinate and a rebalancing step. At each decision date, rolling estimates of expected returns and covariance define a regularized efficient frontier. A cost–risk-aware coordinate organizes the frontier using normalized local changes in predicted volatility and one-way turnover. The coordinate selects a frontier-supported target portfolio, while the step controls how far the pre-trade portfolio moves toward that target. We evaluate FrontierStep-RL on FF49, FF100, and FNSPID-50 against traditional strategies, controlled direct-weight RL policies, and recent portfolio-management methods. FrontierStep-RL achieves net Sharpe ratios of 0.75 on both FF49 and FNSPID-50 while maintaining comparatively low volatility, drawdown, and turnover. In the 100-asset setting, it achieves 0.68, compared with 0.52 for the strongest direct-weight baseline, and completes all runs. At a transaction cost of 50 basis points, it retains net Sharpe ratios of 0.559 and 0.568. The results support fixed-dimensional target selection and controlled execution for scalable, transaction-cost-aware portfolio RL.
Reinforcement learning for trading often struggles to balance upside participation with drawdown control. Profit-only policies can collapse toward passive long exposure on upward-drifting assets, while aggressively risk-penalized rewards can become too defensive during volatile periods. This paper proposes PPO-HRAP, a...
It is essential for market-making strategies to optimally capture the spread, balance their inventory, and adjust to changing order-book dynamics. In this paper, we explore the use of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) to perform adaptive market making in a simulated limit-order-book setting using the MSFT data from th...
Zubair Raja Ahamed Zaffarullah, Priyameet Kaur Keer, Rubani Singla et al.· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
Results from experiments show that RL-DynTrade outperforms both traditional approaches and RL models that use PPO or DQN alone in terms of stability, flexibility, and profitability.
Xi-Jing Ou, Jie Huang· International Journal of e-c...· 0 citations
This work offers a highly adaptable framework that successfully aligns multi-objective algorithmic trading with diverse, real-world human sustainability preferences and integrates a Preference Elicitation framework using Gaussian Processes.
Giovanni Dispoto, Marcello Restelli, Carmine Ventre· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) and multi-agent systems (MAS) have shown promise in financial decision-making, yet existing evaluations focus on equity trading and primarily assess directional prediction, overlooking the structural complexity of derivative markets. Option trading introduces fundamentally different challen...
Hao-Chen Luo, Yi-Fan Li, Binh Minh An et al.· 0 citations
This study examines whether integrating machine learning-based return forecasting and dynamic covariance estimation into a mean-variance portfolio framework produces measurable improvements over a conventional benchmark. Three strategies are constructed and evaluated over a five-year out-of-sample window from January 2...
Gun Assavasopee· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.