The future of search will be determined not by incremental improvements in ranking algorithms and natural-language interfaces, but by the design of open, transparent, and competitive agentic systems that govern how decisions are made and how markets operate, highlighting a set of grand challenges at the intersection of AI, economics, and system design.
Abstract
Digital search is undergoing a fundamental transformation from a human-driven process of discovery to an agent-mediated system of delegated decision-making. In the traditional model of digital search, users translate intent into keyword-based queries, evaluate ranked lists of links, and execute decisions outside the search interface. In an AI-native world, users express goals in natural language, agents interpret these intentions, and outcomes are returned as recommendations or executed decisions. This shift moves search from a link-based user interface to an embedded system component, with implications for transparency, competition, and monetization. The resulting system design problem raises key questions about information quality and access, trust, incentive alignment, and market structure. Early evidence from experimental agent-mediated marketplaces and economic theory suggests that small design choices, such as how stakeholders access information, how options are surfaced, and how actions are executed, have first-order effects on efficiency, competition, and the welfare of consumers and firms. We propose that the future of search will be determined not by incremental improvements in ranking algorithms and natural-language interfaces, but by the design of open, transparent, and competitive agentic systems that govern how decisions are made and how markets operate, highlighting a set of grand challenges at the intersection of AI, economics, and system design.
Research background: Artificial intelligence is shifting online shopping from recommendation-based assistance towards delegated search, comparison, configuration, and, in emerging cases, transaction execution. For SMEs, this transition may expand market access while simultaneously creating new forms of algorithmic gate...
Sarkawt Ali Ahmed Al-Dawoodii, Veronika Večeřová· Journal of Business Sectors· 0 citations
An AI-enabled lifecycle of Creation, Transformation, Transmission, Evaluation, Evaluation, and Governance is proposed and an AI-eWOM fit perspective is developed and a TCCM-organized research agenda identifies priorities for future research.
A. Joyal· Journal of business and mana...· 0 citations
People act on evaluative judgments produced by LLM agents, and in multi-agent systems those judgments pass through several agents before reaching a person. We show that a workflow's information architecture---source access, handoff format, and which model reads the untrusted content---governs how much of a coordinated...
Chun-Yu Hsu, Lun-Wei Ku, Chung-Chi Chen· 0 citations
This paper presents TechIntel-MAS, an eight-role multi-agent system implemented on the CrewAI framework, that transforms a body of disclosed patent filings, supplied alongside a free-text intelligence request, into a structured competitive-intelligence report.
Jan Černý· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
As agents take on long-horizon tasks, users shift from making individual decisions to overseeing autonomous execution. Yet the volume of agent activity and the fragmentation of supporting evidence make it difficult to determine which decisions warrant user verification. We study monitors that identify consequential dec...
Zhong-Xiang Sun, Jia-Hao Yan, Hong-Kang Zhao et al.· 0 citations
Conversational and generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems increasingly create and pass information between people. This can make it hard to see who created a claim, whether it was changed, and whom to trust. Many studies examine firsthand human-human and human-AI communication, but less is known about secondha...