Aug 2026· International Conference on Advanced Sensing and Intelligent Systems· Vol 14309, pp. 143091K - 143091K-17· 0 citations· 33 references
Engineering
TL;DR
This study contributes a phasebased process account of workplace AI adoption, a mechanism-based explanation of why strong intentions often remain sporadic, and phase-specific intervention guidance for deploying, governing, and workflow-embedding enterprise AI systems to enable sustained, routinized use.
Abstract
Although private use of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly increasing, employees in large organizations often remain stuck in experimental or sporadic AI use at work. This exploratory study investigates how employees progress from initial AI intentions to frequent and routinized AI use by drawing on the Rubicon Model of Action Phases. Based on semistructured interviews with twelve mid- to senior-level practitioners from large organizations and a Gioia-style analysis with substantial inter-coder reliability (κ = .72), this study reconstructs trajectories of employees’ use of enterprise AI applications (e.g., internal assistants or copilots) across four Rubicon phases: pre-decisional exploration, pre-actional commitment, actional implementation, and post-actional evaluation. The findings map four phase-typical patterns of experiences, behaviors, and decision mindsets and identify three Rubicon-threshold mechanisms that enable employees to translate initial intentions into routinized use of enterprise AI applications: (1) breakthrough value on real work tasks, (2) organizational legitimacy through secure, governed, and workflow-integrated enterprise AI systems, and (3) stabilization via routines supported by calibrated trust and, for some, an “AI-savvy” professional identity. This study contributes a phasebased process account of workplace AI adoption, a mechanism-based explanation of why strong intentions often remain sporadic, and phase-specific intervention guidance for deploying, governing, and workflow-embedding enterprise AI systems to enable sustained, routinized use.
Employees' AI crafting plays a critical role in enhancing the effectiveness of human–artificial intelligence (AI) collaboration. Yet, limited research has explored whether different forms of employee–AI cooperation – such as AI-led versus employee-led systems – distinctly shape employees' AI crafting, particularly...
Meng-Ye Chen, Ye-Man Cai, Bao Cheng et al.· Baltic Journal of Management· 0 citations
The pace of AI adoption in today’s business world has sparked a debate about the dual nature of AI and its effect on human productivity. AI tools are great for work, but they also make employees overreliant, with weaker skills and less critical thinking. This paper examines the advantages of AI tools at the workplace l...
Tamara Papić· SCIENCE International Journa...· 0 citations
Employee AI awareness (AIA) has emerged as a critical yet conceptually diffuse construct capturing how employees cognitively and affectively interpret the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) for their work. Addressing calls for psychologically grounded research on AI in organizational contexts, this study syst...
Harish Yadav, R. Dhar· Acta Psychologica· 0 citations
The article argues that adoption does not begin with an announcement, and grows when leaders make their own learning visible, useful, and safe for others to try, and translates the MODEL framework into five behaviors.
Sydney M Savion, Elizabeth Graswich· International Journal of AI...· 0 citations
This PRISMA-ScR scoping review mapped evidence on human-centered AI adoption in knowledge-intensive work and examined links with technostress, trust, autonomy, and employee well-being.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in organizational workflows, and employees can access and experiment with AI tools through ‘Bring Your Own AI’ practices. Wider access raises a theoretical question about whether organizational support (OS) continues to guide technology acceptance once AI access is...
Malinee Aonviset, Veera Bhatiasevi, D. Sagarik· Global Business Review· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.