Aug 2026· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2· pp. 13225-13231· 0 citations· 69 references
TL;DR
This work argues that the prevailing perspective on AI agent design is insufficient for achieving desirable social welfare, not merely due to computational or regulatory constraints, and outlines a bold vision: the development of a unified theoretical and empirical framework that supports the investigation of the use cases discussed above and potentially many more yet to be explored.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been growing at an unprecedented pace. Many of us have experienced a ''ChatGPT moment'' — a realization that AI will profoundly transform our lives. While numerous challenges and calls for improvement remain, there is little doubt that AI agents will play a central role in shaping our future. We argue, however, that the prevailing perspective on AI agent design is insufficient for achieving desirable social welfare, not merely due to computational or regulatory constraints. A key shortcoming lies in overlooking the fact that AI agents operate within an AI ecosystem composed of multiple interacting agents. When such agents act jointly, misaligned incentives or incompatible technological designs may lead to poor social outcomes. Importantly, this perspective is orthogonal to the ongoing efforts to compare artificial and human behavior. Our argument is not merely conceptual but constitutes a concrete call to action: to establish a systematic research agenda on Artificial Social Intelligence. We illustrate this vision through four complementary research directions: (i) understanding multi-agent alignment in search ecosystems, (ii) analyzing model selection in language-based economics as a strategic choice, (iii) rethinking fairness and regulation through the lens of multi-agent ethics, and (iv) designing hybrid social laws for human–AI coexistence. We conclude by outlining a bold vision: the development of a unified theoretical and empirical framework that supports the investigation of the use cases discussed above, and potentially many more yet to be explored.
The instrumental succession thesis is introduced: that human controllers of powerful AI systems pursue a set of instrumental dispositions that progressively increase the AI’s capabilities and lead to the AI exercising an increasing share of oversight and control over key decisions and processes, resulting in the gradua...
Preston W. Estep· Frontiers in Psychology· 0 citations
It is found that individuals are generally reluctant to cooperate with AI possessing partial decision‐making authority, and this reluctance is shaped by perceived AI perspective‐taking, and it is suggested that psychologically anthropomorphic design may foster more effective human–AI interaction.
Xu-Yao Wu, Ye Li, Rui-Ning Wang et al.· European Journal of Social P...· 0 citations
Rapidly developing artificial intelligence (AI) technology is widely regarded as humanity’s newest and most effective achievement. Beyond its capacity to permeate every aspect of life and generate solutions for diverse needs, it has also become a subject of intense debate due to the claims it generates regarding human...
Machine learning is gaining momentum in criminology, and the unprecedented transformative power of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to affect the discipline even more, perhaps in ways we currently struggle to imagine. In light of the growing role that AI plays in our field and in science overall, this...
G. Campedelli· annual review of criminology· 0 citations
Focusing on the case of AI‐generated apologies, this paper systematically examines the moral reasons the authors typically appeal to for resenting someone who uses AI to convey an apology and concludes that closer attention must be paid to these relational risks of generative AI.
The central claim of this paper is that current generative AI systems are not social agents despite their increasingly human-like language abilities and future work should seek to align their outward behavior with their actual capabilities while developing appropriate safeguards for applications in which emotional or s...
Matthias Scheutz· The Paris Journal on AI &...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.