Oct 2026· World Psychiatry· Vol 25· 0 citations· 57 references
Medicine
Abstract
We sought to clarify, using network analysis, the structure of genetic risk factors for a wide range of psychiatric and substance use disorders. Using split halves (N=1,510,974), we computed the family genetic risk scores (FGRSs) for 20 psychiatric and substance use disorders assessed in treated individuals from the entire Swedish population born between 1960 and 2000. We calculated a genetic correlation matrix for them to which we applied an EBICglasso network analysis. The network was dense, with five inter-connected clusters of genetic risks for internalizing, externalizing, neurodevelopmental, eating, and psychotic disorders. Genetic risks for four disorders were transitional across clusters: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) between neurodevelopmental and externalizing disorders; bipolar disorder (BD) between internalizing and psychotic disorders; obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) between internalizing and eating disorders; and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) between neurodevelopmental and psychotic disorders. The most central nodes in the network were genetic risks for major depression (MD) and drug use disorder. The strongest links of genetic risk for BD were with genetic risks for MD and schizoaffective disorder, with no direct link with schizophrenia. We then added genetic risks for borderline personality disorder (BPD), suicide attempt (SA) and suicide death (SD). Genetic risk for BPD had diverse links to genetic risks for SA, BD, internalizing, externalizing, and eating disorders. Genetic risks for SA and SD had their strongest edges with, respectively, genetic risks for drug use and alcohol use disorder. Our results were stable across split halves and when sampling only one sibling per family. Compared to standard factor analytic methods, network analyses can provide both confirmatory results and novel insights into the structure of genetic risks for a variety of psychiatric disorders.
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.
M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 401 citations· ⚡48
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The perception of the impact of agile methods is predominantly positive, and several challenge areas were discovered, but based on this study, agile methods are here to stay.
M. Laanti, O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson· Information and Software Tec...· 260 citations· ⚡20
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 2, 2026
Biology doesn't operate in silos, and neither should the AI representation of it. Quine is an early-stage research effort to create a multimodal world model of biology. By connecting insights across biological scales and modalities, Quine helps scientists computationally search a space far larger than intuition allows and prioritize hypotheses before they reach the lab. Experimental results provide important feedback, helping researchers sharpen future research directions. The post Introducing Q…