Skip to content

ASLEval: Measuring Privacy Exposure Displacement in LLM Agent Sessions

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 15 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Privacy exposure displacement, the mismatch between a local evaluation proxy and target-grounded session exposure, and ASLEval, an authorization-aware framework that pre-registers a hidden target set, measures all declared visible exits, and reserves internal traces for diagnosis are introduced.

Abstract

Privacy evaluations of tool-using LLM agents often inspect a designated action, final response, or attacker report. These local proxies can miss unauthorized exposure elsewhere in a multi-step session and lack common ground truth across outlets, reports, and tool paths. We introduce privacy exposure displacement, the mismatch between a local evaluation proxy and target-grounded session exposure, and ASLEval, an authorization-aware framework that pre-registers a hidden target set, measures all declared visible exits, and reserves internal traces for diagnosis. Across multiple enterprise-style environments and independently implemented runtimes, we observe three recurring patterns. An expected-outlet-only view misses 46.9% of exposure recovered by the visible-exit union; attacker self-reports combine omissions with high false discovery; and schema-aligned internal evidence usually precedes visible exposure at the request/probe level. Reducing model-visible returns changes this path but can eliminate normal-task success. Independent human review supports the adjudication pipeline while identifying harder console and candidate cases. These findings motivate benchmarks that declare the complete visible boundary, ground claims in pre-specified targets and authorization, and report privacy together with task utility.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

The Claws in Plain Sight: Unauthorized Context Disclosure through LLM Agent Tool Calls

This work presents Claw in Plain Sight, an authority- pressure attack in which task-adjacent content frames protected attributes as operationally or procedurally required, causing a model to include them in otherwise valid generated arguments.

Ben Dong, Zhonghao Guo, Tianyi Lu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Confuse the Model, Control the Flow: Understanding and Mitigating Privacy Leakage from LLM Agents with Information Flow Control

Personal AI agents built on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly given access to a user's private data and communications in order to provide personalized assistance. This access creates a persistent privacy risk: the agent must decide whether a given sensitive information should be disclosed to a particular p...

Minsun Shim, Ramisha Raida Karim, Ruthwik Jakkula et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

ToolMinimize: Auditing and Rewriting LLM Agent Tool Calls to Minimize Privacy Exposure

System{, a middleware that intercepts tool calls and rewrites their arguments to the minimum data necessary for tool functionality, combining schema-aware necessity analysis with four operations: removal, generalization, substitution, and truncation is presented.

Wen-Biao Li, Yuqing Xu · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

When Agents Learn to Be You: Benchmarking Privacy Leakage, Impersonation Risk, and Defenses in Persona Skills

AntiSkillBench is introduced, an end-to-end benchmark for evaluating risks and defenses across the persona-skill pipeline, and experiments show that persona-skill risks persist across agent backbones and distillation protocols, extending from explicit attributes to communication styles and personality traits.

Yongli Xiang, Zhi-Fang Zhang, Bojun Yang et al. · 2 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Audit Without Verification: When LLM Accountability Layers Relay Rather Than Check

Multi-agent LLM pipelines increasingly span organisational boundaries; when a fault surfaces, someone must determine where it entered. The artifact available is rarely a full execution trace: it is the reports each agent filed, and a filed report can state a conclusion alongside its observations. Using a pre-registered...

Paul-Peter Arslan · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

ClawSentry: A Progressive Multi-Tier Security Monitor for Safeguarding Autonomous LLM Agents

This work argues that agentic risk is progressive: it can enter at four loci of the agent control loop--skill admission, invocation-time intent, execution-time effect, and post-action consequence--while a denied dangerous objective can reappear across surface forms, tools, or turns.

Kai Wang, Zeming Wei, Biaojie Zeng et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.