The proposed AutoSaddler, an automatic harness optimization framework that formulates harness improvement as an offline learning problem and iteratively updates the harness using failure signals from mini-batches, suggests that automatic harness optimization is a promising path toward more performant and reliable agent systems.
Abstract
LLM agents remain unreliable on long-horizon tasks, where small local failures can compound over extended interactions and lead to overall task failure. Although external harnesses can substantially improve robustness, harness design remains a manual and expensive process that requires searching over a large space of prompts, tool configurations, and control logic. We propose AutoSaddler, an automatic harness optimization framework that formulates harness improvement as an offline learning problem and iteratively updates the harness using failure signals from mini-batches. AutoSaddler combines failure-trace diagnosis, structured patch generation that treats the harness as code, and validation-based update selection. Experiments on GAIA2, SWE-Bench Pro, and Terminal-Bench 2.0 show that AutoSaddler substantially improves agent performance over the corresponding base harnesses, achieving gains of 9.0, 9.6, and 10.0 percentage points, respectively. Ablation studies further suggest that effective harness optimization benefits from three ingredients: deep debugging rather than shallow reflection, targeted modifications rather than unconstrained editing, and generalization-aware selection rather than trajectory-specific repair. Together, these results suggest that automatic harness optimization is a promising path toward more performant and reliable agent systems.
This work introduces Harness-R1, the first method, to the authors' knowledge, that makes failure-conditioned, lifecycle-wide editing of an existing executable runtime a learned capability, and post-trains a dedicated harness engineer with online reinforcement learning so that its edits are optimized for the realized task success they produce.
Shuai Shao, Kangning Zhang, Qingyao Li et al.· 6 citations· ⚡2
Recursive Harness Self-Improvement is introduced, which represents the harness as a prompt-level specification of the agent loop and iteratively refines it using pairwise feedback over its own revision history, suggesting RHI as a practical algorithm for continual learning within the paradigm of model--harness co-evolution.
Hyunin Lee, Jinglue Xu, Jeffrey Seely et al.· 9 citations
MemoHarness is introduced, an adaptive harness optimization framework that learns from its own executions and improves over the fixed harnesses it is compared against and shows selective transfer to unseen suites and base models.
Yue Huang, Wenjie Wang, Han Bao et al.· 4 citations
HarnessLens is introduced, a budget-aware framework for automated harness evolution that jointly explores the task space and user-configurable components, derives candidate modifications from execution trajectories, and selectively verifies each candidate on behavior-relevant tasks using an attributable-evidence gate.
Jingheng Xu, Yi-Kai Zhang, Aiden Chen et al.· 0 citations
As LLMs are increasingly deployed within agentic systems, their capabilities depend not only on the model weights but also on the harness: the prompts, tools, control flow, memory, and orchestration code surrounding them. This makes automated harness optimization -- the iterative and evaluation-guided improvement of a harness by an AI system -- both an important route to improving AI systems and a demanding capability for AI systems themselves. Yet the community lacks a common protocol for measuring how well frontier LLMs perform at this task. We introduce HarnessOpt-Bench, a benchmark for end-to-end harness optimization under expensive and stochastic evaluation. An optimizer, an LLM paired with a coding harness, receives a target agent's seed harness, graded evaluation feedback, and a fixed target-evaluation budget. It edits the harness and nominates a final candidate, which is scored by its normalized gain over the seed on a held-out test partition that remains inaccessible throughout search. A trusted execution environment enforces the evaluation boundary, meters target-agent resource use, and preserves candidate versions for audit. We evaluate 5 frontier LLMs as optimizers both under a shared coding harness and under their native harnesses across 4 downstream tasks, over 111 scored runs. Experiment results show that optimizer models separate more than the coding harnesses they act through, native harnesses are not consistently superior, and gains vary substantially across tasks and seed regimes. These results establish harness optimization as a measurable and discriminative capability with large space for improvement.
Varun Ursekar, Apaar Shanker, Yash Maurya et al.· 0 citations
Frontier LLM agents are automating many business tasks, but their high inference cost makes large-scale deployment unsustainable. Small language models (SLMs) offer a cheaper alternative, yet they typically fall short when swapped into a harness designed for a frontier LLM. We show that for many routine business tasks, SLM agents can match LLM performance at 90% lower cost, when paired with an adapted harness that can be automatically discovered by a meta agent. The key insight is that much of the task difficulty is shared across instances and can be lifted from the model into the harness via tailored instructions, tools, and orchestration loops. To study this systematically, we create a framework that maps agent failure modes to harness adaptation strategies, and build a harness optimizer that automatically discovers effective adaptations from failure trajectories. Across seven business-oriented agentic tasks and three SLM families, we found optimized harnesses significantly improve performance on 16 of 21 task-SLM pairs, with seven pairs closing the SLM-LLM performance gap and the best SLM agent recovering 89.7% of LLM performance at 4% of the cost. Our analysis further shows that adaptation works best for tasks with more repetitive workflows and for SLMs with sufficient base capabilities. Together, these results suggest that harness adaptation can expand the practical deployment range of SLM agents in routine business tasks.