A task-driven evaluation framework that links depth-aware synthetic fog generation, image restoration, object detection, and tracking within a unified pipeline shows that restoration quality does not necessarily translate into proportional gains in downstream perception and therefore should be evaluated jointly with detection and tracking performance.
Abstract
Fog severely degrades the visibility of small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in long-range imagery, reducing the reliability of downstream detection and tracking. This paper presents a task-driven evaluation framework that links depth-aware synthetic fog generation, image restoration, object detection, and tracking within a unified pipeline. Given the practical difficulty of collecting and annotating foggy UAV scenes, synthetic fog is generated from real clear-weather outdoor images containing UAV targets using monocular depth estimation and the atmospheric scattering model. Representative restoration methods from classical, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based, and transformer-based families are first compared, after which the selected restoration model is integrated into the downstream perception pipeline. Detection is evaluated under both clean-only and fog-inclusive training regimes using multiple YOLO11 variants, while tracking-by-detection is assessed on clean, foggy, and restored video sequences. Beyond image-level restoration metrics, the study evaluates how fog and restoration affect detection robustness and tracking performance. Within the adopted synthetic-fog protocol, the results show that increasing fog severity substantially degrades both detection and tracking, primarily through increased missed detections. Fog-inclusive training provides the most consistent improvement in robustness, whereas test-time restoration is most beneficial when the detector has been trained only on clean imagery. These findings show that restoration quality does not necessarily translate into proportional gains in downstream perception and therefore should be evaluated jointly with detection and tracking performance.
Vision-based anti-UAV systems must function in poor visibility, yet most benchmarks use only clear-sky footage, and previous robustness studies treat adverse weather as a simple present/absent condition. As a result, the impact of fog severity on ground-to-air UAV detection remains poorly understood. This work presents...
Gur Levy Birkental, S. S. M. Ziabari, A. M. Alsahag· 0 citations
This review examines robust perception under low-visibility conditions as a pipeline-level problem requiring joint consideration of image enhancement, sensor fusion, detection, and evaluation, and indicates a shift from image-quality-oriented restoration toward perception-driven optimization.
A lightweight multi-scale enhanced detection framework tailored for complex UAV scenarios, built upon a MobileNet backbone, that introduces a multi-scale enhancement module that constructs a feature pyramid and incorporates a scale-adaptive fusion mechanism to dynamically reweight the contributions of features from dif...
Xuehua Tao, Ji-Wei Sun· Engineering Research Express· 0 citations
CAF-YOLO, a Complementary Alignment and Fusion Object Detection Model based on YOLO11 improves UAV-based visual measurement reliability through three designs, and is effective in another aerial-view vehicle-detection scenario, supporting UAV-based visual measurement applications.
Adverse weather attenuates fine-grained target cues, disrupts cross-scale feature propagation, and weakens long-range contextual dependencies in UAV imagery, making the detection of small and partially occluded objects particularly challenging. Existing state-of-the-art detectors for adverse weather are typically t...
A Lightweight Feature-Fusion and Small-Target Enhancement Network (LFE-YOLO), a lightweight detector that coordinates partial-channel feature extraction, efficient cross-scale fusion, high-resolution prediction, background-interference suppression, and stable tiny-box regression within a unified architecture is propose...
Mingxi Chen, Cheng Guo, Shao-Jie Ma et al.· Drones· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.