Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy; yet substantial proportion of patients exhibit intrinsic or acquired resistance, making accurate pre-treatment response prediction a critical unmet need. Transcriptomics-based biomarkers derived from bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) offer a promising avenue for capturing tumour-immune interactions, yet the cross-cohort generalisability of existing prediction models remains unclear.We systematically benchmark nine state-of-the-art transcriptomic ICI response predictors, five bulk RNA-seq-based models (COMPASS, IRNet, NetBio, IKCScore, and TNBC-ICI) and four scRNA-seq-based models (PRECISE, DeepGeneX, Tres and scCURE), using publicly available independent datasets unseen during model development. Overall, predictive performance was modest: bulk RNA-seq models performed at or near chance level across most cohorts, while scRNA-seq models showed only marginal improvements. Pathway-level analyses revealed sparse and inconsistent biomarker signals across models. Although scRNA-seq-based predictors converged on immune-related programs such as allograft rejection, bulk RNA-seq-based models exhibited little reproducible overlap. PRECISE and NetBio identified the most coherent immune-related themes, whereas IRNet predominantly captured metabolic pathways weakly aligned with ICI biology. Together, these findings demonstrate the limited cross-cohort robustness and biological consistency of current transcriptomic ICI prediction models, underscoring the need for improved domain adaptation, standardised preprocessing, and biologically grounded model design.
Robustness analysis revealed that predictive performance plateaued for some therapies with increasing training cohorts but continued to improve for others, suggesting inherent limits of supervised brute-force learning for certain treatments, but additional data and deeper mechanistic modeling may further enhance transc...
L. Pal, E. Gertz, N. Nair et al.· Cancer Research· 0 citations
Distinct signatures in the adjuvant and metastatic settings suggest differences in T-cell programs associated with patient outcomes, and support further evaluation of pre-treatment circulating T-cell transcriptional profiles as predictors of ICI response and toxicity in melanoma.
Noah Lepola, C. Dravillas, Shannon Gray et al.· Research Square· 0 citations
Signatures from cell-line drug screens are deployed to patient transcriptomes to predict response. In breast cancer this may re-encode routine clinical variables rather than drug-specific biology.
We tested whether ten transcriptomic signatures, scored without refitting, add pathological complete response...
Transcriptomic profiling may improve immunotherapy response prediction, but its incremental value beyond established clinical and tumor biomarkers is unclear. In 298 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma from IMvigor210, an atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) trial, we compared knowledge-guided tumor microenvironment...
Immune checkpoint inhibitor response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) reflects coordinated tumor and immune states that are not fully captured by single biomarkers. We developed scTIME, an interpretable model that translates single-cell immune programs into bulk transcriptomic scores, and integrated public singl...
Guo-Zhi Chen, Chen-Qiu You, H.-O. Gao et al.· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 0 citations
UniCure is presented, a multi-modal model that combines biological and chemical foundation models to predict drug-induced transcriptomic responses across diverse cell and tissue contexts, enabling individualized drug ranking.
Ze-Xi Chen, Saisai Tian, Jia-Zheng Pei et al.· Cancer Cell· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.