BBT outperforms traditional approaches at predicting human behavior while also revealing psychological insights, resulting in models that can both mimic Bayesian priors and capture heuristics and biases that violate simple modeling assumptions.
Abstract
Researchers must often choose between Bayesian or neural network models of behavior, two paradigms with complementary strengths and weaknesses. An ideal paradigm would facilitate testing many kinds of representations and inductive biases; Bayesian models make this easy, while neural networks do not. Similarly, an ideal paradigm would avoid over-simplifications; neural networks make this easy, while Bayesian models do not. Here, we introduce Bayesian distillation with Behavioral Tuning (BBT) as an approach to getting the best of both traditions. BBT offers a simple recipe for model building: first, a neural network is trained to mimic a Bayesian model through synthetic data, and second, the network is fine-tuned on human behavior to capture additional structure and nuance. Across four case studies in human concept learning, we find that BBT outperforms traditional approaches at predicting human behavior while also revealing psychological insights, resulting in models that can both mimic Bayesian priors and capture heuristics and biases that violate simple modeling assumptions.
Using predictive models to explain cognition requires more than accurate behavioral predictions. Input ablations offer an appealing route: remove information from a model and interpret the resulting performance change as evidence of its importance for behavior. Yet this inference assumes that the model's dependence on...
Bayesian decision theory proposes that people make statistically rational decisions by combining prior knowledge with sensory information (likelihoods). This framework successfully explains many aspects of human behaviour. However, debate persists over whether people perform precise Bayesian computations (i.e., explici...
Chin-Hsuan Sophie Lin, N. Terence, M. Garrido· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Bayesian inference provides a unifying formalism for describing the inferences humans and other animals perform about features of the environment that change on fast timescales (moment-by-moment or trial-by-trial), as well as their learning of environmental contingencies and regularities that vary over slower time scal...
T. Kovács, Máté Lengyel· Current Opinion in Neurobiol...· 1 citation
Computational hypotheses about brain information processing can be expressed in neural network models. Neuroscientists have begun to compare such models in terms of their alignment with neural and behavioral data. The high parametric capacity of these models is essential to their ability to capture cognitive processes...
Tal Golan, H. Schütt, N. Kriegeskorte· Nature Reviews Neuroscience· 0 citations
Research on Bayesian reasoning has been shaped by two productive traditions: ecological rationality, which explains why natural frequencies facilitate inference, and nested sets accounts, which show how transparent set relations support analytic reasoning. Together, these approaches have generated a rich empirical lite...
Hannah Fenwick, Guillermo Campitelli, Matthew B. Thompson· Psychonomic Bulletin & Revie...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.