Aug 2026· Teaching sociology· Vol 54, pp. 315 - 334· 0 citations· 46 references
TL;DR
A sociology-forward framework for integrating AI into the curriculum is offered, introducing “reflexive algorithmic capital” to describe the composite disposition students develop as they learn to interrogate AI’s symbolic authority, epistemic assumptions, and social consequences.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly reshaping social life, yet AI literacy remains underdeveloped in undergraduate sociology. This article offers a sociology-forward framework for integrating AI into the curriculum. Drawing on Bourdieu’s theory of practice, it emphasizes experiential learning, justice-oriented instruction, and critical sociotechnical reflexivity. Using survey data from an upper-division Social Research Methods course at a public research university, I show that students quickly gained technical proficiency with AI tools, but deeper engagement with algorithmic power required explicit pedagogical scaffolding. I introduce “reflexive algorithmic capital” to describe the composite disposition students develop as they learn to interrogate AI’s symbolic authority, epistemic assumptions, and social consequences. Findings show how intentional pedagogy can help students connect AI to broader questions of inequality, legitimacy, and knowledge production, offering concrete strategies for preparing them to navigate and critically evaluate the algorithmic systems that organize academic, economic, and civic life.
It is argued that AI is not a neutral pedagogical tool but a sociotechnical infrastructure embedded in corporate power, data regimes, and the broader political economy of AI, developing a Moral-AI Pedagogy Framework embedding normative transparency, structured pluralism, critical AI literacy, and assessment reform cent...
With a promise of efficiency-related benefits, Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are being rapidly integrated into educational practice, be it officially or not. Yet, a growing corpus of research highlights epistemic, pedagogical, and sociotechnical risks, such as bias, hallucination, surveillance, dependency, and t...
Lucas Guarise, Emanuel Felipe Duarte· Adjunct Proceedings of the 1...· 0 citations
Veteran educator Jo Renee Formicola argues that if higher education is to survive the challenge of artificial intelligence then administrators, staff, faculty, and students have little choice but to cautiously adapt by merging traditional pedagogy with innovative digital tools.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is progressively transforming educational practices worldwide by offering new possibilities for learning, for personalizing learning pathways and for managing knowledge. Its integration, however, also raises questions concerning digital inequalities, algorithmic bias, the representation of...
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has entered higher education faster than institutional policy can regulate it, a gap visible in Philippine humanities programs, where interpretive originality and authorial voice are central to disciplinary practice. Humanities programs in regional, resource-constrained Philippin...
Javier B. Sarmiento, Norvie Jalani· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
It is argued that under structural pressures to maximize productivity and efficiency, sociolinguistics positions itself as a cautious field, calling for critical reflection on the so-called AI hype.