Aug 2026· Heart· pp. heartjnl-2026-327872· 0 citations· 21 references
Medicine
TL;DR
In patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF, there was no significant association between pharmacological BP lowering and clinical outcomes, suggesting that BP lowering alone is unlikely to explain all the benefits observed with the use of recently established HF therapies.
Abstract
Background
The role of blood pressure (BP) lowering in patients with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF) remains uncertain, and it is unclear to what extent the existing benefits of therapies are mediated by BP reduction.
Methods
AND
Results
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials was conducted, comparing any BP lowering treatment to placebo, usual care or another drug class in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalisation. Data were pooled using a random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression with inverse variance weighting expressed as a risk ratio (RR) and its 95% CI. 18 studies were identified totalling 39 452 patients. Pharmacological BP lowering led to a significant reduction in the primary composite endpoint (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.89; p≤0.001), but there were significant differences between drug classes (p value=0.018), with evidence of benefit with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists but not other drug classes. Meta-regressions found no significant association between the degree of BP reduction and treatment effects (coefficient slope=-0.0125, p=0.304). Similarly, pharmacological BP lowering was associated with a reduction in HF hospitalisations (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.86; p≤0.001), but treatment effects were not related to degree of BP reduction (coefficient slope=-0.0121, p=0.528).
Conclusion
In patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF, there was no significant association between pharmacological BP lowering and clinical outcomes, suggesting that BP lowering alone is unlikely to explain all the benefits observed with the use of recently established HF therapies.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42025631539.
In patients with HFpEF and concomitant AF, beta-blocker therapy is associated with significant reductions in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and a permissive clinical approach to beta-blocker use is supported, particularly for rate control in those with elevated heart rates.
Shahrukh Mohammed, Khubaib Mohammad Murtafa, Rohit Vondivillu Srinivasan et al.· Irish Journal of Medical Sci...· 0 citations
In this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, beta-blocker use was not associated with a significant reduction in the primary composite outcome or in mortality or reinfarction, and should be interpreted with caution in the context of an overall neutral result.
Leonardo David Neira-Chunga, Diego Moncada-Gutiérrez, G. Vásquez-Tirado et al.· Medicina Intensiva· 0 citations
Beta-blocker (BB) therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is well established. However, recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in post-MI patients without significantly impaired LVEF have yielded conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed...
I. F. Arba, A. Primiputri, M. B. A. Paramarta et al.· European Heart Journal, Supp...· 0 citations
Background:
Heart rate (HR) reduction is commonly proposed to improve diastolic fi lling and reduce left ventricular (LV) fi lling pressure in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Ivabradine selectively lowers HR without direct myocardial effects, providing a mechanistic model to examine whether HR...
I. Wedharga, M. Hendri, M. Sanusi et al.· Bulgarian Cardiology· 0 citations
In HFpEF, beta-blocker discontinuation improved functional capacity and quality-of-life at 2 weeks compared with continuation with no clear effect on cognition, echocardiographic parameters or CV biomarkers, but findings on important long-term clinical outcomes was conflicting.
Wade Thompson, Nima Alaeiilkhchi, Lisa M. McCarthy et al.· Journal of Cardiac Failure· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.