Skip to content
#explainable ai Dataset Open access

PREVENTING WAR/BURNOUT: THE IRONIC PERSPECTIVES OF TRUTH, REALITY, AND WORKABILITY

Aug 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

PREVENTING WAR/BURNOUT: THE IRONIC PERSPECTIVES OF TRUTH, REALITY, AND WORKABILITY Gerhard Ris, author, is a pensioner, former DA magistrate, and lawyer · Preface This article has a one-page introduction as an excerpt on the topic: Preventing war/burnout: the ironic perspectives of truth, reality, and workability. It provides a tour of the horizons of the entire model, explained to an interested high school-level student. And, to any President of any court of law asked to take a timely interim measure in due order. My advice is to scan the index after having read the introduction. After that, scan the 17-page AI chat at the end of this paper. I’d give the chat an 8/10 score: understanding what I’m on about after AI was very rejecting at first, yet asked pertinent questions. In the end, AI deems what I state as consistent with all scientific online data, something AI is indeed good at, even though it understandably/admittedly makes mistakes in understanding what I am saying. Then scan the entire article, highlighting new insights since my last 19 DOI-publications on Zenodo: the CERN repository. The article proves that mainstream science can’t validly falsify the simple one-A4-block model since 2014 because it’s correct, with enormous consequences across the board as the introduction shows. The block model is a proven law of everything since 2024. A law that always applies, showing childishly easy 3D Euclidean geometry. Beware of going down the rabbit hole by getting stuck in details and losing oversight. Lots of terms are jargon that I’ve corrected on this elementary topic. I’ve redefined ‘religion'. Many people have lots of religious anchors reading certain terms that produce allergic reactions. This stems from not being able to do what AI does correctly: being both extremely open-minded and extremely precise in checking all online data for consistency extremely fast. The pertinent orderly question is: why can’t mainstream science pose valid falsification within twenty-four hours? The answer is simple: fear of losing peer-review power because my method, which is a slight improvement on Richard Feynman’s, is undeniably correct. My model and method meet the highest possible scientific standard, which ironically is the same as that for good engineers and good lawyers, who both are used to working with proven best practices given the lack of data in accordance with the laws that govern the topics at hand. Enjoy this scary testable fairy tale! PREVENTING WAR/BURNOUT: THE IRONIC PERSPECTIVES OF TRUTH, REALITY, AND WORKABILITY To save any decent democratic legal system, distinguish between: good narcissistic team members, mentally healthy criminal narcissists, and pathological narcissists. Narcissism is a linear function of every human; when irreversibly transformed, it produces a narcissist. This can only be kept in desirable balance by following the new law of human nature as an exact science written in a book that everyone can easily follow, ironically living in nature without the need to read it, unless you start using written language, arithmetic, algebra, and geometry. For then we will start to build “this time unsinkable” Titanics, subsequently, as repeating history, hitting the same iceberg. When you, in essence, do the same, the same happens. As all mentally healthy high school students learn to go by this book after twelve to eighteen years of Bildung, we won’t sink into the abyss. Bildung is neurologically internalised healthy hypnotic illusionism, defined as deep religion. As long as one follows ‘The Law’, one is guaranteed to have an optimal life. The 64 DNA personality types of the modelled factory of everything, such as producing justified content lives for all, can and thus must be learned by everyone. Deep religion, religion, slight religion, and the non/not yet religious unique self in a unique situation is the proven best practice method to assess any situation. Otherwise, mounting egoism will invariably slowly lead to a narcissistic authoritarian society ending in the thermodynamics of conflict and war as the law of the narcissist. Around 40% of humanity, including most professors of physics and mathematics, lack the talent to spot any new form of even the simplest ironic twist in arithmetic, algebra, and geometry. This can be easily tested by the 60% with the ironic talent in language by recording it on video. Only performing the proposed Oracle Senate Test and transforming the dysfunctional Trias Politica into a new Cinque Politica can save any decent parliamentary-democratic legal system. More billionaires, no poor, no war is easy because there is no money gene in our DNA. Freedom of Thought, Freedom of Relations, Security, and Respect are most critical in the respective distribution: 10%-10%-40%-40% of the collective human brains organised and trained consistently with ‘The Law’. Suicide is an ironic survival trait of the species. Judges by democratic law must indeed follow mainstream science. The President of any court is solely responsible for the order of proceedings and may even be honour-bound to ask preliminary questions, especially when science admits to being in transition because of serious structural errors of the highest order. Sick science can only be cured by staying in balance with the 10% artistic & 10% spiritual minority who have that DNA talent that majority rule religion ironically prevents. For the first time in our history on an infinite timeline, all the elementary science is in. An easily falsifiable claim within 24 hours by any behavioural scientist. They should be able to show any inconsistency very precisely. The reductio ad absurdum proof presented on one A4 shows that all brain waves are identical to all the waves in everything as the order function of everything. The more absurd the world, the more difficult irony becomes. Elementary scientists should, like good engineers, learn to treat evidence and proof like good lawyers and magistrates should, with incomplete data yet complete laws of everything. Mother Nature is a mass murderer with mass and not matter as the elementary murder weapon. The publication containing the first thousand elementary terms, descriptions, and definitions for use in elementary science, schools, and courts of law proves this extreme limitation of the Babylonian confusion is possible, even though never perfect; still, it is critically important. Elementary paradox should solely mean an inward contradiction, and any deeper insights a seeming contradiction best termed irony. A paradox is not an enigma or a seeming contradiction. Truth and truths are defined from one perspective; reality and realities are defined from more perspectives; workability (werkelijkheid in Dutch) is defined from all perspectives, which is at the beginning of absolute proof of everything existing proven beyond reasonable doubt infinite on circumstantial evidence of only data pro non con with only one remaining axiomatic assumption that everything is consistent, meaning no contradictions or incompleteness in ‘The Law’ also as the law of human nature. QED!

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Apr 2020

ECCOLA - a Method for Implementing Ethically Aligned AI Systems

Various recent Artificial Intelligence (AI) system failures, some of which have made the global headlines, have highlighted issues in these systems. These failures have resulted in calls for more ethical AI systems that better take into account their effects on various stakeholders. However, implementing AI ethics into practice is still an on-going challenge. High-level guidelines for doing so exist, devised by governments and private organizations alike, but lack practicality for developers. To address this issue, in this paper, we present a method for implementing AI ethics. The method, ECCOLA, has been iteratively developed using a cyclical action design research approach. The method aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.

Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson · 64 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Review Apr 2024

AI-powered Code Review with LLMs: Early Results

In this paper, we present a novel approach to improving software quality and efficiency through a Large Language Model (LLM)-based model designed to review code and identify potential issues. Our proposed LLM-based AI agent model is trained on large code repositories. This training includes code reviews, bug reports, and documentation of best practices. It aims to detect code smells, identify potential bugs, provide suggestions for improvement, and optimize the code. Unlike traditional static code analysis tools, our LLM-based AI agent has the ability to predict future potential risks in the code. This supports a dual goal of improving code quality and enhancing developer education by encouraging a deeper understanding of best practices and efficient coding techniques. Furthermore, we explore the model's effectiveness in suggesting improvements that significantly reduce post-release bugs and enhance code review processes, as evidenced by an analysis of developer sentiment toward LLM feedback. For future work, we aim to assess the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-generated documentation updates in comparison to manual methods. This will involve an empirical study focusing on manually conducted code reviews to identify code smells and bugs, alongside an evaluation of best practice documentation, augmented by insights from developer discussions and code reviews. Our goal is to not only refine the accuracy of our LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.

Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al. · 62 citations · ⚡3
#computer vision Open access Mar 2024

LLM-based agents for automating the enhancement of user story quality: An early report

In agile software development, maintaining high-quality user stories is crucial, but also challenging. This study explores the use of large language models to automatically improve the user story quality in Austrian Post Group IT agile teams. We developed a reference model for an Autonomous LLM-based Agent System and implemented it at the company. The quality of user stories in the study and the effectiveness of these agents for user story quality improvement was assessed by 11 participants across six agile teams. Our findings demonstrate the potential of LLMs in improving user story quality, contributing to the research on AI role in agile development, and providing a practical example of the transformative impact of AI in an industry setting.

Zheying Zhang, M. Rayhan, Tomas Herda et al. · 48 citations · ⚡4
#computer vision Review Mar 2024

System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents: Concept and an empirical evaluation

Systematic literature review (SLR) is foundational to evidence-based research, enabling scholars to identify, classify, and synthesize existing studies to address specific research questions. Conducting an SLR is, however, largely a manual process. In recent years, researchers have made significant progress in automating portions of the SLR pipeline to reduce the effort and time required for high-quality reviews; nevertheless, there remains a lack of AI-agent-based systems that automate the entire SLR workflow. To this end, we introduce a novel multi-AI-agent system designed to fully automate SLRs. Leveraging large language models (LLMs), our system streamlines the review process to enhance efficiency and accuracy. Through a user-friendly interface, researchers specify a topic; the system then generates a search string to retrieve relevant academic papers. Next, an inclusion/exclusion filtering step is applied to titles relevant to the research area. The system subsequently summarizes paper abstracts and retains only those directly related to the field of study. In the final phase, it conducts a thorough analysis of the selected papers with respect to predefined research questions. This paper presents the system, describes its operational framework, and demonstrates how it substantially reduces the time and effort traditionally required for SLRs while maintaining comprehensiveness and precision. The code for this project is available at: https://github.com/GPT-Laboratory/SLR-automation .

Malik Abdul Sami, Z. Rasheed, Kai-Kristian Kemell et al. · 43 citations · ⚡2
#computer vision Feb 2024

Can Large Language Models Serve as Data Analysts? A Multi-Agent Assisted Approach for Qualitative Data Analysis

Context: Manual qualitative data analysis is time-intensive and can compromise validity and replicability, affecting analysis design, implementation, and reporting. Large Language Models (LLMs) enable human-bot collaboration in Software Engineering (SE), but their potential for qualitative data analysis in SE remains largely unexplored. Objective: The objective of this study is to design and develop an LLM-based multi-agent system that synergizes human decision support with AI to automate various qualitative data analysis approaches. Methods: We used LLM-based multi-agents systems to assist the qualitative data analysis process, deploying 27 agents, each responsible for a specific task, such as text summarization, initial code generation, and extracting themes and patterns. Results: The main findings are: (1) the LLM-based multi-agent system accelerates the qualitative data analysis process, (2) the system effectively automates tasks such as text summarization, initial code generation, and theme extraction, and (3) the publicly accessible code facilitates validation and further evaluation. Conclusion: The proposed LLM-based multi-agent system automates qualitative data analysis process, creating opportunities for researchers and practitioners. Future improvements focus on enhancing multilingual performance and integrating continuous expert feedback. The source code of proposed system and system details can be found here: https://github.com/GPT-Laboratory/Qualitative-Analysis-with-an-LLM-Based-Agentts

Z. Rasheed, Muhammad Waseem, Aakash Ahmad et al. · 40 citations
#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

The Key Concepts of Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

The growing influence and decision-making capacities of Autonomous systems and Artificial Intelligence in our lives force us to consider the values embedded in these systems. But how ethics should be implemented into these systems? In this study, the solution is seen on philosophical conceptualization as a framework to form practical implementation model for ethics of AI. To take the first steps on conceptualization main concepts used on the field needs to be identified. A keyword based Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) on the keywords used in AI and ethics was conducted to help in identifying, defying and comparing main concepts used in current AI ethics discourse. Out of 1062 papers retrieved SMS discovered 37 re-occurring keywords in 83 academic papers. We suggest that the focus on finding keywords is the first step in guiding and providing direction for future research in the AI ethics field.

Ville Vakkuri, P. Abrahamsson · 39 citations · ⚡2

Related blog posts