This article provides a comprehensive legal analysis of the crime of assault on the state’s airspace by examining the material element as articulated in criminal law theory and national legislation. Building on classical definitions of actus reus, the study explores how external physical conduct—such as unauthorized entry, deviation from air routes, low-altitude violations, misuse of transit and innocent passage, aircraft hijacking, and drone or missile incursions—constitutes the observable basis for criminal liability in the aerial domain. The research emphasizes that airspace violations generate both material results, including physical damage and safety hazards, and legal results, such as infringements on sovereignty, disruption of national security, and intelligence exposure. The analysis also details the evidentiary challenges in establishing causation, particularly in cases involving unmanned aerial vehicles, cyber interference, and ballistic missiles, where radar tracking, satellite imagery, and aviation logs play critical roles. A comparative study of Iraqi, Egyptian, and Emirati legislation reveals distinct approaches to defining and criminalizing airspace violations. Iraq provides a clear conceptual definition of the material element but lacks technological updates addressing drones and missiles. Egypt relies on sector-based aviation regulation without a unified doctrinal structure, creating fragmentation and interpretive challenges. The United Arab Emirates offers the most advanced framework, integrating international conventions, detailed domestic provisions, and modern technological controls governing UAVs and cyber threats. The findings demonstrate that modern airspace regulation requires cohesive legislative reform, strong alignment with international standards, and explicit recognition of emerging forms of aerial misconduct. The study concludes by proposing legislative pathways for strengthening national airspace protection in an era of rapidly evolving aerial technologies.
The consequences of the attack by russian terrorist forces on Ukraine as a sovereign European state include not only the deaths of Defense Forces military personnel while performing their duties to repel armed aggression in the combat zone, but also the murder of civilians through air strikes, the scale and criminal na...
K. Horbachov, V. Kutsenko, Yana Horbachova et al.· збірник наукових праць з мат...· 0 citations
State sovereignty over airspace constitutes a complete and exclusive authority recognized under Article 1 of the Chicago Convention of 1944 and internalized into Indonesian national law through Law Number 1 of 2009 on Aviation. The increasing intensity of international air traffic and rapid advancements in aviation tec...
Dijay Brian Firmandha, Agnes Harvelian· Focus· 0 citations
The absence of the aggravating circumstance of “damage to nature” in Article 266 of the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code, as it is a public action offense subject to private complaint, gives rise to investigations conducted by the authorities responsible for criminal prosecution, namely the Ecuadorian State Attorney...
Emerson Paul Domínguez López, Marco Alexander Chininin Macanchi· Revista Iberoamericana de Ed...· 0 citations
Despite extensive international and national legislation addressing aircraft hijacking, the passenger's legal position remains unaddressed and unregulated. Aircraft hijacking is regulated only in criminal and administrative law, not in civil, commercial, or private air law. As a result, passengers, the real and primary...
The article provides a comprehensive scholarly-legal analysis of the problems of ensuring military law and order and military discipline under the legal regime of martial law in Ukraine, viewed through the lens of a phenomenon specific to the current phase of the Russian Federation’s armed aggression – a war of attriti...
M. Koba, O. Pelahesha· Analytical and Comparative J...· 0 citations
Objective: This study examines how civil liability should be allocated when autonomous vehicles and commercial drones cause harm through distributed technological control rather than direct human conduct.
Theoretical Framework: The analysis draws on accident-cost theory, enterprise liability, product liability, and t...
M. Kaleta, Krzysztof Wojciech Trepczyński, Bartłomiej Sporyś· Journal of Law and Sustainab...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.