Skip to content
Open access

TRUST-CARE: A RISK-ADAPTIVE AI GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK FOR TRUSTWORTHY LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL DEPLOYMENT IN REGULATED HEALTHCARE INFRASTRUCTURE

Sep 2026 · International journal of computer information systems and industrial management applications · Vol 18, pp. 722-748 · 0 citations

TL;DR

This study presents a TRUST-CARE, risk-adaptive AI governance framework that incorporates the governance process into the lifecycle of LLMs, and advances the standard safety controls in healthcare towards risk-sensitive, evidence-based, auditable AI governance under human supervision.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming the landscape of healthcare, bringing new opportunities for clinical information management, decision support, documentation, and knowledge-intensive services. However, when these models are applied to regulated health care environments, the risks are not just about the accuracy of the models; they need to be addressed. Hallucinated content, privacy exposure, unreliable evidence, inappropriate automation, adversarial inputs, and uncertain model behaviour may compromise the accountability and safety of AI-assisted healthcare processes. Existing governance models are often based on pre-established controls and thereby have limited ability to rapidly adapt protection based on the varying risk levels of individual requests and clinical situations. Therefore, this study presents a TRUST-CARE, risk-adaptive AI governance framework that incorporates the governance process into the lifecycle of LLMs. The proposed system is based on a combination of contextual risk assessment, analysis of evidence reliability, processing of privacy-aware evidence, retrieval-based generation, hallucination verification, confidence calibration, and risk-triggered human oversight. The proposed methodology compares the performance of TRUST-CARE with the baseline configuration, conventional LLM, healthcare LLM, retrieval-augmented generation, and safety-guarded versions of the two baselines on the basis of task performance, evidence grounding, hallucination rate, calibration, privacy exposure, robustness, security, and expert trustworthiness assessment. The proposed architecture helps determine whether an AI response can be generated automatically, when there is a need for further evidence checking, and when human intervention must be mandated. The governance framework model provides a structured mechanism to link model behaviour with evidence quality, clinical risk, uncertainty and accountability. TRUST-CARE thus advances the standard safety controls in healthcare towards risk-sensitive, evidence-based, auditable AI governance under human supervision.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

An AI-Driven Risk-Adaptive Zero-Trust Framework for Emergency Electronic Health Record Access

An AI-driven risk-adaptive Zero-Trust framework that incorporates real-time patient deterioration into access control decisions and suggests that integrating clinical deterioration predictions into Zero-Trust access control can improve emergency responsiveness while preserving security and accountability.

Arthur Nashon Malingo, C. Budoya, G. Tesha · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

From principles to practice: an actionable framework for AI governance in healthcare organisations

Abstract Objective Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are being rapidly adopted in healthcare, yet organisational governance often lacks the processes needed to oversee their safe and responsible use. Previous AI governance frameworks largely focus on high-level AI ethics principles, leaving healthcare organisat...

S. Freeman, Amy Wang, Sudeep Saraf et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Patient safety governance in artificial intelligence-enabled healthcare: a systematic review and the artificial intelligence patient safety governance model

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming part of everyday healthcare practice, helping hospitals and clinics diagnose diseases, recommend treatments, monitor patients and manage medical data. While these technologies offer significant opportunities to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare, they also...

K. Falayi, Prince Chukwuemeka Ekeocha, Oladayo Mary Akintola et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Healthcare AI risk management: an innovator-informed approach from frameworks to practical worksheets for proportionate regulatory evidence capture

A targeted evidence synthesis and framework mapping exercise drawing on review-level evidence, scientific databases and regulatory sources found that a codesigned worksheet approach can support proportionate evidence capture and iterative risk management while remaining adaptable across use cases and maturity levels.

Tahmina Zebin, Jin-Yang Wu, F. Colecchia et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

From algorithmic performance to ethical governance: a deployment-oriented framework for responsible healthcare AI

The proposed Lifecycle-Integrated Healthcare AI Governance Framework (LIHAG), a four-layer deployment-oriented governance model integrating technical robustness, ethical safeguards, regulatory compliance, regulatory compliance, and human oversight as interdependent dimensions of responsible AI deployment is proposed.

Shehu Mohammed, Neha Malhotra, Sourabh Kumar · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Regulating the Unseen: AI Accountability in UK Healthcare Sector

A multi-layered governance model is proposed in which the four accountability layers operate through continuous feedback loops, enabling a lifecycle-oriented approach to the responsible development and deployment of AI in the UK healthcare system.

M. Unver, I. Ogu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.