This review examines recent methodological developments in CCC inference from ST data, focusing on how statistical, optimal transport, and deep learning frameworks incorporate spatial information to model ligand–receptor interactions and downstream signaling.
Abstract
Abstract Cell–cell communication (CCC) is essential for maintaining tissue organization and driving biological progression, yet its inference from transcriptomic data has long been limited by the absence of spatial context. Advances in spatial transcriptomics (ST) now enable mechanistically grounded analyses of CCC by preserving the physical organization of cells and their microenvironments. In this review, we examine recent methodological developments in CCC inference from ST data, focusing on how statistical, optimal transport, and deep learning frameworks incorporate spatial information to model ligand–receptor (LR) interactions and downstream signaling. We also summarize key mechanism-driven components shared across spatial and non-spatial CCC approaches. In addition, we discuss how tissue heterogeneity and spatial architecture can introduce context-dependent biases, particularly for permutation-based inference, and outline mechanistic considerations such as LR biochemistry, signal transduction, and condition-specific communication. We further highlight databases that curate intercellular conduction and intracellular signaling processes. By integrating spatial constraints with biochemical and computational principles, this review offers an integrated assessment of the opportunities and limitations of current approaches. We conclude by identifying key methodological challenges and future directions for developing robust, scalable, and mechanistically interpretable CCC inference as ST technologies continue to advance.
The current landscape of CCC studies is introduced, emphasizing how ST data provide spatially resolved insights, and the integration of novel algorithms to enhance CCC inference are discussed.
Introduction Cell-cell communication plays a critical role in tissue organization, development, immune regulation, and disease progression. Spatial transcriptomics enables the inference of such communication within the native tissue context. However, existing methods often rely on ligand–receptor co-expression or spati...
Hong-Jie Ji, Yue Huang, Yu Lyu· Frontiers in Cell and Develo...· 0 citations
Cell-cell communication is essential for tissue homeostasis and disease-associated microenvironment remodeling. Spatial transcriptomics enables the study of communication events in situ, but single-cell-resolution inference from spot-based data remains challenging because of uncertain cell-to-spot mapping, limited use...
Abstract Spatial transcriptomics has advanced the study of biological systems by facilitating the mapping of gene expression within native tissue environments. Nevertheless, the intrinsic high dimensionality, pronounced data sparsity, and intricate nonlinear relationships between tissue morphology and the transcriptome...
Ting Fan, Yu-Fei Leng, Jia-Tong Zhang et al.· Briefings in Bioinformatics· 0 citations
This review provides a physiology-centered blueprint for applying single-cell RNA sequencing, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, and spatial transcriptomics to non-model species and critically evaluates dissociation and preservation bias, genome annotation, seasonal and ecological variation, biological replication, pseudor...
Adnan Amin, W. Zaman· Functional & Integrative Gen...· 0 citations
Spatial transcriptomics captures molecular states within cells and their organisation in tissue. However, integrating fine-grained gene information with spatial context at scale remains challenging for existing foundation models. Here we present NexuST, a hierarchical foundation model that repeatedly interleaves gene-l...
Hai-Ping Liu, Qian Zhao, Li-Jing Lin et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.