Collaboration improved detection substantially over independent operation across the federation, recovering most of the performance achievable by centralized training, with the largest improvements at the operating points relevant to bounded audit capacity.
Abstract
The detection of elevated corruption risk in public procurement, where risk is measured by objective procedural indicators rather than by confirmed corruption, is typically constrained by the fragmentation of the underlying records: each national authority holds its own, and legal obligations prevent them from being pooled. The current study examines whether authorities can improve detection by collaborating without exchanging data records. To this end, a federated framework is developed in which each authority trains locally and publishes only model parameters and anonymized class-conditional statistics to a coordination layer. It is evaluated on real procurement records from three European Union member states, using a predictor set audited to exclude attributes that determine the label. Collaboration improved detection substantially over independent operation across the federation, recovering most of the performance achievable by centralized training, with the largest improvements at the operating points relevant to bounded audit capacity. A model trained on two authorities and applied to a third performed near the local base rate, so participation is a condition of benefit rather than an optional route to it. Perturbing the exchanged quantities carries a measurable cost that grows with model size, so that beyond a modest noise level, an interpretable linear model outperforms a higher-capacity network.
A regulatory-driven FL framework that treats compliance and fairness as first-class optimization objectives rather than as afterthoughts is proposed, and the results surface a known tension: enforcing demographic parity increases the equalized-odds gap, quantifying the price of fairness under differential privacy in fe...
J. Nalavade· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
A federated learning framework that combines a Gaussian-mechanism differential privacy layer with a coordinate-wise trimmed-mean Byzantine-robust aggregation rule, evaluated on a simulated cross-institutional classification task resembling fraud and clinical-risk scoring.
Training machine learning models across many institutions without moving raw data is attractive in theory, but the standard Federated Learning setup hands enormous power to one central aggregation server that participants must trust blindly. what happens when that trust assumption is violated and build a system, that d...
Raman Dubey, A. Jain, Richa Sharma· International Conference on...· 0 citations
GuardianAgent, a policy-conditioned anonymization framework that couples structured risk assessment with verified adaptive rewriting, achieves the strongest privacy-utility trade-off among published baselines and is the only method to reach more than 0.90 privacy in all three domains, remaining robust under a backbone...
Rui-Yi Yang, Gayathri Lihinikaduarachchi, Rahat Masood et al.· 0 citations
SecureFedShield is proposed, a privacy-preserving federated learning framework designed for secure financial fraud detection in adversarial environments that integrates adaptive privacy protection, trust-aware client evaluation, adversarial update detection, and robust model aggregation into a unified architecture.
Kriti Mishra· International Journal of Cre...· 0 citations
It is argued that predictive analytics is best framed not as an automated verdict machine but as a triage and prioritisation instrument that directs scarce investigative and audit capacity toward the highest-risk cases.
Funmilayo Ashore-Onisemo, Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma· International Journal of Mul...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.