Estimating age-specific heterogeneity in SARS-CoV-2 transmission from prospective longitudinal studies: the importance of correcting for study design
TL;DR
This study demonstrates that ignoring recruitment protocols can bias key epidemiological parameter estimates and highlights the importance of accounting for study design, and proposes a novel estimation framework that explicitly incorporates the household recruitment process into the likelihood and substantially reduces these biases.
Abstract
Longitudinal household studies, combined with mathematical modeling, are widely used to characterize the drivers of respiratory pathogen transmission, including the effects of age and symptoms. In practice, household recruitment protocols vary across studies, potentially introducing biases into observed data. However, these biases are typically overlooked in statistical inference, and their impact on parameter estimates remains unknown. Here, we use synthetic household outbreak data simulated under different recruitment protocols to evaluate how recruiting through infected children affects estimates of age-specific infectiousness and susceptibility. We show that, under child-based recruitment, the standard likelihood, which accounts only for transmission dynamics, leads to underestimating child infectiousness and overestimating child susceptibility by more than 30%. We then propose a novel estimation framework that explicitly incorporates the household recruitment process into the likelihood and show that it substantially reduces these biases. Applying this new approach to a French household study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, we estimated that children under 6 had 49% lower infectiousness than teenagers and adults during the Alpha wave, whereas no difference was observed during the Omicron wave. This study demonstrates that ignoring recruitment protocols can bias key epidemiological parameter estimates and highlights the importance of accounting for study design.