A continuous-time Markov chain formulation for household transmission dynamics in which the model state space is expanded to include transmission graphs describing infection direction and order, with idealised pathogen genomic data used to identify the transmission histories compatible with observations is developed.
Abstract
Models incorporating household structure, with different rates of transmission within and between households, are widely used in infectious disease epidemiology. These models can be calibrated using final-size data in which transmission ordering is ignored because it does not affect the distribution of final outbreak sizes. In particular, many distinct transmission histories produce identical final epidemiological outcomes, making it difficult to distinguish internal (within-household) from external (between-household) transmission and limiting parameter identifiability. Here, we develop a continuous-time Markov chain formulation for household transmission dynamics in which the model state space is expanded to include transmission graphs describing infection direction and order, with idealised pathogen genomic data used to identify the transmission histories compatible with observations. We conduct simulation studies which show that incorporating genetic information substantially concentrates the regions of high likelihood compared with models based on epidemiological data alone. In particular, genomic data reduces the dependence between internal and external transmission parameters, removing the characteristic ridge associated with their weak identifiability. These results demonstrate that graph-resolved household models enable improved transmission inference while maintaining analytical and computational tractability.
This study develops a methodology to estimate heterogeneities in COVID-19 transmission from under-reported incidence data using Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques and indicates that the model with heterogeneity was better supported than a homogenous model.
C. James, J. Matthiopoulos, D. T. Haydon· Epidemics· 0 citations
Understanding when and how pathogens spread from person to person is fundamental to characterizing transmission, interpreting surveillance data, and designing effective control measures. Yet key epidemiological delays--including the latent period, incubation period, generation interval, and serial interval--are difficu...
N. Jamieson, S. Park, K. Ainslie et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
In infectious disease transmission, regression and variable selection for time-to-event outcomes are complicated by transmission-induced dependence that violates standard independence assumptions. Pairwise survival analysis addresses this dependence by modeling contact intervals in ordered pairs, defined as the time fr...
Jeong-Min Lee, Patrick M. Schnell, G. Rempała et al.· 0 citations
A retrospective analysis of COVID-19 transmission dynamics across U.S. states using a modified population-based Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Asymptomatic-Recovered-Deceased (SEIARD) compartmental model provides insights into state-level epidemic trajectories and supports data-driven decision-making for optimal alloca...
Classical epidemic models assume that infected individuals are homogeneous, reducing disease progression to a single aggregate variable. This hides the role of within‑host variability, in particular differences in viral load that directly influence both infectivity and recovery. We propose a geometric perspective in wh...
Jamal Adetola, Charbel Z. J. Mamlankou, K. W. Houédanou· Biomath· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.